How about the OpenLiteSpeed engine panel? Which is better than the CyberPanel?

At present, the visual panel of Linux server has a large space to choose from. For example, we commonly have WDCP, pagoda panel, AMH and other panels developed in China, as well as CyberPanel panels developed by foreign teams. However, the functions are similar. They can be built on Linux servers to realize visual management of website WEB applications. Here we want to understand some functions of CyberPanel. After all, this product is based on OpenLiteSpeed engine, which is different from Nginx and Apache.

OpenLiteSpeed, a lightweight and high-performance web server, similar to Nginx and Apache, is also a web engine product that can be used to build websites. It is said that applications on the server side are also relatively high-performance, especially we should see that there are many paid LiteSpeed engines used in virtual hosts. Some copywriters say that the engine performance of OpenLiteSpeed is much better than that of Nginx and Apache, but how is it actually used? Let's have a brief talk here.

1. Product features

The OpenLiteSpeed product itself is a visual panel. For example, we can refer to LOPM engine system installed by Ubuntu 。 OpenLiteSpeed itself is a visual panel management, but it is slightly more complex. However, the pagoda panel we see is non visual, and then it is visually managed through the WEB interface. The two engines are different. OpenLiteSpeed is free, while LiteSpeed is commercially available, which is suitable for lightweight applications.

2. Supporting tools

At present, there are not many panel toolkits available for OpenLiteSpeed on the market. For example, there are official CyberPanel and personal ols1clk one button package. Others do not seem to see more. There are many software packages based on NGINX and APACHE. For example, common AMH and pagoda panels are based on conventional NGINX and APACHE. Even though OpenLiteSpeed is so good, there are not many supporting tools and users, so we dare not choose it.

3. How to select

Personally, LNMP and LAMP are mostly used in the market at present, but OpenLiteSpeed is rarely used. For our users, we must give priority to everyone. For OpenLiteSpeed products, we can test the environment or use it for amateur learning.

In conclusion, which is better for CyberPanel than pagoda panel? From the product point of view, each has its own advantages, but from the user's choice, we prefer to choose more, so that we won't step into the pit, and there are more documents to learn.