Headlines

Academician Gao Fu commented on "Han Chunyu Event": whether there is real scientific discovery is the key

On the 13th, Gao Fu said in an exclusive interview with Science and Technology Daily that the event should be viewed from three levels: first, whether the scientific findings are true, second, where the problem is, and finally, whether the hot topic is fraud.
Sina Technology | 09:41, October 14, 2016

12 scholars' real name voice: failed to "repeat" Han Chunyu's experiment, calling for third-party investigation

On the evening of October 10, 12 scholars stood out and decided to make their real names public by "repeating" the results of Han Chunyu's experimental method: "negative", "not working", etc. The popular expression of this conclusion is that they failed to "repeat" Han Chunyu's experiment, and his experimental method is "doubtful".
Zhongqing Online | 09:25, October 11, 2016

13 research groups' real name statement: Han Chunyu's experiment cannot be repeated, hoping to respond to the query as soon as possible

"Now there are scientists who have repeatedly failed to tell us that they are willing to give their real names." "Let them give their real names. If they are willing to give their real names, we will give their real names to those who have successfully repeated the experiment." This is a report of Science and Technology Daily that attracted much attention yesterday (October 10, 2016).
Sina Technology | 09:51, October 11, 2016

Han Chunyu responds that scholars cannot repeat their experiments: the possibility of cell pollution is the greatest

Han Chunyu has previously said that someone successfully repeated his experiment. As for who succeeded repeatedly, he still said it was not convenient to disclose. "Please be a little more patient. I'm still saying what I said before, and there will be new news soon." Han Chunyu said.
Sina Technology | 10:11, October 12, 2016

Analysis comments

Academician Gao Fu commented on "Han Chunyu Event": whether there is real scientific discovery is the key

On the 13th, Gao Fu said in an exclusive interview with Science and Technology Daily that the event should be viewed from three levels: first, whether the scientific findings are true, second, where the problem is, and finally, whether the hot topic is fraud.
Sina Technology | 09:41, October 14, 2016

Comment: Han Chunyu should make a different voice

On May 2 this year, Han Chunyu, an associate professor of Hebei University of Science and Technology, published a paper on the new technology of NgAgo gene editing, which was sensationally reported by the domestic media. However, up to now, many laboratories at home and abroad have expressed their inability to repeat Han Chunyu's results, and more and more questions have been raised about the experiment. Recently, 13 scientists called for the investigation of Han Chunyu, and the incident has become the focus of public opinion again.
Nan Fang Daily | 07:02, October 12, 2016

Comment: The investigation of Han Chunyu's experiment cannot be delayed any longer

The "Han Chunyu Event", which had been stuck for a period of time, seemed to have a turning point. 13 domestic scholars recently expressed their real names. After many efforts, their research team still could not repeat Han Chunyu's NgAgo gene splicing experiment, and called on the relevant departments to start an investigation.
Beijing Times | 02:19, October 12, 2016

Han Chunyu's Experimental Event, Ferment, Water Battle, Better Talk with Thesis

However, so far, the relevant parties have not released the survey results. However, Han Chunyu himself said that he provided a list of five people to David Cyranoski, Asia Pacific correspondent of Nature Biotechnology, and said that these five people were scientists who could repeat their experimental results.
China Business Daily | 06:21, October 12, 2016

Latest news

  • whole
  • Analysis comments
  • Latest news
Important news in the topic

It all started on May 2, 2016 when Han Chunyu, an associate professor of Hebei University of Science and Technology, published a paper on NgAgo gene editing technology on the international top journal Nature Biotechnology, NgAgo is considered as a new generation of gene editing tool, comparable to CRISPR technology previously known as "gene magic scissors", and is praised as "Nobel Prize" academic achievement by some domestic media.
However, the story went down sharply. In five months, none of the hundreds of laboratories in the world announced that they could succeed again.
Han Chunyu did not give a positive response to the growing voice of doubt, but received successive honors: Vice Chairman of Hebei Association for Science and Technology, the most beautiful teacher in beautiful Hebei, the National Natural Science Foundation of 1 million yuan... Thanks to NgAgo technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology has received a financial allocation of 224 million yuan from Hebei Development and Reform Commission for the construction of the gene editing technology research center of Hebei University of Science and Technology.

Hot discussion on microblog

expression picture video
one hundred and forty word
release