In a word: Toss!
It is very meaningful for teachers to write teaching plans. New teachers, in particular, should try to write detailed cases.
To write a qualified teaching plan, teachers need to go through complex processes such as studying textbooks, carefully reading teaching references, analyzing learning conditions, collecting materials, integrating resources, determining ideas, designing activities, preset effects, and writing exercises. The whole process is time-consuming and labor-intensive. It usually takes two or three classes to prepare a class, and new teachers may take longer.
However, it is meaningful to "write a lesson plan" rather than "write a lesson plan".
Nowadays, most front-line teachers are busy in class, management, meeting, correcting homework&papers, talking to students, receiving parents (including phone calls), and dealing with various chores during working hours... Most teachers can only use the time after work to prepare lessons, write teaching plans, read books, and do scientific research. Our teacher has no overtime pay, but we work overtime every night. In this case, we should put efficiency first and use various means to reduce the unnecessary consumption in form. Do not write if you can print, and do not print if you can paperless. Old teachers who are not good at computer typing and are used to handwriting will write teaching plans. Young teachers who are used to typing will write electronic teaching plans. It is environmentally friendly and human, so there is no need to cut across the board. Moreover, no teacher can guarantee to write excellent teaching plans at one time. All good teaching plans are constantly improved and honed. The school collects the teaching plan, and the teachers start from scratch when they rewrite the new semester. This is not conducive to improving the professional level of teachers.
So why do some leaders of some schools have to hand write?
Is it to urge teachers to practice calligraphy? Is it to improve the teaching level? Is it to inherit the glorious history and culture of the school? To put it bluntly, it is just to harass the teacher.
Use administrative orders to force subordinates to do meaningless things, gradually dispel their sense of resistance, so as to facilitate their own management.
This method is most common in troops and schools. Every school has more or less such rules (only rules for teachers). For example, the teacher's dress and hairstyle, the number of assignments, and the layout of the classroom should be specified.
**All teaching that does not follow the cognitive laws of people is nonsense.
All regulations and orders lacking the support of educational teaching theory and practice are nonsense.