On the morning of 19th, a female passenger reappeared on the G6078 train from Yongzhou to Shenzhen North. It is understood that the woman's seat marked on the bus ticket is near the aisle. After getting on the bus, she did not seat according to the seat on the ticket and insisted on sitting next to the window. The coordination was unsuccessful, and the passenger who was sitting near the window of the original ticket complained to the police. On the scene, the police repeatedly communicated with the female passenger who dominated the seat, but the female passenger refused to give up her seat. The passengers beside took this video of the police negotiating with them. At present, the railway department is still investigating and handling this matter.
After the exposure of the high-speed rail "seat hogging man" last month, many people may think that the network exposure, public opinion condemnation and subsequent punishment for dishonesty will let the latecomers learn from it. But less than a month later, the female version of "ZuoBa" appeared again, which undoubtedly exceeded people's common sense expectations.
In terms of the specific plot, this time is slightly different. Last time, the person involved knew that he had taken someone else's seat, but he was unwilling to change it; This time, I ignored the difference between the window seat and the aisle seat and insisted that my seat was right, just like "I am reasonable". Which seat number is by the window and which is by the aisle? In fact, the vehicle has been marked. As long as you follow common sense, there will be no misunderstanding. The female passengers in this matter, whether they are pretending to be confused or ignorant, can hardly hide the fact that they are unreasonable and dominate the seats. In reality, some passengers may prefer window seats. As long as they reach a consensus with other passengers to exchange seats in private, it is also understandable. However, if you blindly "use strong words" or even "reverse black and white" to become a "dominant seat", it will obviously change the flavor.
Last time, Sun, the "seat hogging man", was fined 200 yuan by the Jinan Railway Public Security Bureau, and was included in the blacklist of dishonesty. He was restricted to take all train seats within 180 days. The investigation of this incident is still under way, but it can be predicted that the punishment for "seat hogging women" will not be lower than the last standard. This also reminds more people that "throwing" on vehicles in disregard of the rules will not work. It will not only face moral condemnation, but also be suspected of violating the rules and must accept the corresponding legal punishment. The repeated occurrence of similar events may be precisely because some people think it is a "small matter", at most it is immoral, and the law can't help itself, thus indulging their "selfishness".
Some people questioned whether the same thing happened again in the short term, indicating that the punishment of the last event was too light. Whether the punishment is appropriate can certainly be discussed, but what needs to be clarified is that the handling of similar "seat hogging" behaviors may not necessarily depend on improving the punishment, but the key is to make the punishment clear, so as to form a stable rule expectation for the society. Just as smoking on the high-speed railway is explicitly prohibited, there are few violations. The most important reason is that the rules against "smoking on the high-speed railway" and the corresponding punishment have already been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, so there are fewer passengers who are lucky.
In fact, in the last incident, the reason why "seat hogs" were finally punished was directly related to exposure and public pressure. If you don't enter the public opinion arena, it may end up dead, but the treatment of "seat hogging men" is a precedent, and sends a clear signal to the society that "seat hogging" needs to pay a legal price. It is reasonable to believe that as long as the disposal of such events is no longer determined by whether they are exposed, but forms a rigid atmosphere for the implementation of rules, there is no need to worry about the "seat hegemony" will continue to run rampant and become a stubborn disease that can not be cured. Of course, in this incident, the seat hogging behavior of the passengers involved was still not corrected in time, but could only be investigated later, which also warned that the emergency handling capacity of the train needs to be improved.
