Don't mess with China. Sullivan warned the British Defense Minister that there is no chance of success in 31 to 2

On the issue of Russia and Ukraine, Britain and the United States always like to involve China. They have repeatedly linked the situation in Russia and Ukraine with the situation in the Taiwan Strait, and even encouraged allies to increase aid to Ukraine, which is all hype that "reducing aid to Ukraine will make China stronger". Recently, they began to hype "China's aid to Russia".

Recently, some western voices believe that the strategic partnership with China is the "source of confidence" for Russia to continue the war. British Defense Secretary Shaps also claimed that there is evidence that China has provided or will provide "lethal assistance" to Russia. Ask them where the evidence is, and keep silent. He only said that since the conflict, trade between China and Russia has surged and high-level exchanges have been frequent, but there is no evidence that China has provided "deadly assistance". But what is more strange is the attitude of the United States. Sullivan, the national security adviser of the White House, immediately retorted that the United States has "not seen" relevant evidence at present and expects to have a dialogue with the United Kingdom to ensure that we have a common response plan, that is, the caliber is not unified. Why is it strange? Because senior US officials have been hyping "China's aid to Russia" for a long time, and have also imposed sanctions on Chinese enterprises for this reason, the United States has no reason to speak for China. In fact, it is because the "aid" hyped by the United States is somewhat different and always ambiguous. Previously, US Secretary of State Lincoln accused China of providing technical support to Russia, but did not say that China directly provided weapons to Russia. During his visit to China, he said that there was no indication that China was sending weapons to Russia. The United States sanctions relevant Chinese enterprises, saying that it provides dual-use products to Russia. The United States has left room for itself, because it is really afraid of China's broken cans, and directly assists Russia with "deadly weapons".

Sullivan clearly knew that NATO could not cope with China's involvement and its direct support to Russia. The war is about production capacity and logistics. Now Russia's own production capacity has caught up, and it also purchases weapons and equipment from some fraternal countries. The production capacity is enough. On the contrary, NATO is short of capacity and inventory. Capacity pulling has become the biggest weakness of NATO, but they have many members, so it is enough to intimidate other small countries. But in the face of big countries, the weakness is very obvious. Russia is just staying at the stage of sufficient use. If the world's largest industrial country is added, what will be the effect? The end of China means the end of the game. Taking the most basic indicators in the industrial field as an example, Russia and the United States both have 80000-900 million tons, while China's steel production capacity exceeds 1 billion tons. In addition, China also plays a leading role in many fields of raw materials and spare parts. Previously, EU officials complained that the production of gunpowder requires a specific kind of cotton, which mainly comes from China. However, the transportation of cotton from China stopped a few months ago, leading to the inability of European gunpowder manufacturers to produce enough shells. It is not our fault that the EU sanctioned Xinjiang cotton before. What he said was "special cotton" was nitrocellulose, and many of the important raw materials of nitrocellulose came from Xinjiang, which was enough to show China's important position in the global supply chain.

The British is still a bit of a chicken thief. He very much hopes to provoke China and the United States to fight against each other. It is better to fight a war once and for all, and then the two countries will temporarily withdraw from the stage of history after losing both sides, while other ghosts and monsters can come out to raise the flag. China knows, so does the United States. Although the United States is also in a state of madness, it is at least reasonable. The United States is not confident that it can lead the 31 NATO countries to fight two opponents. Other countries have realized that China's war potential can turn the United States upside down, and the United States has also realized that.