Is there a better way to cope with being maligned by peers? At present, no one can surpass the No. 1 position, while our ranking has been rising and the original No. 2 position has been rotating, and the No. 2 position before our entry has always been theirs. Every time in the past six months, we have surpassed them in the ranking and will be given a bad rating by the previous one star after a few days

Posting 5 times Topped once Recommended 0 times Quality points: 1 star 94 post replies Historical exchange heat 25.81% Historical communication depth 0%
The title owner has always been conscientious and diligent in the principle of doing his own link. After more than a year of continuous hard work, the new link, in addition to the company's excellent product quality control, has been strictly checked and tested before each product is shipped, and any flaws will be picked out, Therefore, without any "S" list and review, it has now entered the second place in the sub category, and its score has become the highest in the category. (Although there are more scores for boutique links than us, the score is not as high as ours.). During this period, there was no one star or two stars' negative comments before they were made by their peers. At first, they thought that they would be too lazy to ignore them. Now, four or five of them have been made in half a year. Recently, our link performance is OK, and the other party has not stopped.

Why do you think it is a peer attack? 1. The commenter's account only commented on our link; 2. The BS has been linked for a long time, and no one can surpass the top position at present, while our ranking has been rising and the original second place has been rotating, and the second place before we entered the stadium has always been theirs. Every time in the past six months, we have surpassed them in the ranking for several days, and will be criticized by the previous one star; 4. We contact buyers and never pay attention to after-sales information.

... I thought I only wanted to learn to be a good person, but I didn't want to spend time studying how evil people do evil.

Do you have any better ways to deal with the problem of being criticized by peers?
Invited:

Recruitment Cat cross-border - Real person evaluation of celebrity video for cross-border promotion of Zhaodanmao outside the main website |+VX: FLA66668888 | Public account: promotion of Zhaodanmao outside the website

Approval from: jingmen zcmbaf kkfffu Daisy426 うそ Nanli 001 anan888 FelixZhiyu Pandas love sleeping Weil An xllllll pilipilihp Cray One hundred years of professional counterfeit sales More »

Amazon itself can delete malicious comments, but the success rate is different for everyone;
 
The Recruitment Cat can give you several solutions:
1. Amazon opens a case to apply for deleting malicious comments. The paths are [report a violation] and [product review]. The premise of opening a case is that you need to be reasonable. You can analyze the account with malicious comments. If you can see the details, you can see whether this account is an account that often leaves negative comments, and whether this account has left negative comments on different products.
2. Do off-site promotion to obtain a large number of orders for inviting comments on natural orders and off-site orders, and try to dilute the negative rating rate in a white hat way to restore the star rating of your link
3. Dilute the rating rate for off-site promotion, find people to evaluate, and improve your praise rate
4. If you really know which competitor it is, you can send an internal letter or contact the other party to ask the other party to delete the bad comments or warn
5. If the warning is invalid, you can find someone to give a bad review, or find a service provider to change his link into a dog...
 
I believe that the above methods can not only serve as a warning to competitors, but also make your link back to life

Please answer the question first Sign in or register

 Problem feedback
x  Click Consultation