absurd! The teacher of the medical school was fined 2000 yuan and qualified for excellence evaluation because he was late for class due to emergency rescue?

This is a small topic I wanted to write about before. It just happened that the news released by a blogger today was very suitable.

The blogger revealed that a clinical medical school of a university informed a teacher that he was 29 minutes late for class that day because of rescuing children, and was punished by the university with "withholding 2000 yuan of scholarship in May, circulating criticism and canceling the qualification for this year's award".

Are you weird?

In fact, they wrote clearly in their bulletin that students reported that the bell rang but the teacher did not arrive at the classroom on time. It is understood that the patient in the charge of Ms. Yu Li is in a critical condition, which may change at any time, and the risk of death is high. So she arrived at the department before teaching to check the condition of the child. During this period, the patient suffered from a slightly slow bilateral pupil emission, blood seepage at the neck tube, etc., which is suspected of cerebral hemorrhage, so she carried out emergency treatment. Miss Yu Li failed to report to the teaching and research office in time due to the tense situation, which eventually led to the late event

You see, they are very clear about what happened in the process, but they still have to punish this teacher Yu Li. What kind of idea is this?

"Seems like a prudish pursuit of fairness."

It has always been like this. It is understandable that Miss Yu Li was late to save people, but who will make up for the lost time of students, and who will safeguard the rights and interests of students?

Is it a prude?

Therefore, we should pay attention to both the head and the tail. The students were told to punish the teachers who were late. Teachers who are late to save people will be given a mitigated punishment because they are saving people.

Then it became "withholding 2000 yuan of scholarship in May, circulating a notice of criticism and canceling the qualification for this year's award"

They report the causes and consequences in detail and write down the punishment as a matter of course. Don't they just want to express that their own treatment is fair?

Is it fair?

What a bull.

If the whole process is like everything in the bulletin, then this way of dealing with problems, like "why should you help if you don't hit", is ridiculously stupid and is a very bad start.

Since being late to save lives will also be punished, how will the teachers choose in the future?

Of course, I won't be late. As long as I'm not late, nothing will happen. Is it the same as "why should you help if you didn't hit?"?

Don't help in the future.

Don't be late in the future.

Which is disadvantageous to oneself between helping others and being wronged? Which is bad for you, saving people or not being late? Are you stupid to choose against yourself?

Conclusion: In the future, it is the first principle for medical school teachers not to be late for the above class, and other big things should be put aside, including saving people, including other people's lives.

There is no bottom line.

After the four foreigners were stabbed last time, foreigners' comments appeared on the Internet. They were not surprised that there would be murderers in the society, but they thought it was normal. In the United States, such people are also common. However, they could not understand why there were so many people around and no one helped them. They even allowed the murderer to leave the scene.

It is inevitable that there are bad people in society, no matter where they are or in which country.

However, the bottom line of society exists. Each place may be different, but it should be roughly the same. Because no matter where you are, the subject is the same, all people.

What is the bottom line? Don't dare to surround bad people in Europe, for fear of being characterized as mutual Europe; Don't dare to act bravely, for fear of hurting the society after brave; Those who dare not help the fallen can't be helped by the court in case of a white eyed wolf; Now we have to add one more point. I dare not save people, and I will be punished if I am too late to give lessons to students

It's unbelievable. What kind of ghost is this? When students report that the teacher is late, doesn't the school just need to tell them that the teacher is saving people? If there is any student who is forced to refuse, you can directly greet your ancestors, and 99% of the people will say "+1", and no one will accuse you of violating the rights and interests of students.

Compared with a life, their rights and interests are nothing.

It seems that this is not the case.

In the last paragraph of that notice, it was written that "I hope all departments, teaching staff at all levels, teaching management personnel and teaching related personnel can take this as a warning, enhance their sense of responsibility, earnestly perform their job responsibilities, and ensure the stable operation of teaching order and the steady improvement of teaching quality."

How well said, take a warning. But I really don't know, what can we do to save people? Or something else?