Comments on Panasonic LX7

advantage:
1. The zoom recovery and manual focus recovery functions are very suitable for visiting and shooting in museums and other places;
2. The manual shutter takes a long time, and the front curtain or rear curtain synchronization can also be set for the flash to achieve slow synchronization. There is much room for creative shooting in the darkroom.
3. The aspect ratio selection switch can set the four proportional pictures to different sizes (i.e. different pixel values). In this way, you need to use the "Extended Optical Zoom", which can be switched by simply flipping the switch. For example, set the 4:3 picture to 3M pixels, and the 3:2 picture to 9.5M pixels.

Disadvantages:
1. When white setting 1 or 2 is selected to adjust the white balance, the selection box in the screen is too large, and it is difficult to use white of appropriate size in the box as a sample.
2. After changing the size of the AF area, the AF area display may still be large according to the dark location or zoom rate and other shooting conditions.
3. The brightness of the picture displayed on the LCD screen is brighter than the actual shooting result, resulting in the dark picture taken. I need to turn down the brightness of the display screen.
4. Select the motion mode in the scene mode, and fail to automatically turn on "Fast AF".
5. Use the telephoto terminal to shoot. Sometimes the white balance of the picture is lavender.
6. The camera software processing is lacking. The longer the shutter time is set, the longer the time required to save the photos is also increasing in the same proportion. It's a waste of time to shoot fireworks and miss many wonderful moments.

I bought the machine and used it for 3 months before writing the advantages and disadvantages for reference only. Before starting, within the scope of my own budget, I checked and compared them online for 1 month before buying them. I like it very much. It is suitable for people who often go out to shoot scenic films. I hardly take photos of people.

The ordinary SLR lens may not have the absolute excellent lens quality (aperture and edge resolution ability). Compared with the traditional DC sensor, it has professional camera performance.

The focal length is short. For those of me who are used to the telephoto machine, it really has a great impact. However, it is normal to sacrifice the focal length in order to achieve good image quality.

The lx7 is absolutely the best in the same machine today. The main reason why lx7 is bad on the Internet is that its sensor is not big enough or even smaller than the previous generation. In fact, the new sensor and new technology could not be worse than the previous generation. As far as there is no other camera with a one inch sensor, if you want a large sensor, you can buy another one. The price is listed here. (Of course, this is not the case for those who have SLR to buy as a spare.). After reading the online evaluation, the quality of the lx7 lens is not generally good. You should know that the lens sometimes has more influence on the imaging than the fuselage. So I still think that if the price falls below 3000 in the future, it will be a good machine to start with... In short, for those of us who have used a lot of DCs, buy SLRs but can't afford lenses, and have certain requirements for imaging quality, the most important thing is that the price is within their own acceptance range, and lx7 is really a good choice

1. F1.4 Large aperture, taking pictures at night is quite good~ The camera is very clear;
2. The effect of macro virtualization is better, and the wide-angle effect of the distant view is also acceptable (attach pictures);
3. Fast response, clear picture quality, vivid color (adjust aperture in different environments)
4. Aperture adjustment function and viewfinder
5. Small and light, long standby time. Took fake pictures and videos of more than 10 gigabytes on the 7th day of the New Year;
6. 1080P video recording is available.

1. Although the aperture is large, it is slightly worse than the SLR;
2. Macro photography is general, slightly worse than SLR;

This camera is perfect for users who don't want to buy an SLR or want to be portable. The quality of SLR can not be forced. It is a good professional camera.

The compact and flexible function balance is much better than my original Ricoh gx200. Ricoh gx200 can't compare with lx7 at all.

The area of the photosensitive plate has not been substantially improved.

I have used Sony w350, Kodak z612, Ricoh gx200 and lx7.

Large aperture, high price, excellent manufacturing, more convenient than SLR

It is heavier than the mobile phone, and it is inconvenient to add a lens cover by hand, but the advantage is that you can add a filter,

It is convenient to take photos with mobile phones for daily life and travel. But seriously, this performance is better than mobile phones.

Clear and sharp imaging, good details, excellent quality, durable leather

Play back the picture, take off the lens cover and extend the lens

Value for money, worth having

It's really good to shoot macro, and I like imaging very much. The other thing is that under the premise of large aperture, the background is quite blurred. It's really good to use it to practice. And now the price is quite cheap

Maybe it's because I'm a beginner. I like taking pictures at night, but the effect is not very good.

The overall feeling is just like that. The price is in the bag. You can't expect more. The imaging is bright, which is my favorite. The key is easy to carry, easy to carry, easy to carry; Say important things three times.

The appearance is more retro than the LX5. Leica-1.4 has a large aperture, which is very exciting. I especially like the design of manual aperture.

Don't worry about whether the sensor is 1/1.7 or 1/1.63. As a DC, the LX5 has already satisfied me. I believe the image quality of the LX7 will not be inferior to that of the previous generation.

Just aim at the 1.4 aperture, and act decisively when the price is reasonable.

First of all, let's not talk about the appearance. It's beautiful enough. It's the same model as a Leica model. The lens is absolutely the best in the card. It's Leica again, with 1.4 aperture. All kinds of filters are highly playable and fully satisfy your creative desire. The price is reasonable. The parallel goods on a treasure will kill all the DCs of the same level

The bottom is small, so the pixel cannot be too high. However, this is not a disadvantage. In DCs of the same level, except for black cards, one or two geeks are 1/1.7. Why do they use Xiao Qi to fire?

Who knows who uses it? Please refer to the price when comparing black cards

Only the video recording is increased from 720P of LX5 to 1080P. Others didn't feel that there was a significant and qualitative improvement!

The appearance is also much inferior to the LX5. There is no essential improvement in performance. The legendary 1-inch sensor was not used, which is very disappointing!! If the price is more than 500RMB cheaper than the existing LX5, someone may consider buying this machine.

disappointment!! Disappointing new products!! Why not buy the LX5 before!!

Large aperture, good appearance.

The sensor is not 1 inch, but smaller than before. How can the image quality of such a small CMOS be better than that of the LX5

After two years of upgrading, I am extremely disappointed with the LX7. If the price is not cheap, it will be a bad warehouse!

The aperture is really big, it's good, it's also small, and the shape is quite in line with my aesthetic

At present, the high-end DC can not be mixed with 1-inch sensors, or can the aperture be larger than the RX100? Can you compare the Nikon J1 with 2600 yuan? Can noise control be better than the 1-inch model with CMOS four times larger than itself?

I have to admit that it is a good thing, but the launch is doomed to have no market. Panasonic doesn't use its strength in the right place. If you change to 1-inch CMOS, even F2.8 is good, unless you buy it at the price of 2000 yuan.

The LX7 has a very large aperture, which is unique among other cameras, and the smallest aperture is 2.3. It is excellent, especially for the night scene. The 1080P 50fps full HD camera without noise is excellent for taking the night scene of Shanghai Beach. Like the professional camera, it also has 12 full pixel high-speed continuous shots per second, which is very good for Canon 28MM wide-angle maximum aperture is F1.8, which is completely rubbish. LX7 24MM ultra wide-angle Leica certified lens has unmatched sharpness in ultra wide-angle

No shortcomings

The LX7 has a very large aperture, which is unique among other cameras, and the smallest aperture is 2.3. It is excellent, especially for the night scene. The 1080P 50fps full HD camera without noise is excellent for taking the night scene of Shanghai Beach. Like the professional camera, it also has 12 full pixel high-speed continuous shots per second, which is very good for Canon 28MM wide-angle maximum aperture is F1.8, which is completely rubbish. LX7 24MM ultra wide-angle Leica certified lens has unmatched sharpness in ultra wide-angle

In fact, what is the difference between 1/1.63 and 1/1.7? Don't compare the high sensitivity between lx7 and rx100. The use of 1.4 large aperture can avoid the use of more than 800 light sensitivity, and large aperture can make up for the lack of sensor size.
At the same time of maintaining the level of lx5 shooting scenery, the portrait shooting has been greatly improved, and the focusing speed has been significantly improved, which is conducive to capturing.

Of course, if the sensor is larger, it would be perfect, but the price

The machine is a good machine, but under the pressure of the rx100, I'm afraid it is difficult to achieve the sales of lx5.

It can be said that it is a complete work of LX series. The electronic level is really easy to use. With it, we don't want to use machines that don't have this function (including SLR) any more. It can scan panoramic views and broaden the range of angles. Others don't know whether there is a handheld night view. It is the only one in the super aperture DC. In addition to the easy-to-use anti shake and available high sensitivity, there is no need for foot stands in the night view, Ultra fast focusing makes street sweeping easy. I thought that street sweeping telephoto or SLR was better. In fact, the smaller the thing, the better, and the faster the reaction, the better.

Everyone knows that the bottom is small, but if the price does not exceed 2500, it is not a disadvantage. If there is no flip screen, it is not too big a disadvantage. In my opinion, the big machine on the flip screen is more needed, and the small machine can just turn the machine over.

The thing is quite good, but the light of the RX100 obscures it. As far as DC is concerned, it has no shortcomings. It has powerful photographing function and powerful photographing function, which should be available, but it also has something other people do not have. If you take only one machine to travel, the LX7 is not much inferior to the RX100.

Constant aperture

The photosensitive size is too small, and the positioning is awkward. Now the 1-inch photosensitive size has become the consensus of high-end dc. The LX7 has also made a camera with such a small photosensitive size. I don't know whether it is to make room for its own SLR or what I think

In short, it has obviously deviated from the market demand and mainstream

Aperture macro wide-angle shooting of night scenery is a powerful tool. All functions are balanced and suitable for candidates at all levels. The price is perfect around 2200.

This price is not a disadvantage.

Family, students, travel must first choice artifact. Leica lens is excellent.