Professor Jia Hepeng from the School of Communication of Suzhou University published an article on the public account of Intellectuals today, responding to the public's doubts about the American moon landing.
Professor Jia Hepeng relentlessly refuted some big V's provocative behavior in the name of "enlightenment".
Professor Jia Hepeng believes that "doubting the US moon landing is not an enlightenment movement; doubting the US moon landing will bring losses to Chinese society! The mainstream scientific community needs to stand up and face the music. Because if we cannot adhere to science on the issue of" people and animals are harmless ", it will be more difficult to make judgments based on science on major issues involving interests and emotions, It is obvious that if we cannot follow the scientific logic to deal with major issues, the harm to national development will be obvious. "
The picture is from the public account Intellectual
I think so. If they allow anti intellectuals to occupy the high ground of public opinion for a long time, they will increasingly despise the spirit of science and even ignore some common sense opinions.
Professor Jia Hepeng's appeal was timely.
In fact, the mainstream scientific community has already had many responses to the American manned moon landing event, but the anti intellectual groups have selectively turned a blind eye to it. They just can't see it.
As Sima Nan discredited Lenovo's "loss of state-owned assets", Lenovo gave a detailed response very early, and declared that "state-owned assets have not been lost, and the central government has not raised any objection in previous inspections". However, the collet powder still chose to ignore it and questioned the problem of too many pensions of Liu Chuanzhi.
In fact, mainstream scientists did not fail to respond. They responded, but they still doubted.
Yan Jun, academician Ouyang Ziyuan, the chief scientist of China's lunar exploration project, and the head of the National Astronomical Observatory, is a big expert, but he has further aroused their enthusiasm for questioning. The more experts question, what credibility does the expert have this year? Experts are experts!
The Chinese Association for Science and Technology (CAST) has issued an article to refute the rumor, and said that Wang Junyi is a popular science worker for children. Seeing the word "children", it is not professional enough. How can a popular science worker for children represent the opinions of CAST!
I can't help but complain here. With the quality of these anti intellectual netizens, I'm afraid that even children's science popularization is out of the question! Did you graduate from junior high school? Think about it for yourself.
Only when NASA of the United States admitted on television that it was beaten by Chinese netizens and confessed that their so-called manned moon landing was actually taking pictures with mobile phone brackets, did netizens give up.
Even the serious official media, Jiefang Daily, came down to enlighten.
Jiefang Daily wrote that "the students of Yongle Grand Ceremony should not cheat themselves", criticizing the anti intellectual nature of anti intellectual netizens, which can be described as a complete failure!
However, these anti intellectual and skeptical netizens, even the official Jiefang Daily, have to question.
They not only used the word "small editor" to belittle the author of this magnificent article in Jiefang Daily, but also said that it was a loss of the tone and bearing of the official media. They only trusted unknown aerospace workers.
He also questioned that Jiefang Daily is a newspaper in Shanghai?
What's wrong with Shanghai?
Isn't it wrong that Chinese space workers are so ignorant that they are afraid of NASA of the United States that they don't suspect the manned lunar landing of the United States? Their obscurity just shows that there is nothing to doubt! In the words of Professor Jia Hepeng, "it shows that such doubts are seriously unreliable".
The picture is from the public account Intellectual
In fact, where they are questioning, they are just trying to beat each other up. This kind of ethos was brought down by Sima Nan and others.
The characteristic is that you are a capitalist, you are "the loss of state-owned assets", and you are catering to the West to vilify Chinese people. Ok, if you dare not respond, everyone continues to scold! what? How dare you respond? Is this your response? Doesn't it just expose your ugly essence? Do you have any evidence to prove your innocence? Let's take a look at how much you have received from your retirement pension. Is your mobile phone Apple or Huawei. As a social science researcher, it's good to say that you can prove that the manned moon landing in the United States is true. Do you know science, who your butt is facing, the sinister nature of the United States, and the weather weapons of the United States, you liberal arts student!
To not allow them to question is to make them admit that they are anti intellectual? Let them hit themselves in the face.
But if anti wise people know that they are anti wise, they are not anti wise people, so they must continue to question and implement the spirit of questioning to the end!
This is Sima Nan's basic plan.
Special statement: The above content (including pictures or videos, if any) is uploaded and released by users of "Netease" on our media platform, and this platform only provides information storage services.
Notice: The content above (including the pictures and videos if any) is uploaded and posted by a user of NetEase Hao, which is a social media platform and only provides information storage services.
