History tells you that Khamenei is the most capable person to kill the President of Iran, and also the most profitable person

In history, such events are innumerable, and this kind of trick was used by Mongolians thousands of years ago. For example, Zha Muhe killed his younger brother to get rid of Tie Muzhen. Therefore, it seems to many people that Tie Muzhen killed him, so the revenge must be recorded on Tie Muzhen. But the fact is that Zamuhe is the beneficiary of this matter. On the one hand, he can stimulate his own tribal hatred, on the other hand, he can eliminate the existence of threats to his own power, and on the other hand, he can increase his own authority invisibly. Now let's analyze the person who is most likely to kill the President of Iran and the future direction of Iran.

The first is what people think of as a beautiful country. As we all know, Iran is a religious country, and the leader has more power than the president. So what good is killing him for yourself? Moreover, Khamenei's character is extreme, and the president's relatively mild personality can serve as a fetter. What good is it for him to kill him and let Iran stand still? If they want to kill, they will also kill Khamenei, because this is the most in their own interests. In addition, he is also driving his own helicopter, which is impossible for a normal person.

Let's take another example: two people conflict. Do you want your opponent to be a rational person or an extreme outlaw? In this way, you can understand that there is an essential difference between any decision of a country and an individual. Individuals are more emotional starting points, while national decision-making is one, that is, interests. For beautiful countries, rational Iran is not difficult to control, while extreme Iran is the most terrible. Therefore, a person with normal thinking will exclude the beautiful country. Let's think about it from the perspective: if you are a beautiful country, who do you want to eliminate most?

The second is Khamenei, for the simple reason that his interests are the greatest. In terms of competitors, he lost a strong competitor. In terms of power, he can use hatred to expand his power crazily. This is almost a copy of Zamuhe. Who do you think will pose a threat to him in Iran from now on? Then the next step is the lifelong system of power, even like the North Korean dynasty. But we have a question: will Iranian people believe such a crude strategy?

And the answer is also yes: yes, because these people can be fooled by religion, at least it proves that they are the product of ignorance and extreme. In recent decades, both the Taliban and Hamas have held high the banner of anti US, but which one has attacked the bases and embassies of the United States? At best, hijacking planes to hit buildings, and more often, using their children as human bombs to bomb their own people to create panic. Because they are bad, but they are not stupid. Only in the name of fighting against the beautiful country can they be as rich as A Deng and have many wives and concubines.

Finally, for Iran's future, I have two words: hell. Any religion has two characteristics: deceit and oppression. Some people say that men have privileges in such an atmosphere. For example, if a man is accused of cheating, a woman will be punished by criminal law. Even this is not allowed, and that is not allowed. I'm not right. These men are just aristocrats. Ordinary men are even victims of religious products. Their hierarchical system is better than that of India, which is the reason why there are few top talents in the Islamic world.

Israel, which had a shorter history than their founding, was highly skilled in science and technology, especially the agricultural drip irrigation technology, which was the world's first. Some people say it is because they are poor. Is Dubai poor? The rich Dubai is not developing science and technology, but two extremes. People at the upper level indulge in luxury and pleasure, while people at the lower level live in hardship. If I say Dubai is more terrible than North Myanmar, do you know? Do you agree? I think probably not, because this is not the information they want to teach you, so Iran is really worrying in the future.

Why don't we think about why the Islamic world loses more than it wins in the Middle East war? Without international intervention, there would be only one Israel in the Middle East. Because these religious countries are good at consuming and oppressing their own people, they never want to develop. For example, if a technology can make them fast and strong, and the premise is to change their system, Israel will definitely accept it. Those in the religious world would rather let their people be beaten because of backwardness than give up their religion. On the surface, they are defending religion, but in fact, they are not their own rights?