Old Roast Duck IELTS - Focus on IELTS preparation

The Old Roast Duck IELTS 3000 Q&A Series: Must IELTS Writing Be Clear? From small to large, we have been used to looking at problems dialectically. Everything must be good [...]

The Old Roast Duck IELTS 3000 Q&A Series: Must IELTS Writing Be Clear?

From small to large, we have been used to looking at problems dialectically. Things must have both good and bad sides. It is difficult to say whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Can we do the same in IELTS writing? Or do we have to have a clear point of view?

A: You must have a clear point of view. Detailed Rules of IELTS Writing Scoring Standards Task Response has very specific requirements for opinions.

If you want to get more than 7 points on the question deduction, you must always present a clear position through the response. However, only 6 points will be given if the conclusion is not clear or repeated if only a pertinent point is raised. The description of 5 points is "expressed a point, but failed to maintain consistent clarity in the process of argument".

Take the topic of the big composition on November 6, 2021 as an example:

The use of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

If everyone simply explains the advantages and disadvantages of social media replacing face-to-face communication during the discussion, the Task response will only have 6 points. If everyone compares the advantages and disadvantages after talking about them, and clearly points out that the advantages or disadvantages are greater, then 7 points will be given.

The above is a detailed explanation of "Must the IELTS writing point be clear?" I hope it will be helpful to everyone.