How to judge the dispute case of sales contract

In the performance of many contracts involving loans, the common ambiguity of interest agreements is mainly reflected in the failure of clear and explicit description and regulation of key links such as the billing method of interest, the precise value of interest rate and the clear time limit for interest payment. For example, the contract only agreed to give a certain amount of interest, but did not specify the specific amount; Another example is that although it is mentioned that interest rates should change according to market conditions, there is a lack of clear reference basis to determine the referenced market standards. The ambiguity of such agreement is likely to cause various disputes and doubts between both parties during the performance of the contract.

Normally, if the parties concerned have not made a written agreement on the undertaking of joint and several liability, the judicial authorities will make a ruling in accordance with the express provisions of relevant national laws and regulations. In most cases, the parties concerned will be required to share the corresponding proportion of compensation liability according to their own fault. For example, when a contract dispute is involved, unless there is a clear agreement, each party should comprehensively weigh and consider factors such as the nature of the contract, the implementation status, and their mistakes in the performance of the contract, to determine the specific way to assume responsibility.

In most cases, the cost of compulsory enforcement notarization is usually borne by the party requesting the notarization. However, in a specific contract or agreement, both parties can also negotiate in advance and reach a consensus to determine which party will bear the cost. If the two parties have not made a clear agreement on this, or the agreement is unclear, according to the legal provisions, the party applying for notarization usually bears the corresponding costs.