Which is better, travel or Ctrip? With the liberalization of various policies, more and more people will take advantage of holidays or spare time to have an interesting and relaxing trip. Travel is not a simple matter. You should not only book various tickets, hotels and air tickets, but also make a comprehensive tourism strategy to greatly avoid stepping on the thunder. In China, there are many travel software to choose from, among which the most popular ones are Where to Travel and Ctrip. But just because the functions of these two travel software are very similar, but some prices and advertising promotion are not the same, so many small partners are struggling to choose where to travel or Ctrip. Don't worry. I have sorted out the pros and cons of these two software. You can refer to them!
Which is better, travel or Ctrip
Comparative analysis of where to travel and Ctrip:
1、 UI Comparison
1. Ctrip and Qunar both use the information grid similar to Windows Metro, which can be distinguished by different colors. Ctrip uses 3 columns for more information. Use approximate colors to divide functions (such as blue, sky blue, light purple). The excessive color and differentiation of each functional area are also moderate, easy to distinguish and look gorgeous and beautiful.
2. Qunar uses double columns. Compared with Ctrip, the information coverage is not good. At the same time, the division ratio of each block is not correct. The overall shape of the function block is too different, messy and aesthetic. Lack of excessive color, poor visual effect. In addition, Qunar will show a "fingerprint" on the functional color block after clicking, encouraging innovation but not commendable. Generally, people are very disgusted with fingerprints, so new words like "fingerprint collector" came into being.
3. The style of the lower column is also quite different. Ctrip uses the traditional four columns, and the home page is located at the bottom left corner, which is more consistent with daily habits; Where to go is a five point lower column, highlighted as a home button in the middle, slightly personalized. Although there is no absolute good or bad, in view of the fact that the author has pressed Qunar's "order" as the "homepage" for no less than 10 times, the cost of learning and adaptation of Qunar will be much higher than that of Ctrip.
2、 Ticket reservation
1. Back and forth transportation is a particularly important part of travel, and is also one of the core businesses of the two companies. When entering the interface, the first impression is that Ctrip is simple and clear, and where to go is messy and bloated. Surplus content will undoubtedly distract people's attention. Ctrip is suitable for those who are capable and efficient, and where to go is suitable for those who have only time left.
2. Ctrip divides ticket booking into four functional areas: "ticket query", "flight dynamics", "airport strategy", and "check-in". Each function is very detailed. The highlight is the phone in the upper right corner, with 24-hour dedicated service (it is said that it can solve any problem). Where to go is full screen stacking, leaving the remaining six functions below, of which "special ticket" and "price trend" are highlights.
3. The vote interface, Ctrip's default time sorting, is suitable for business people who are time sensitive, efficient, and go at will (with memory function, that is, the previous sorting shall prevail). The default price ranking of Qunar is suitable for students and social young people who like cheap prices. Ctrip's flight schedule is arranged from left to right, intuitive, clear and clear. Where to put it up and down, three rows of text are crowded together, so it is difficult to distinguish important information.
4. The ticket price will be slightly cheaper than that of Ctrip. At the same time, the number of flights is slightly more than that of Ctrip (more than that of China Eastern Airlines and Xiamen Airlines). After entering the details, we found that there would be a certain gap between the ticket price and the quotation of Qunar. In addition to selling tickets through official channels, other third-party organizations must purchase insurance ranging from 20 to 30. Although the amount is not large, it is also a overlord clause. In addition, due to the use of a third party to purchase tickets, the ticket prices are uneven, and at the same time, it gives people a feeling that there is no guarantee when they buy tickets. Compared with Ctrip's one-stop service, it lacks advantages.
Now let's share the good content about where to travel and Ctrip, hoping to provide effective help for everyone.
