Pentax K-3

1. It is very practical to increase the resolution from 1600W to 2400W pixels. For example, the biggest difference between bird shooting and macro is the pupillary expressiveness of people and animals. It can be said that there is no need to sharpen the pupil of K3~ 2. The focusing system really has a great improvement~I won't say anything when I test it with a small aperture socket~* 55's focusing performance on K52 can be said to be very disappointing~(it's like joking to say that the focus is strict~), while the same lens's focusing performance on K3 is very fast and reliable~(focusing performance of the left and right ends at 1.4 aperture is still unsatisfactory. More than 2.8 is relatively reliable) And the new area focusing mode is also very easy to use, and I feel it is more reliable than point focusing. (Previously, when K52 was equipped with * 55 1.4 aperture, the pasting ratio was at least 40%. Of course, manual interference can reduce the pasting rate to a certain extent, but it takes a lot of time. When K3 is equipped with * 55 1.4 aperture, the pasting rate of more than 1500 shots in different environments is generally less than 10%, almost no need for focus compensation. It is trustworthy) The increase of focus really helps the composition~but 3. The high feeling performance is also improved well~the image quality below ISO800 is acceptable (I can't accept the performance above K5 ISO400~)

1. K3 has a problem with red~(K5 is for purple) This may be because of the second problem to be mentioned below 2. The white balance of K3 is not accurate enough (the white balance of K5 is relatively reliable). In particular, the automatic white balance is not reliable in complex light environments, which often requires manual adjustment. This may be the reason that affects the red performance of K3~ 3. The support for other manufacturers' WIFI cards is not very good (the special WIFI card has not been started yet, and I don't know how it performs) 4. The switch keys for focus adjustment and function operation have been changed, and they are still not used to the fact that they often need to leave the viewfinder to find new keys (the switch key of K5 is the "ok" j key, which is very handy)

In general, K3 has inherited Pentax's consistent solid, reliable, user-friendly and other qualities, while improving its focus, resolution and high sense of performance in three aspects is very sincere. I think the white balance problem and the switch key problem can be corrected when the firmware is upgraded. Personally, I'm very satisfied with K3~~~

The industrial design is first-class, the body material is first-class, the durability is first-class, the performance and control are first-class, the quality and price are first-class, the picture quality and color are first-class, the continuous shooting taste is first-class, the video performance is first-class, the current half picture is first-class, and the metering and focusing are first-class.

Second class endurance, second class lens selection, second class high sense performance, second class after-sales maintenance.

About 6500 yuan, definitely worth having.

The color imaging is very beautiful. I feel that the color of NC is not as good as that of Pentax.

Motion focus should be weaker. After all, motion photography is rarely used.