Sociology of crowding buses

June 1, 2019 928 point heat 1 liked it 0 comments

We will find an interesting phenomenon when we squeeze into the bus. Before we squeeze into the bus, we always yell to let us get on the bus. Everyone moves in, there is still room in it. When we get into the car, we start to hate other people's crowding up again. We will bluff and say, "it's too crowded to move. You wait for the next car and move your position reluctantly.".
In fact, there is no other change in our faces before and after getting on the bus. We are in different positions and have different interests. Once we occupy a favorable position in society, monopolize social resources, become successful people, and climb into the elite circle, we will instinctively have an impulse to raise the threshold, reduce competition and protect vested interests.
As long as we observe the society carefully, we can find many examples from the various phenomena. For example, in the officialdom, officials a feel that officials B will pose a threat to their own promotion, and they will try their best to suppress and exclude the other party. For example, in the economic field, monopoly enterprises are afraid that other enterprises will take a share, and they will take various measures to squeeze their rivals. For example, in the literary and artistic circles, it is not uncommon for famous directors and writers to suppress young directors and young writers... This is all due to the idea of squeezing into the car and not wanting others to rush in and grab their own "space". After all, competing for food with others is not comparable to eating alone! Most people who are in a rush to work will not believe what they say. The people on the bus want to exclude the competition, but the people under the car still try their best to squeeze in. The people on the bus can only reluctantly shrink back and endure the stinking sweat, suffocation and unhappy journey together.
However, if the elites and groups do not want to get on or off the bus, they will not only have the ability to prevent the elite and the group from taking up or leaving the bus, but if they do not have the ability to set the threshold for other people to get on or off the bus, they will not only be able to prevent the elite and the group from taking up or leaving the bus. In this case, the people under the car have two choices, one is to look at the car and sigh, or to get on the bus by force. The former is to swallow one's anger and accept the situation, while the latter is to fight against it; The former is the hidden danger in peace, and the latter is the conflict caused by contradictions.
As a result, it is not the people under the car, but the people on the car. They destroy the principle of fair competition under the market economy through monopoly; Or use the right of speech to create a strong voice; Or set up obstacles to block up and down the social flow channels, and eventually dominate a "bus", becoming the so-called special interest group. Such a "bus" is bound to deviate from the normal route.
Obviously, if we want to make it return to the normal driving route, we can only restore the "public" appearance of the bus, which requires some restrictions on the people who manipulate the bus. In addition, in the face of the "bus" where there is a shelter, people under the bus should not be afraid of being rejected by others, and they should not expect alms from others. Their rights must be fought for by themselves.


If life is just like the first sight, what is the sad autumn wind painting fan

Article review