Ubiquitin(ubiquitin)It is a kind ofEukaryote(MostEukaryotic cell)Small proteins in.Ubiquitin consists of 76amino acid composition, molecular weight is about 8.451kDa.Its main function is to mark what needs to be decomposedprotein, making it 26SProteasomeDegradation.26S proteasome upregulationSubunitSome receptors on K48 and K11 can recognize polyubiquitinated proteins linked by K48 and K11. The 20S core subunit is located in ATPaseEnergy supplyLower hydrolysis substrate.Ubiquitin can also label transmembrane proteins and participate in thevesicular transport。Atypical ubiquitin chain inCell signal transduction,Endocytosis, andDNA damage repair, RegulationNF-κBIt plays an important role in the pathway.It has a high degree ofConservatism96% of human and yeast ubiquitinsSimilarity。
Ubiquitin is a kind of ubiquitous in eukaryotic cellsSmall moleculeProtein, 76 in sizeAmino acid residue。Ubiquitin can pass throughEnzymatic reactionAnd then mediate the degradation of target proteins.
The whole process of the occurrence of a series of catalytic reactions is called ubiquitination signaling pathway.In the first step, ubiquitin activating enzyme (also called E1) hydrolyzesATPAnd a ubiquitin moleculeAdenylateChange.Next, ubiquitin is transferred to E1active centerOfCysteineResidueWith adenosylation of the second ubiquitin molecule.The adenosylated ubiquitin molecule is then transferred to the second enzyme, ubiquitinConjugating enzyme(E2).Finally, highly conservativeUbiquitin ligaseA member of the (E3) family (depending on the substrate protein) recognizes specific target proteins that need to be ubiquitinated, and catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin molecules from E2 to target proteins.It is generally believed that the target protein isProteasomeBefore recognition, the polyubiquitin chain formed by at least four ubiquitin monomers at K48 or K11 must be labeled. However, the latest research shows that the ubiquitin chain formed by two ubiquitin monomers can be more effectively degraded by proteasome.In general, E3 makes this system substrate specific, and E2 or E2-E3 determines the type of ubiquitin chain on the substrate.The amount of E1, E2 and E3 proteins depends on the organism and cell type. There are a lot of different E3 proteins in the human body, which indicates thatUbiquitin proteasome systemIt can act on a large number of target proteins.
How polyubiquitinated proteins are recognized by proteasomes has not been fully understood.The N terminal of ubiquitin receptor protein has a ubiquitin like proteinDomain, and one or more ubiquitin binding domains.Ubiquitin like domains can be identified by 19S regulatory particles, while ubiquitin binding domains can bind ubiquitin by forming triple helix bundles.These receptor proteins may be able to bind polyubiquitinated proteins and carry them toProteasomeHowever, the specificity and regulatory mechanism of this binding are still unclear.Finally, the labeled protein isproteaseIt is decomposed into smaller polypeptidesamino acidAnd ubiquitins that can be reused.
In retrospect of the discovery of ubiquitin, we cannot but mention two pioneering studies.The discovery of ubiquitin dates back half a century. In 1953, Simpson used theradio isotopeconductMetabolism experiment, published“Biological cellInProteolysisMedium needsMetabolic energyThat is, those requiring ATPWater decomposition”Thesis of.However, this epoch-making research has been ignored for a long time.at that timethermodynamicsAdd waterdecomposition reactionIt is the capacity response, and the energy requiredSynthetic reactionDifferent, this process does not require energy.Another pioneering research is Goldberg et al.'s paper (1977), which reported the phenomenon observed by Simpson reproduced in vitro.This paper wakes up Simpson's discovery sleeping at the bottom of the library.Goldberg et alred blood cellOfExtractThe addition of ATP significantly promotes protein decomposition, that is, energy consumption is accompanied by protein decomposition.In this discovery, selectReticulocyteIt is unique.Goldberg et al. noticed that when reticulocytes finally differentiate into red blood cells, they no longer need nuclei,Organelle,lysosomeThe protein in the cell decomposes rapidly in the cell, that isprotein synthesisAmong the active reticulocytes, its decomposition activity is also very high.It can be said that this choice determines everything.In fact, if ATP was not added to the reticulocyte extract, Simpson'sexperimental observation The discovery of ubiquitin may be many years away.ATPdependenceThe discovery of proteolysis in vivo suggests a possible biochemical mechanism.
The above research and other informationProteolysisThe miraculous phenomenon of is beginning to attract people's attention.In the early 1960s, we found organelles full of hydrolytic enzymes--lysosomeTherefore, it is considered as the main organ for protein decomposition.But the non selective destruction mode of lysosome is difficult to explain thatOrganelleThe contradiction between protein individuals with different life span and expression levels.However, at that time, this was only a minority opinion and gradually disappeared.But in the 1970s, with the lysosomal functioninhibitorThe cells treated with these reagents still have constantProteolysisIt is difficult to inhibit, which indicates that there is a protein decomposition system different from lysosome. Based on these observations, it was called "non lysosomal protein decomposition system" at that time.Before long, this "non lysosomal protein decomposition system" was combined with the aforementioned "ATP dependent protein decomposition system".
In order to maintain the acidic pH in lysosomes and organellesMetabolic energyHowever, these energies come from the role of membrane ATP pump (ATPase), which is similar to that observed by Goldberg et alcytoplasmOfEnergy consumptionThe mechanism of is completely different.Actually, likeEscherichia coliSuch organelle freeprokaryoteThe protein decomposition ofProteolytic enzymeSystem and lysosomal system exist independently of each other.Then, the ATP dependent proteolytic enzyme Lon enzyme (commonserineProtease and ATP pumpEnzyme structureOfMultifunctional enzyme)。Goldberg et al. believed thatEukaryotic cellATP dependent proteolytic enzymes also exist in. At that time, the Goldberg team who discovered and established the reticulocyte system also had absolute confidence in discovering the ATP dependent mechanism, but there was an unexpected scenario in this big play, which took away all the glory they expected to win in "discovering the ATP dependent protein decomposition mechanism in eukaryotic cells",It is the superstars Hershko and Varshavsky who break the dream of Goldberg's team
From the Identification of APF-1 to the Discovery of Ubiquitin
Hershko advocated“Inducible enzyme”And the famous Tomkin Research Lab reportedSteroid hormoneInducedTyrosineTransferasesOfhalf lifeSignificantly shortened, whichCatabolismEnergy is required.In 1971, he returned to his motherlandIsrael, continueProteolysisIn 1977, he was inspired by Goldberg et al., who used reticulocytes, and other related papers such as "ATP dependent proteolysis system", and worked with Ciechanover, who was a graduate student at that time, to explore its mechanism.They are separated by chemical methods,purificationStage related factors in reticulocyte extract.Soon, in 1978, the "Phase 1" of DEAE cellulose method and the high concentration of adsorption were obtainedSalting outPhase 2 of.Fortunately, these operations are only commonly used tored blood cellInternal massivehemoglobinBiochemical analysis method for removal.It is almost difficult to see the promoting effect of ATP in Phase 1 and Phase 2 alone, but when they are mixed, the promoting effect of ATP can be observed.This result shows that the ATP dependent protein decomposition pathway is complex and was published in BBRC (1978) in the form of bulletin.They regard this essay as their most proud achievement, and even in their speeches, they often mention it.
Shortly thereafter, the ATP dependent proteolysis factor (APF-1) was successfully purified in Phase 1.APF-1 Yesthermal stabilityGood small molecule protein.At that time, it was assumed that APF-1 existed in Phase 2 and had not yet been identifiedProteolytic enzymeI125 labeled APF-1 was used to detect its interacting molecules.But the results showed a surprising phenomenon. 125I-APF-1 appeared in the form of polymer ladder, and it was clear that this modification reaction was carried out in ATP with waterdecomposition reactionIs necessary.It was natural for this phenomenon to be regarded as polyubiquitination, but it was not difficult to imagine their surprise at that time.Different from the original expectation, in 1980, APF-1 was considered as the substrate protein and the energy consumedCovalentCombined products.
Now it is necessary to introduce the history of ubiquitin research, first in 1975,GoldsteinThink of it asThymic hormoneHowever, it was soon clear that it was just a mixture of substances in the sample, that is, ubiquitin was a "wrongly discovered molecule".But it was in this research that the name "Ubiquitin" was created and spread in the history books.Goldstein et alHistiocyteIt is ubiquitous inuniversality(ubiquity), called ubiquitin.In 1977, Goldknopf and Buschcell cycleIn the study of chromosomeHistoneDifferent from 2APeptide chainThe bound molecule is ubiquitin.This article, "Ubiquitin covalently binds to protein", brings light to clarify the mechanism of Ubiquitin modification reaction.Then, in 1980, Hershko and his co researchers proved that APF-1 and ubiquitin are the same substance.The function of ubiquitin was verified again.
Hershko's Ubiquitin Hypothesis
Soon Hershko and Ciechanover proposed the hypothesis that ubiquitin plays a basic role in protein decomposition: ubiquitin passes E1 (activating enzyme), E2 (binding enzyme), E3(Ligase)Multi level reactions, covalently binding with the target protein, most of the ubiquitin molecules are branched together to form polyubiquitin chains, and polyubiquitin chains become markers of proteolytic enzyme attacks, and the target protein captured is rapidly decomposed.This "ubiquitin hypothesis" was later widely praised.The gist of this hypothesis is thatMetabolic energyIt is necessary for ubiquitin activation. Conceptually, ATP is consumed in the signal formation of protein decomposition.This hypothesis is completely different from the concept of ATP dependent proteolytic enzyme predicted by Goldberg et al., and this explanation of energy dependent protein decomposition mechanism is no less than a thunder in sunny days.It is necessary to note that this series of studies was conducted bybiochemistryMethods, andMolecular Biology TechnologyNo connection.
In the first five years when Hershko and Ciechanover proposed the ubiquitin hypothesiscompetitorThis is extremely rare in peaceful times.Of course, this is also related to the fact that people at that time could not believe this "unimaginable phenomenon at that time"reliabilityPeople always cast suspicious eyes.This is alsoOriginalityHas reached the realm of transcendence,be too highbrow to be popularA typical example of.But this kind of originality is too high and often brings some misfortune.Because it is beyond common sense, Nature, Science and other world-class magazines do not believe their findings and refuse to publish them for a long time.
Study on the Genetics of Varshavsky
In the proof of the in vitro effect of the ubiquitin system, Varshavsky and his co researchers, who have many students (Finley, Jentsch, Hochstrasser, etc.), have made the greatest contribution, and are still active as leaders in the world.Varshavsky in 1977Soviet UnionMoscowchromosomeThe institute emigrated to the United StatesbostonOfMIT(MIT)。At that time, he was mainly engaged in chromosome research. Because of this relationship, he noticed Goldknopf and Busch's report on ubiquitin modification, and studied the chromosome related functions of ubiquitinated histone H2A.Taking this opportunity, around 1980, Varshavsky began to use theReverse geneticsUbiquitin system is studied by using the.Then, the yeast genes corresponding to E1, E2, E3 and other enzyme groups identified by Hershko et al. in biochemistry were isolated one by one.These studies will clarify the function of ubiquitin chain as the actual signal decomposition in cells, and remove the hypothesis of "ubiquitin hypothesis" from the text.At the same time, they have made many prospective research results related to ubiquitin system through a series of genetic studies.At that time, a series of papers published in Nature, Science and Cell swept the world of protein decomposition in five years.Considering the impact of their research on later generations, their work is worthy of great praise.
As a wonderful example, the "ubiquitin hypothesis" still has a major defect from the perspective of energy dependent protein decomposition mechanism, which is that ubiquitin modification is just a device for ATP consumption.In 1983, the author and Goldberg proved that the ubiquitin modifiedProteolysisIt still needs ATP to decompose by adding water, so it advocates the "two-stage theory of ATP dependence in the process of protein decomposition".That is to say, although it has been proved that ubiquitin acts as an energy dependent signal attachment mechanismProteolytic enzymeThe concept of "attack marker" is correct, but actually the protein decomposition after ubiquitin modification still needs energy.The key point of this hypothesis lies in the molecular mechanism of ATP consumption as the second, andprokaryoteSame,EukaryoteThe same ATP dependent proteolytic enzyme also exists.This means that Goldberg's prediction before the debut of Ubiquitin was half correct.This inference led to the discovery of ATP dependent proteolytic enzymes called proteosomes.Proteasome first appeared inscienceIt's 1988 in the magazine, but I understand itmolecular structureMore than 10 years later.The reason for taking such a long time is that this enzyme body is the largest and most complex molecular aggregate in the history of life science with a molecular weight of 2.5 million and a total sub base of 100.
Proteasome isProteolytic enzymeThe discovery of novel enzyme bodies, which are totally different in concept, can be called a TV series.As one of the parties involved in the discovery of this enzyme body and its subsequent research progress, I regret that I will not be able to tell the story of the discovery of proteolytic enzymes here. However, interested readers canGo to seemyPersonal homepage
This article only tells the story of the discovery of ubiquitin, and it is difficult to summarize the subsequent progress of ubiquitin research in a word or two.The biological leap development of ubiquitin dependent protein decomposition system has led to the discovery of more and more diseases and patients related to it.This article only wants to describe an example of the research on its biological discovery precursors.In 1980cell cycleA Japanese research team(The University of TokyoEmeritus professorMasato Yamada et al.) can induceChromosomal abnormalitySolidification temperatureReceptivityAnd reported that the modified cells were found when cultured at unrestricted temperatureHistoneThe ubiquitin of H2A disappears.At that time, Varshavsky, who studied the ubiquitination of histones, noticed this paper and obtained ts85 cells, which confirmed the existence of ts85 cellsubiquitin-activating enzymeE1 mutation, and the use of this cell proves that ubiquitin is involved in short-lived protein decomposition.This 1984 report was the first landmark paper on the physiological function of ubiquitin system in cells.At the same time, the study of ts85 cells has become an important means to study the importance of ubiquitin in the control of cell cycle.
In 1983, Hunt discovered thatcell divisionCyclinB, a periodically changing protein, was published in 1991 by Hershko's team and Kirschner,cell cycleFrom then on, a new page was opened.Then Hershko separated the cyclinB ubiquitinated E3 ligase by biochemical method and named it cyclosome.This somewhat exaggerated name comes from the huge difference between the ubiquitized CyclinB and its 20S.But cyclosome was also cast a skeptical eye at first."Is the so-called E3 enzyme the combination product of membrane or other unidentified molecules?".In 1996, there was an event that completely dispelled these doubts.Several different research teams around the world have explored the molecular structure of cyclosome, also known as APC (anaphase promoting complex).The results proved that APC is a giant molecular complex composed of more than 10 subunits.The enzyme is readily available as APC/C.next,Kyoto UniversityProfessor Yoshida Kazuhiro and Kim Nasmyth, through isolation of abnormal yeast induced in chromosomes being isolatedgenome, clarifying the composition of APC/CSubunitAnd its target molecules in most cases.This is to prove thatcell cycleControlling the crucial event of the importance of ubiquitin dependent proteolysis system.This result reveals the mystery of abnormal chromosome coagulation of ts85 cells at impermissible temperatures, and also makes it possible toCell cycle M phaseThat is, the research on the mechanism of chromosome allocation has reached the molecular level.In the future study of cell cycle, the importance of ubiquitin system has become increasingly important.Especially new products such as SCF and Mdm2Ubiquitin ligaseThe discovery of Ubiquitin and the study on them confirmed the central role of ubiquitin dependent protein decomposition in the regulation of check point in the smooth progress of cell cycle.These results established that the cell cycle was controlled by protein phosphorylation and ubiquitinProteolysisThe concept of control is called the greatest achievement of cancer research in recent years.
Later research on ubiquitin
It has been 20 years since Finley, Ciechanover and Varshavsky used ts85 cells in 1984 and published the article "Ubiquitin is related to intracellular protein decomposition" in Cell magazine.In 2004, Cell magazine published the recollection article of the client to commemorate this discovery.According to Pickart's memory related to this discovery, there were less than 100 articles related to ubiquitin in 1984 and more than 1000 in 2003.This also reflects the rapid development of ubiquitin research from the side.And inlife sciencesEvery issue of Nature, Science and Cell, the top journals in the field, carries the topic of "Ubiquitin", and the research on Ubiquitin is still in rapid development without decline.Ubiquitin -Proteolytic enzymeBody as the determinant of numerousLiving bodyThe response can be rapid, sequential,Transitory, reasonable means of one-way operationcell cycle, apoptosis,Metabolic regulation,immune response,signal transmission ,Transcription control, quality management, stress response,DNA repairIt has become an unshakable fact that many fields in life science have played a central role.
The research on ubiquitin has also achieved unexpected results.For example, in the study of ubiquitination of histones initially mentioned, it is also clear that ubiquitin also hasProteolysisExternal functions, such asPinocytosis,Vesicle transportSelection of,VirusesThe material circulation system in cells such as budding, or DNA repair,Translation controlUbiquitin plays a role in signal transmissionSignal moleculeRole of.To take another example, there are many ubiquitin like molecules (i.e. ubiquitin like proteins) in cells, which independently form a huge "protein protein"After translationOfDecoration system”。They are critical to theGenetic informationThe control of amplification gene can play a role in genePhantomFeatures not available on.What is more surprising is that the gene population associated with ubiquitin accounts for 2-3% of the total number of genes.Ubiquitin is really a common protein.
Hershko, Ciechanover, Varshavsky, who made contributions to the discovery of ubiquitin, were awarded Albert Lasker Award in 2000.The FASEB Summer Conference "Ubiquitin and Protein Degradation" sponsored by ershko, Goldberg, Varshavsky, etc. has made great contributions to the research progress of ubiquitin.The first session was held in 1989, the next year, and the eighth session was held in 2004.In the first session, the participants were mainly the above three great men and their disciples.It's just a small gathering of ubiquitin researchers.Now, this situation has changed. More than half of the participants are young researchers whom the author does not know.In addition, since 2003, CSHsymposiumIn the future, the two meetings will be held alternately every year.And aboutProteolytic enzymeThe 6th Proteasome Workshop will be held in Clermont Ferrand (France) in 2005.In addition to these regular international meetings, Keystone Symposium and EMBO Workshop also frequently hold irregular meetings on the topic of ubiquitin.From these circumstances, Ubiquitin is in a period of vigorous development.But unfortunately, what the world will be like after the climax is still unknown.Can it really bring good news to the understanding of life, or is it still lingering in the abyss of mystery.As for the author, although he does not expect a long life span, he wants to bid farewell to the world when his research on ubiquitin sees the end of the dawn.
Ubiquitin effect
Announce
edit
Nobel Prize in Chemistry
In 2000, Hershko, Ciechanover, Varshavsky won Albert LaskerBasic MedicineAward.This award is said that half of its winners will winNobel PrizeSince then, Ubiquitin has been regarded as a candidate for the Nobel Prize.In the second year, 2001, the 34th Nobel Society, entitled "Regulation of cellular function by the ubiquitin proteasome system"StockholmKarolinska Research Institute, in addition to Hershko, Ciechanover, Varshavsky, Goldberg and otherscell cycle, immunology, neurology and other experts in this field.Then, as we all know, in 2004, Hershko, Ciechanover, Rose and other three people won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Both the parties concerned and the researchers in related fields welcomed and surprised the Nobel Prize.Because "Rose instead of Varshavsky" and "Chemistry award instead of medical physiology award" unexpectedly.
Related impacts
Rose uses ATPEnzyme reactionThe authority of science, together with Hershko and Ciechanover, conducted research at the early stage and made great contributions to the exploration of the mechanism of ubiquitin modification reaction.Since then, he has also made extraordinary achievements in talent cultivation.These three scholars have made great contributions in advocating the ubiquitin hypothesis by biochemical means at the beginning.
In my personal opinion, it is really regrettable that Varshavsky failed to win the Nobel Prize.Without Varshavsky's outstanding work, the current research on ubiquitin would be difficult to expand to the current level.Moreover, Varshavsky has published dozens of papers on the ubiquitin system in Nature, Cell, Science and other journals.In contrast, the number of 3 winners was almost 0.Perhaps this represents modern genetic engineering,molecular biologyWith the rapid development of modern technology, such progress itself should bring about significant progress in human gene analysispersonal useBased on previous chemistry andenzymologyThe basic so-calledLow techThe discovery of this new concept is of great significance.Therefore, awarding the Nobel Prize is a recognition of the original discovery.Nobel Committee It is to flaunt oneself to commend this "initial discovery".The modern highly developed life science has produced a large number of papers in mass production, and this award of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry can also be said to be a special warning for this truly original discovery.
Another thing is that after winning this prizenatureAnecdotes published.Hershko planned to go swimming with his granddaughter the day after the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology was announced, but he got the news of being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry from his cousin (the Nobel Committee was informed by telegraphLaureateBefore that, a short message was broadcast, and the cousin who heard the news informed me).In other words, it is extremely unexpected to win the chemistry prize.Yes, in recent years, the research of ubiquitin has been expanding in medicine, pathological physiology and other fields. Many people think that the prize of medical physiology should be awarded, but in fact, it is a chemical prize.This chemistry prize, it is necessary to focus on protein asligandIs uniqueRegulatory mechanismDiscovery of andBiological significanceThis focus problem should be correctly understood.Hershko's wisdom, Ciechanover's excellent technology andMobilityRose's profound knowledge of enzymology, as a result of the joint efforts of three scientists with different personalities and talents, established the hypothesis that ubiquitin is a signal of protein decomposition.From the contributions of these three people to the establishment of basic concepts, I think I can probably understand the significance of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.