Pentax K-5 II

The quality of the fuselage is very good, with a sense of precision. The imaging color is good. Waterproof socket work is really finished blasting NC socket. All the indicators are very suitable, there is no obvious weakness, the focusing speed in bright areas is good, and the dark areas are also OK. Very good handling, easy to use, but also to meet more complex needs.

Focus on the disadvantages: 1. We have to complain about focusing. The central focus is a box, which is slightly larger, and it is not easy to focus on small targets; If the target contrast is too high, the focus is almost in contrast mode, and the objects with lower contrast cannot be aligned; The success rate of one time focusing is not high, and it is easy to focus incorrectly. 2. The av file will not be exposed correctly (don't spray me, the metering mode, scene lighting, scene color, and the impact of accessories have been checked, but 2ev serious under exposure will still occur randomly). I don't know about the TV, Tav and P files. I usually use the M file. 3. The picture has a strong sense of graininess. Even ISO100 has a clear sense of graininess. To put it bluntly, this should be the reason why cmos signal processing circuit technology can't keep up. However, it is not very influential. Noise reduction in the later stage is OK. (responsibly, there is little color noise, and many details can be retained after noise reduction). 4. The touch of keys is not very good. They are either too hard to redial or too soft. It is estimated that the reason is waterproof? Of course, the most painful thing for me is that the keys are all plastic, and the shell is all metal. Can't the keys be thick? I always feel that the metering mode paddle will be disconnected by me. 5. Give more strength to the lens group. Many of them are hyped up. In fact, their quality is very ordinary. If it is not for the powerful color of smc, there will be no advantage.

Sad for his misfortune, but don't argue with him. After leaving it to Ricoh, he switched to painting.

It is small and convenient to travel. It is not as bulky as Canon Nikon, a colleague. It looks cool and has good texture. Focus is the same as my sony phone. It is fast and quiet. Photos are better than phones. What else do the newcomers know

The newcomer didn't compare and didn't know. He said he was 70D better than his colleague

It's better than my sony mobile phone. I bought it from Amazon 4800 and didn't play much. It's good to see the standard lens all over the world. Colleagues say it's worth a lot. Anyway, I don't understand The pictures can't be passed on big, but can only be passed on to experts for guidance. I want to get started and play. I like Pentax a little, which is better than mobile phones