Recently, there has been a huge controversy. Personally, I feel that it seems illogical!

There is a huge controversy recently. I personally feel that the logic is not very smooth, which is a bit unreasonable.

Let me tell you something unimportant first. I hope you don't take your seats according to your number!

word When talking about our ancestors, we had two neighbors. When we were powerful, one of them actively learned and imitated us.

But when we were in decline, these two neighbors attacked us, and they also killed us.

one Our neighbors burned, killed and looted us, causing us great harm. In the end, we defeated the neighbor, but the relationship has always been normal, sometimes good and sometimes bad.

another Another neighbor also burned, killed and looted us, and robbed many of our houses, which have not been returned yet.

According to the truth, we now have two choices:

First, the past is gone. People should still face the future, and the past is gone;

Second, we must remember and never forget the past events, and we must redouble our efforts to repay the damage they have caused us.

But now Because of the practical interests of some people, they began to treat the two neighbors differently.

bright It really requires that we can only hate one neighbor, and some people even love the other who once burned, killed and looted us ➕ Neighbors who rob houses.

Personally I don't think it's good! It doesn't make much sense!

Isn't it said that forgetting history is betrayal? Isn't it a good idea to remember history? Didn't it say that good can also face the future? Why should we treat them differently? Why should we treat them with double standards?

Finally, I want to say that even for the sake of practical interests and current development, it seems that this kind of differential treatment is not quite right! Unless their interests are different from theirs, their interests are more important.