Recently, I was writing a long article, but after several days of editing, I found that the more I wrote, the less I could start. When I couldn't sleep late at night, I thought about it and found that the biggest problem was the reversal of goals.
Reversal of writing goals
To put forward an argument, the following text should be the description of the argument and the argument. However, every time when the argument is filled, the eloquence extended from the argument will suddenly get stuck. In the end, the purpose of writing these things is no longer to draw the argument from the argument naturally, but to rack our brains to piece together the argument to support the argument.
In other words, the arguments I put forward are unrealistic, not well thought out and not supported by sufficient content; Without realizing this, he forced himself to extend backward, which made his theory untenable, so the article could not continue to write.
For example, the normal process should be to see A, B, and then prove C; The mistake I often make is that I subjectively think it is C first, and then piece together A and B according to my subjective point of view.
So what
In fact, it's not a big deal, but when encountering this kind of jam, it's necessary to think about whether it's a self-care cycle.
Sometimes, they fall into the strange circle of raising the bar. In order to raise one bar, three bars are extended. As long as one bar is not handled well, all bars are GG.
In order to avoid this situation, the book says to "think more", but I feel that the author just writes casually, and he doesn't think much.
What are you going to say
I didn't say anything. It's an ordinary gossip. I'll write whatever I think of.
