I am no longer a middle school student, but I downloaded Baidu Homework Helper a few days ago to solve some middle school math problems in it, which can also be regarded as giving play to my professional expertise.

In general, I see that the questions are given several ideas. I hope the children who ask questions can think according to the ideas I have given, and then work out the questions themselves. I think that with such a thinking process, I should be able to have a deeper understanding of this knowledge point. The next time I encounter the same problem, I can do it myself.

In fact, few people would like to see my answer. After I gave my ideas, the next dialogue was "then", "you write about the process", "give me the results directly".

Is it just for the answer? The purpose of doing questions should be to understand the logical relationship among them, so as to exercise and improve the ability of thinking. However, such a blind focus on the results is against the original intention of the existence of these questions.

The result is important, but the most important thing should be the process of thinking. I think the same is true of examinations. The assessment should not be the result of questions, but the mastery of knowledge. The deeper level should be the development of thinking.

So is it necessary to choose and fill in the blanks in mathematical problems? Why not give all the calculation questions, proof questions and comprehensive questions? Students are required to write a detailed problem solving process, so that teachers' evaluation is not only based on the results, but also more focused on the problem solving process. It is easiest to see the ability and foundation from the problem solving process, so that the score of the test paper can more objectively reflect the students' level.
However, it also brings a series of problems, such as problem solving templates, more pressure on teachers, and more pressure on students

How can we be more scientific? This should also be one of the directions of future research.

All the above are my own opinions. It's hard to avoid being one-sided. I hope you can correct me.