Canon 7D Mark II

All kinds of good, continuous shooting, focusing, focusing, image quality, high sense, better than 7D too much, also better than 70, 80, mainly reflected in the control of color noise, 3200 random use, 6400 thumbnail is also completely acceptable. Body texture, various interfaces, recording monitoring, 3.0 transmission, wifi card support, built-in professional functions, including focusing, delay, full HD photography.

On the contrary, it is not the whole picture, but the lens matching. I have a D750 for the whole picture, but now I use it least. The attendance rate is not comparable to that of 7D2 at all, and there is also the problem of endurance, which is not as powerful as that of 7D.

I have bought both 7D and 70D. The former has high sense garbage, real garbage and low sense image quality, but the 70D body is unacceptable. After 7D2 appeared, I went to a friend's physical store to try it. I really like it, especially the high feeling. Maybe its high feeling can't be compared with that of 5D4, 6D, D810 and d750, but compared with 7D and 70D, it has been greatly improved, which is reflected in the processing of dark parts, the suppression of color noise, and the refinement of grain feeling. 3200 is very reassuring to use. Even if there is a little grain feeling, it can support the texture of photos, The D500 has been considered before, but the first price is still relatively false. The 7D2 only needs about 7500, but the D500 should be close to 11000. After all, the 7D2 was officially sold in 15 years, more than a year earlier, so the D500 to 9000 may be appropriate. Moreover, the performance of the two is almost the same. However, the D500 front panel uses high-strength plastic, which is very uncomfortable even if it is high-strength. The wifi version I bought is very convenient for transmission. After use, whether it is fixed focus or ultra long focus, the 7D2 is incoherent in capturing, following and focusing. The price of less than 8000 also reflects Canon's sincerity for flagship products and understanding of the market. Canon knows that APSC is too expensive and can only become inventory, such as 7D. After several price cuts, the price basically bottoms out, It is very cost-effective to start with. For the current professional level machines, either 7D2 or 1DX2. The summary is that the price performance of APSC is the first!

After a long hesitation between 80d and 7d2, 7d2 was finally chosen. It is mainly based on the comprehensive consideration of focusing, continuous shooting, grip feel and body protection. After several days of use, I felt that everything was pretty good! The summary is as follows: Yesterday afternoon I went out to take 50 or 60 photos. The control of the shutter was better than when I just took the machine. The number of times of pressing down suddenly was greatly reduced. I only took dozens of photos, but I don't know much about it. I only have a little trivial feeling, and I just want to compare the used fuselage. 1: Photometry and white balance are accurate and reliable. On that foggy day yesterday afternoon, it was cloudy and rainy, and the air was not thorough. The machine could restore the light and shadow environment at that time relatively faithfully, which was not bad! 2: Highlight color is preferred. It is practical after opening, and can retain most of the highlight levels. It also makes up for Canon's so-called lack of dynamic feeling. 3: The shutter sound is light, crisp, with little time lag, and the movement of the reflector falling back is also small, which is greater than 5d2. 4: Raw original picture is gray with little color and contrast, leaving more room for maneuver in the later stage. I use the standard style. When I open the dpp, it directly displays the non sharpening filter: intensity 3, fineness 7, critical value 1. In normal use, I don't need to worry about the original image not being sharp. This is better than the original image of 5d2. When 5d2 opens the original image, the critical value often reaches 6-7. 5: The electronic level is very practical, so you don't have to worry about the horizon. This function should be vigorously promoted. 6: As for the most important focus, because it is still shooting, I don't feel much about it. I chose to focus on the area and watched a dozen or so focal points run across the screen. I was overwhelmed by the 5d2 focal point to the injured fragile mind and was immediately satisfied! ha-ha! 7: The control of the fuselage is very good. I can hold it with my fingers for one meter and eight meters, leaving a little room; The eyepiece is bright and clear, which reminds me of a text in primary school, "Our classroom is spacious and bright". It's really good when combined with the feeling of shooting; There is also 100% shooting, no longer worried about the entry of redundant materials after imaging. 8: The USB 3.0 interface is convenient for importing photos. In addition, you can customize the folder name. 9: In addition, there are some creative functions, such as multiple exposure, timing shooting, etc.

The power consumption is a little high. The high sense can be improved. There is no touch screen.

Canon narrow picture with the highest cost performance ratio!

All metal+sealed body, basically all working environments are competent; When the input is a CF card, it can still be cached even if there is no power; 65 points+EOS iTR AF, locked tightly; The control is absolutely first-class. Even without a touch screen, various shortcut keys can quickly adjust parameters.

Image of the past (that's all); The battery life is 800~1000 (35 ℃ outdoor working environment), and one battery is really insufficient in one day.