Without buying a ticket, Zhang climbed over the wall and entered the tiger free range area of the zoo. The tiger was killed at close range, and the animal keeper shot the tiger to death.  

It is said that people are more important than tigers at any time. Although people make mistakes, they can't just think that people deserve to die. Even if people cross the wall and don't buy tickets, zoos have an unshirkable responsibility.  

Then the argument given for this point of view is that there were no tigers in this place. The zoo introduced tigers, which led to a major risk of being bitten by tigers in this place. Therefore, once a person was bitten by a tiger for any reason, the zoo's responsibility is primary.  

When I first saw this view, I thought it was absurd, but my logical thinking was poor, and I didn't want to understand the absurdity of this view. Then I read the comments below the view, which was very interesting, but also dialectical.  

Some people say that if you have a daughter and are raped, you cannot be held accountable, because if you do not have a daughter, others will not have the opportunity to rape. In this analogy: you – zoo, daughter – tiger, rapist – Zhang. You can see from this analogy at a glance that the responsibility is the rapist, not that you have a daughter.  

Then the netizens sent out brain holes one after another. Some people said that if someone jumped off a building, the property developer is responsible. If the developer does not develop the property, the place is flat, and people will not jump to death; Others say that if you cross the fence and are killed by a car, both the car manufacturer and the road repair are responsible, because if there is no man-made car and road repair, people will not die; Some shareholders said that I lost money investing in the stock market, and the government should also be responsible, because if the country did not manage the stock market, I would not invest and lose money.  

It's easy to understand a problem by analogy, but the reality is that many times people are easily influenced by emotions. For example, in your country, there is a view that "the dead are the most important", "what's the use of these words when people are dead?" When I was in a taxi, I asked the taxi driver a question: If a person runs a red light and is hit, what should he do? The driver said that people should not die, people should be fully responsible, people should die, no matter what, the driver would also lose money, and the driver deliberately added: "out of humanitarianism".  

When I was squatting in the pit at night, I suddenly thought of the real problem behind the logic of "the dead are the greatest". We learned the logic in high school: sufficient conditions, necessary conditions, sufficient and necessary conditions, but this knowledge will not be effective once it meets the emotional problems in reality. The popular meaning of "the dead are the greatest" is that "once a person dies, what he does is right or the probability of being right is high". However, in the previous logic, death cannot be regarded as a sufficient condition for doing things right. Conversely, it has nothing to do with death, even if the two things have nothing to do with logic. Hitler died, What he did was not necessarily right. We appealed to our emotions about two unrelated things. In addition to the "supreme theory" of "people are the most important", everything was full of sophistry.  
Therefore, I think it is really important that people should be responsible for their own actions and respect the rules, otherwise they will only be guilty of death.

When Luo Yufeng started his career, I was very young. I saw her conditions on the news:

Graduated from Beijing or Tsinghua University with a master's degree, majored in economics or proficient in economics, must have an international perspective, be 176-183 tall, have a household registration in the east coast, have no birth history, and be between 25-28 years old.

As an honest man with normal hypothalamic hormone secretion, his reflex arc was relatively short at that time. The first judgment was: idiot, which idiot would marry this idiot. Then add a judgment to this first judgment: this must be hype. So I was very young at that time, and didn't understand the essence of journalism and communication: topic. If they are all like Lin Zhiling, they don't have a topic at all. They even ask: Is there no news at such low conditions?  

Of course, I am not very interested in these news myself. As an honest person, I spend my spare time watching such island love heroines as Lena Sakamoto, Hatano Jieyi, Yoshikawa Lainai, Rixu Hamasaki, and so on. I spare the time between my right hand and left hand to watch either the photos of Rinai Asakawa or watch the small videos broadcast in Europe and America on chaturbate, The most boring time is to go to 1024 technical discussion area or Daguerre's flag to see the old drivers of the forum.  

So many years passed.  

Several public accounts I followed in recent days all wrote about Luo Yufeng. I thought what was wrong with Sister Feng, so I went to the microblog to search for relevant news. It was originally a popular article, "Pray for Blessings, Pray for Encouragement", telling her experience over the years, how she never resigned herself to come to the United States step by step, apply for a green card, and seek praise and blessing Yunyun. The story is very moving. Everyone's story seems very warm when recalling life. I don't want to say that. After reading this article, I want to correct some ideas in my mind. Because I had malice towards this complete stranger from the beginning, I was shocked when I thought of these malice in my mind now. So it is necessary for me to sort it out in order to correct this inexplicable malice.

• Does Luo Yufeng have the right to list her marriage conditions?  
  Of course, she has the right. Everyone has the right to find his or her ideal partner. Whether he or she can find it is one thing, but this right is undeniable. I also want to find a beautiful girl with a big chest and a swollen buttocks. Who's the problem?
• Then why are you disgusted with Luo Yufeng's proposal of such marriage conditions?  
  To be honest, he looks ugly at first sight. It seems that human beings are born with the gene of "judging people by their appearance". Men's impatience with beautiful women and women's screams when meeting handsome men are like instinct. But appearance is a kind of "God's food", which can't be changed basically. Why don't you feel disgusted at such conditions offered by beautiful women, while disgusted at such conditions offered by ugly women? On the premise that your appearance cannot be changed, your two different attitudes towards beautiful and ugly appearance are more about your own psychological problems.

Appearance is a kind of "capital". People who hold a bad hand should make more efforts to achieve success in the secular sense than those who hold a good hand. You can often see the inspirational stories of Ma Yun who was rejected by KFC because of his ugly appearance. Everyone who relies on his own efforts in a free market and does not rely on "deception" deserves respect.

Wish you a green card.  
May you have a bright future.

The second half of this article is pure fantasy.
Although I am not an anime fan, there are two animes that I love most. I have watched them for countless times, one is Slam Dunk Master, and the other is Chess Soul. The setting and plot arrangement of "Chess Soul" are extremely wonderful. I always think that this animation is the ancestor of cross cutting animation themes, and it is cross cutting from the past to the present.
The story is about a Japanese chess master in the Heian era, Satsuke Fujiwara, who spent thousands of years on the body of young Shinto, leading him to pursue and experience the "hand of God" in Go. Of course, I know very little about Go because of my low IQ. So far, I only know some simple concepts such as "qi", "robbery" and "eye" in Go, let alone play. Even relatively simple chess, I rarely win the APP software in my mobile phone.
However, in the mood of constant anxiety, there are two lines in "Chess Soul" that pop out from time to time to comfort me

1. Father, do I have the talent to play Go? I don't know if you have the talent to play Go, but you already have two great abilities. One is the ability to work harder than anyone, and the other is the ability to like Go more than anyone
2. Only in this way can people grow up. Even if they are full of fear, they will dare to face it, catch up in fear, and challenge in fear. Only in this way can you truly approach the "hand of God", and I will not give up even if there is no hope.

Sometimes I think those who have a lifelong hobby are extremely happy.
What I want to say today, of course, is not this animation, but the AI Master has recently won a series of top Go professional chess players in China, Korea and Japan, and now it is almost 60 consecutive wins. As early as the battle between AlphaGo and Li Shishi in early March, I was excited for a long time. We all know that it is almost impossible to exhaust the ways of Go ^{three hundred and sixty-one} The result is so vast that it reaches to the Buddhist term "Ganges sand", so people in ancient and modern times always use the fixed form when studying Go, which means that the previous research results are so promising, and the younger generation's transcendence of the older generation is to study new fixed forms. Don't you say "Ghost Gate" is not allowed? Master Wu Qingyuan will start with "Three Three, Star, Tianyuan".
But who would have thought that the progress of science and technology would reach this stage: you can't count, that's relative to the human brain, but people can invent tools, have powerful computer processors, and have countless awesome algorithms. Those that can't count for the human brain can count.
I suddenly thought of the Pythagorean school's "all things are counted".
Let's change our perspective. Many concepts in human beings can't tell the specific meaning, just like the "set" in Go. Do you want to say that those Go masters have really exhausted all the playing steps of the set they put forward? Never. But in real life, such as the concepts of "love", "courage" and "loyalty", people's understanding of it is always just the tip of the iceberg. If you ask a person "what is love", he can certainly say a little, but not all, because there are too many parameters of "love" and our brain capacity is limited. But the computer can. It inputs a number of parameters into the algorithm, and can accurately calculate the probability of your pursuing Taylor Swift. You can act according to its instructions.
"Be alert to AI, be alert to AI, be alert to AI" said three times. As soon as you are born, AI will input many subtle parameters such as your gene coding, birth environment, climate influence, etc, Then we come to a conclusion that you can live to 178 years old (theoretically, at that time, humans had conquered all the gene codes that lead to aging, but if people did not die, the world would always be the same group of people, which would lose its ultimate significance, so "the supply of pruning aging genes and controlling aging genes was written into law after a huge world war" Of course, the top leaders still have privileges, so maybe the last world will always have the only "golden brother"). He has the talent of being a cook. After 12 years of work, he will return to his hometown because of the atmospheric haze, invest in air purifiers successfully, drink and die by the West Lake, holding a sword.
We are in the "singularity" of mankind, and will leap forward like an exponential function.
The recorded history is only 3000 years. It is inconceivable that human science and technology have developed to the present level in the first two decades of the 21st century.
The speed of human development is getting faster and faster. I still remember that I was using a Nokia 6120 classic in 2008. In the past few years, even my father's mobile phones have all been intelligent. There are still two in hand, but Nokia has fallen. "The world was first changed by a group of elites, then mass produced by businessmen, and finally the general public enjoyed the dividends". It took ten years to conquer chess, but only nine months to go. If this speed continues, I can still enjoy the dividends brought by AI in my lifetime.
Although a little pessimistic, the future has come.