Which is better than the small leather panel or the pagoda panel? Suggestion on visual panel for site selection

Which is better, the small leather panel or the pagoda panel? At present, many of our friends, including Lao Zuo, may choose the pagoda panel to build more websites. After all, from the domestic open source and free WEB server panels, the pagoda panel is relatively stable and has mature functions. For the small leather panel, this name seems strange, but we are probably familiar with php studio, even our local WEB debugging environment uses it. Yes, the Chinese name of phpstudy is Small Skin Panel.

Many of our friends are hesitant about the choice of panels. How to choose these two panels?

First, the purpose and function of both panels

1. Small leather panel

The small skin panel is a server WEB environment based on the original quite old php studio WEB environment re architecture. Support Linux and Windows systems. Support CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and deep in, Web side management, and one click creation of websites, FTP, databases, and SSL; Security management, task planning, file management, PHP multi version coexistence and switching; It comes with LNMP and LAMP.

2. Pagoda panel

The pagoda panel is also a WEB environment that supports Linux and Windows client images. It has a high popularity in the circle and was widely known before the small skin panel reconstruction was launched. In addition, free versions have been launched to meet the needs of most users, but if there are modules that need to be paid for, you can upgrade the professional version and enterprise version, and of course, you can purchase modules separately.

Second, the difference between the two panels

1. From users

From the perspective of user volume, the pagoda panel should have advantages. Even though the small skin panel is an old brand, the reconstructed product is not necessarily superior to the pagoda panel in terms of function, and the pagoda panel is updated more frequently in terms of efficiency.

2. Functionally

From the perspective of function and user experience, I have experienced it once before, and the user interface experience of the pagoda panel is relatively good and brief. The small leather panel is a little messy. Of course, there are some basic functions. You can install nginx, Apache, and support the exclusive use of PHP in different sites.

In conclusion, if we are currently preparing for production projects, it is recommended to give priority to the installation of pagoda panels. If we need to experience different products, we can also try small leather panels.