In the past two days, "acting bravely for a just cause" prevented female neighbors from being invaded into the house, and the incident of being detained for 14 days on suspicion of intentional injury caused widespread concern in the national public opinion. Many media and netizens have been defending Zhao Yu, a man who "acted bravely for a just cause", and directed their criticism at another party, the "perpetrator" Li, and the public security department who detained Zhao.
On the contrary, "acting bravely for a just cause" was detained and faced with huge compensation. Seeing such a scenario, people with a little sense of justice would jump and swear, which is simply black and white. Then, with the media's investigation of this matter, more and more details emerged. For example, as a "violent person", Mr. Li not only did not receive the relevant punishment, but also played mahjong while being interviewed by the media; For another example, Mr. Li called Zhao Yu's father in private and asked for privacy on the condition that his sentence could be commuted. Such a plot seems to be developing in the direction of netizens' imagination. Good people are wronged and bad guys are arrogant.
But in fact, at present, the media may not be so clear about the presentation of relevant parties. For example, the injured woman said that Li intended to rape, and then she resisted the call for help. But the question is, after Li reported the case, why did the woman not tell the truth to the police at that time? There is no reliable argument for this doubt. Especially now, the two parties have different opinions on many details, which on the contrary makes the matter even more clouded. If too much attention is paid to such details as "whether Mr. Li was invited upstairs by a woman" and "whether Zhao Yu knew the injured woman", the core issue of the incident will be ignored, that is, whether Mr. Li was actually committing violence when Zhao Yu "acted bravely".
Therefore, the purpose of this matter is to restore the scene. Some lawyers believed that whether Zhao Yu was in "self-defense" had nothing to do with whether "an unknown man attempted to rape". The key was whether the woman was subjected to violence at that time, which depended on the evidence. However, the current evidence is mainly the opinions of both sides at that time, as well as the investigation reports of some media. There is no more "solid" evidence like monitoring, let alone the reliable and authoritative characterization and conclusions of the authoritative departments.
From the present evidence, Zhao Yu's statement seems to be more credible. He not only restored many details of the scene, but also had strong circumstantial evidence from the injured woman and neighbors. In addition, the "decision not to approve the arrest" made by the Procuratorate is also a very favorable support for Zhao Yu to a certain extent. At present, the public security department has been involved in the investigation, and it is believed that the final truth will soon be known to the society.
In addition, in this matter, more attention should be paid to the social mentality reflected by the one-sided public opinion. I'm afraid there is also a simple justice view of the majority of netizens: good people should be rewarded, and bad people should be brought to justice. I'm afraid that people here are more likely to use "Zhao Yu's story" to pour out their dissatisfaction with the indifferent society. People hope that justice will be upheld and more heroes will appear. This simple desire should be paid attention to and encouraged. However, for a rational society, all value judgments, right and wrong judgments should be based on the truth. Before the truth is known, what we can do is probably to wait for the truth. Without truth, where can justice come from?
Therefore, it is urgent for the local public security department to verify and implement all the doubts and details as soon as possible. If Zhao Yu is truly a righteous man, he should be given justice and even some compensation, rather than hurting the hearts of the righteous and the simple sense of justice of netizens.
