Canon 450D

After playing for 6D, I suddenly felt that my fever had subsided seriously, and I didn't think it was interesting to pursue equipment.. More than 20000 pieces of equipment were lost, and they were empty handed. However, because acquaintances often took photos, they casually entered a 450D+Nissan A16 with good quality to do some work. Unexpectedly, this set of gadgets in the early 2K's was amazing and did not lose focus. Maybe it was Nissan's, and the A16's sharpness was also gratifying. To be honest, the imaging of APSCs in low sense is similar to that of 700D. High sensitivity and 1600ISO emergency are also available, and under the aperture of A16 2.8, the sensitivity above 800 is rarely used. In addition, there is no big difference between the operating feeling and that of a single digit computer. Even the plastic slippers in those years are easy to handle.

To tell you the truth, do I have the heart to tell the shortcomings of the 95 new cars with less than 1K? What I want to say is that the screen is almost there. I am used to seeing screens above 90W+, but I am not used to it, but it is not hard to accept. There seems to be no video? But I played SLR for several years without using video. Personally, I think that if it is bought for rough use, this one and the 500D are both good, but the 400D is not good. It is inconvenient to use a CF card without LV.

Instead of spending 2K to buy a card machine, it is better to buy a set of 450d+A16. Low sensitivity imaging will kill all the card machines in production on the market, and it will not be inferior to the F4 standard change on the whole set. It is an invincible choice to find a machine to work for the fever.

Since 2008, I have played a lot of games for me. I have used them on various occasions.

To tell you the truth, 450D is a little old.

Accompanied me for five years, good guy!