Pentax KP

The retro style is bright, the control is very convenient, and the quality of the focus picture is satisfactory. Many features/advantages are slowly being developed. It has been 15 years since I joined the Bin family, but the camera is not very good. Now KP, the image quality and control of the Bin family have always been the most satisfactory. There is no harm without comparison. It is specially better than other CNSs, including the most popular middle assistant of FUJI GFX50S, who hold KP to compare the same scene one by one, to show the quality of the picture, to tell the truth, and to dump them several streets. Canon 5D4 has poor picture quality, and the face is often black. In dim conditions, it is numb. Focusing on the model's eyelashes is no better than KP's details, at least no difference. It has always used Canon's full set to say, "Your small camera is good, very clear". That is, there is no Shangbin's unique skill - super resolution pixel jitter technology. NS doesn't say anything about it. Nikon is warm and always feels yellow. Sony's picture quality is not as good as that of mobile phones. Don't tell me about the late stage. Who has the free time to play one by one? Is it art or photography!? Fuji 50S middle assistant, perhaps accustomed to the control and settings of P home, thinks that F home is easy to navigate, and the settings are very simple. They are always anxious to press the next menu. They don't even have the radar chart to adjust the image quality style. The style is fixed and cannot be customized. The image quality of the DA 50/1.8 on the plastic bottom is better than that of the Fuji sub focal point. Especially at dusk, the houses on the back of the mountain, KP's tolerance is really good, which is very close to what you actually see. Of course, the color is better. Fuji takes care of the sky and the sun. At the back of the mountain, the color of the picture darkens a lot. I feel that the camera here and there is worth 40000 yuan, except that it is expensive and high in pixels. Tell me a few more things. Family C doesn't have HDR. KP's function is on the right shoulder dial. It's really convenient. The wave wheel starts when it turns. It is often set to the adv gear. It feels like a blockbuster at any time. Every time an old camera friend sees it, he urgently asks Canon how to call out this function. Ha ha, Canon doesn't have it. It really doesn't have it. Now any mobile phone has a photo setting. Of course, the 50S of Family F also doesn't have it. Ha ha. WIFI function. When I wanted to connect large screen TV, I had to toss the set-top box and install Canon and FUJI's mobile app. As a result, Canon 5D4, TV needs to check the password. In the camera's wifi settings, the password lock cannot be found, which is awkward and cannot be used; The FUJI is connected. Small and large sizes can be selected, and the display is also very vague. The firewood is useless; KP is the most convenient setting and connection. It can take photos remotely. It can directly set iso, exposure and shutter. On the contrary, it is the cheapest. It is the most convenient and operable in this use scene. Pixel sharpness and super resolution pixel jitter technology are not covered. Even if it is handheld, the sharpness of four consecutive shots is higher than that of the normal mode. The contrast is most obvious on the playback small screen. I feel that it is at least as good as full resolution. Of course, the 50 million pixels of the 50s in the middle and the second pair are really, and the advantage comes out when you zoom in to the detail contrast. (See shortcomings and summary for the continuation)

Of course, it's battery life, but it's not a problem (Continued advantages) In terms of visual experience over the years, in terms of picture quality, P>F>C/N>S. Family F is similar to Family P, and its color is also colorful and transparent. But Family P has accumulated 100 years of color understanding, and it has aura, which is not something other families can learn by increasing the contrast. Panasonic's video is good in quality, but the picture quality is not good. It has never been used. It may be similar to Family F, but in terms of system, it still has a long way to go. The skin color of the portrait looks like that of P's family, which is moist, transparent, white and has a human flavor. It is often photographed to be more beautiful and durable than the actual skin color. It is not a bit fake and miserable like other families. It is always strange. The skin color of Family F is good, a little dry, not as smooth as that of Family P. It is easy to use. I am used to using Home P, the menu is the most direct and convenient, and the buttons are reasonable, at least better than Home C and Home F. I remember that the 50S playback key is on the upper end of the back screen, which originally highlights a large part between the thumbs of two hands. You must move one hand to press it. The machine is heavy, and it is always in a hurry. Canon is in the leftmost row, and it must be on the left hand. KP is near the thumb of the right hand, and it can be reached with a stretch, It can be operated by one hand. The first choice for scenery shooting is P home, with good color, blue, green and red. KP has super analytical blessing, at least not worse than other homes in terms of overall sharpness. I appreciate the P family's understanding of skin color when taking portraits. In addition, KP has two levels of skin color polishing, which is very useful. As for sports and videos, to be honest, there is no special need. 90% of the scenes are enough. KP has many functions and rich customization functions, including color style settings, customized adjustment of radar chart, which can be adjusted at home or home. It is highly playable and is very suitable for beginners to play. I like RAW first, playback and then adjustment. Basically, all functions can be adjusted internally (including skin color, color style, sharpness, shadow, correction, white balance, exposure, etc.) to create the best effect settings, unified batch internal processing (500 at a time), fast running, real-time display of adjustment results, so cool!!!

Meet 95% of daily needs, compact and exquisite, good picture quality, suitable for landscapes and portraits, comparable to the full picture. With many unique functions and rich custom settings, it is most suitable for photographers (Continued advantages) KP focuses quickly, especially in dark places. The old lens has been improved a lot. With 16 85 and 553 plm, it is really enough. At least 99% of my scene needs are met. There are many other functions, such as high sensitivity, anti shake, various surrounds, user-defined key functions, flip screen, focusing range selection, including AI focusing of moving objects. There are too many, all of which are installed in this delicate retro small body, with fast processing speed and high efficiency. It is not the full set, but it is too heavy. KP can meet 95% of the daily needs, and the picture quality can match the full picture, so it does not bother itself. It is a small lens, a small bag, and it is not cumbersome to go anywhere. "Small is beautiful" is not only exquisite, but also portable!! I don't think I need to update the machine in 5 years. KP has met most of my daily needs. The best is what suits you.

Small, can be compared with some non inverse body, not non inverse but better than non inverse. The appearance is retro and beautiful, and it is a work of art with Binder bread dry head and princess head. It is estimated that Binder came out in order to sell the old scenes (joking). Five axis anti shake, super analytic pixel shake technology (dynamic support), the picture quality on the shelf can match the level of a crowd of full frames. Focus catch up, better than all old Pentax models, including the k1. The high sense is really powerful, not an empty label. It is completely OK when ISO is opened to 6400. Skin color correction, no low-pass filter, good color, and accurate white balance. Now Pentax is not only a landscape artifact, but also a portrait photographer.

Some people say that the battery is small and not durable enough. For the sake of size, it is not necessary to say that it is OK to use it. It's too lazy to compare it with a simple one. Anyway, it is enough to go out for half a day. Focus accuracy and speed are OK. Focus tracking is still painful. expensive price? Different people have different opinions. In fact, the performance of the kp is completely midrange, and the price of other midrange computers is not much better. Of course, if you want to talk about the brand of Pentax, I have nothing to say. If you like it, you can buy it or not. Nobody forces you. Kp is a good camera. I won't regret it if I use it well. My shortcomings are nothing to me for the time being. It is a problem for Pentax to play with lights. Of course, when it comes to playing with lights, it is not considered to use Pentax kp. After all, it is set at the amateur level.

According to the official report, the Pentax kp is between the flagship and the entry-level, but its performance is completely new, including the very important focusing performance and high sense, which are much better than the flagship k32, and its appearance pursues retro brightness. It is suitable for low-key literary and artistic personages. You can't go out and sweep the street with Binder cookies. It's enough to like the color and shape of Pentax photos, and it's worth starting.

A machine with amazing picture quality and control Manual control: There are enough wave wheels, which can quickly explode, and the aperture and shutter adjustment are very convenient!! Surprise! Light metering switch is very fast, very comfortable control enjoyment! Screen effect! Imaging effect: the picture quality is amazing, and the effect is intoxicating. It used to be a natural mode, but when we started the landscape mode, the color was a little refreshing! From K50 to new KP, I have no regrets. When someone asked about the brand new K1, they could buy a second-hand K1. I said that the C lens group is rich and can be played for a long time. The price is relatively friendly and the effect is not bad. From DAL553, PLM55, Sima 1835 1.8, to 50-135 150-450, it's a bit interesting. The colors of the Bin family are really great! If you like the purity of color and pure shooting, it is recommended to enter one!! Taking pictures of scenery can improve the quality of pictures! The workmanship and cost performance of the product are good, and it is worth getting started! If a novice enters KP directly, he or she will have a strong shooting motivation with the Star Mirror. The unexpected surprises are enough to stimulate a strong creative impulse!!

The infrared remote control shooting function is canceled. When going out for night shooting, you need to take a shutter line or set a delay shooting. As for the battery life, there is no problem. It is basically enough