Recently, the topic of "Glory of the King" can be said to be more and more eye-catching. Here, the KPL finals of "Glory of the King" officially ended. We can see that with the mobile game "Glory of the King", the domestic mobile e-sports industry is in full swing, and there is the launch of the more controversial anti addiction system. For a while, "Glory of the King" Whether it is the "poison of the people" has been debated endlessly.

Doom：

The anti addiction system is not surprising to the game industry. Can it really work? I think it's better to have different opinions. After all, because all kinds of information on the network have been leaked, there are a lot of wanted information in any search. If primary school students want to be certified, they can still take advantage of this loophole. Of course, whether the anti addiction system can alleviate the "poisoning" of primary school students in Glory of the King, I think it is OK. Judging from the limited number, this method is actually quite simple and crude.

At present, the number of mobile games is everywhere, and the barriers to play are very low, which also directly affects the life and learning of some teenagers. The problem of Glory of the King is also a problem facing the entire mobile game industry. How can we better limit the playing time of teenagers? Besides the old-fashioned anti addiction, can we use more big data to synthesize better solutions? In addition to the better solutions that manufacturers need to provide, parents are still very responsible for this, so this matter will ultimately depend on the degree of cooperation of parents. In this way, it is still difficult to eradicate this problem.

Xiao：

As a phenomenal national mobile game, Glory of the King is now popular in most of China. Its simplicity and ease of use make many players call it the king's pesticide, which makes people unable to stop. Some even forget to eat and sleep. Therefore, various problems come in a stream. At present, many primary and middle school students in China are addicted to it and cannot extricate themselves from it, so it naturally becomes the target of public criticism, which has triggered criticism from all walks of life. However, most children today grow up in the company of "electronic nannies" in their childhood. Should parents also reflect? Moreover, many primary and secondary school students' game enlightenment still comes from their parents, and the growing addiction is also caused by a vicious circle with their parents' acquiescence.

In fact, I personally think that the platform needs to take some responsibility in the whole event, but the most important part is the parties themselves. Compared with Glory of the King, it is also quite innocent, which is a great loss. In addition, there are many games that can be played and played. Therefore, the key problem is not the game, but the supervision of parents and the self-control of pupils. In addition, didn't the authorities of Glory of the King also introduce a series of measures to limit and supervise the playing time of students? For example, the previous "growth guard platform" and the recent "health system" are all "hard decisions" made for minors and ordinary players. However, at present, the "health system" still has a long way to go, and this process needs to be improved in many aspects. In addition, we should have a healthy and good mentality to play games. Moderate games can relax and relieve pressure, but excessive games are counterproductive. Please cherish them.

Neverland：

Those players who used to be enthusiastic about Warcraft, if they heard the recent criticism of Glory of the King, they should think of the term "electronic heroin" for the first time. Now this view has come back. After so many years, it seems that we haven't reflected on it, and we still use "one shot to kill" to deny a game. Even though Tencent has launched an anti addiction system, King Glory seems to have been unable to shake off the impression of a "monster".

Tencent is responsible for this, but it must not be allowed to bear the blame. Some netizens teased that "the education of both parents" was also impossible. Although this sounds a bit harsh, it also reflects the parents' lack of supervision and education on their children. If you think about it, many parents now throw a mobile phone directly to let their children play without restrictions. You should know that children's self-control is certainly not as good as adults'. Once they are attracted to games, they will inevitably indulge in them. Therefore, the role played by parents is missing in this link.

You should know that even if "Glory of the King" is completely rejected, there will be other alternative products. Apart from that, Tencent's own "National Supergod" and foreign "Vanity" are both excellent MOBA mobile games. Do you want to ban all games? It is the most practical way to do this. It really needs the joint efforts of many aspects of society to implement it.