This is simply a black humor: 700 million people are too many, and 1.4 billion people are too few. Will they settle accounts? It can be said that kindergarten teachers can not speak clearly, and university teachers can not speak clearly!
picture
In the same blue sky, the same piece of land, and the same China, how could the population policy have changed so dramatically 50 years ago: 50 years ago, when the population was 700 million, we worried about the rapid population growth and implemented family planning, one husband and one child. Fifty years later, there are 1.4 billion people today, but they are worried that the population is declining too fast, so they open the birth policy, encourage the birth of two or three children, and even some experts say that "no fines"!
The population of 700 million is too large, and the population of 1.4 billion is too small. In fact, this question is also asking whether the policy of "one couple, one child" was completely correct?
picture
If family planning had allowed a couple to have two children, wouldn't it have changed from five or six children to one child?
At the beginning, the population was too large, but when enjoying the demographic dividend, it was really called a "fragrance"! The labor resources are sufficient, and the national economic construction is advancing rapidly. When the demographic dividend was about to disappear, we realized the correctness of the teacher's statement that "more people, more power"! In other words, the real reason for the poverty of the country in those years was not that we had a large population, but that the productivity was too backward, the planned economic system was too rigid, and the level of national economic development was too backward. In other words, we blame the backwardness of productivity and production relations on the problem of large population!
picture
The family planning policy of "one couple, one child" has brought many drawbacks, not to mention the social problems caused by extra births.
1、 It restricts one marriage and encourages two and three marriages. A married couple has one child, and a man with marriage history and one child can have another child if he marries another unmarried woman. I have met a man who married four times and had four children! This also makes people feel more or less puzzled about the specific formulation of the family planning policy.
2、 The implementation of family planning policies in rural areas is a kaleidoscope. Family planning policy“ Times are different, men and women are the same ”, twisted into“ It's really not good. Both men and women are the same ”。 If there is only one daughter in the rural family, you can't go to the man's house. Once you leave, there will be only two old people left. So newspapers and dramas promote "married men go to women's homes", and it is a new trend of the times to cut in backwards.
But this new trend has not been playing for a long time, and the problem of rural labor force can not be solved at all. Women can not replace male labor force by their physiological nature! Therefore, the family planning policy in rural areas and fishing villages has been relaxed and adjusted from one child to two children. However, this rural two child policy has brought some drawbacks.
An expert wrote that the policy of one child in urban areas and two children in rural areas will objectively reduce the urban population and increase the rural population. More importantly, the urban population has a high level of cultural knowledge, while the rural population has a relatively low level of cultural knowledge. In this way, the policy of "urban one rural two" will reduce the population with knowledge and culture in the country, and the population with low knowledge and culture will increase relatively, which will lower the knowledge and cultural level of the whole country and nation!
3、 The families that lost their independence became the "disaster of extinction". A couple with a child, frankly speaking, is really thin, which does more harm than good. One is that the children of this generation are lonely and have no brothers or sisters. The second is that once an accident happens and a child is lost, the family will be "doomed" to lose its independence. This was true of a teacher in our junior high school.
The teacher is a class teacher, who is very excellent. He takes the junior high school graduation class, leaves early and returns late to accompany the students in the class, and neglects to take care of the family. In the afternoon of that summer, an unfortunate news came that her only 10 year old only son followed her neighbors to the river to play and drowned. Everyone was shocked and sighed
I think of the word "micro dust". In fact, each of us, each family, relative to the country, is a tiny minister.
Special statement: The above content (including pictures or videos, if any) is uploaded and released by users of "Netease" on our media platform, and this platform only provides information storage services.
Notice: The content above (including the pictures and videos if any) is uploaded and posted by a user of NetEase Hao, which is a social media platform and only provides information storage services.
