Blinken came out and spoke with a very tough attitude. The United States played a clear card to contain China

Blinken came out and spoke with a very tough attitude. The United States played a clear card to contain China! On May 22, according to the VOA report, when questioned by members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee of the United States Congress, Secretary of State Lincoln said that two fundamental changes had taken place in our approach to China, which enabled us to contact it from a position of strength. First, in the United States, we should invest in ourselves under the leadership of Congress, especially in infrastructure, chips, science bills and inflation reduction bills.
In each way, we ensure that we are in a leading position in the future industry. I have seen people around the world notice these investments and hope to cooperate with us. Secondly, our major partners in Europe, Asia and other regions have reached unprecedented agreement on China policy. Now you can see that we have the same attitude towards China, and we use the tools alone and together.
Whether it is an investment screening tool or the control of foreign investment, ensure that it will not help the Chinese industry to harm us. Export control is being implemented in a more coordinated way, and we are making comprehensive efforts to deal with China's economic "non market" behaviors, which not only unfairly "punish" our workers and companies, but also workers and companies around the world.
Obviously, from Blinken's speech, the United States has made clear the way to contain China. Blinken told China by name that the United States is going to contain China through two means. One is that the United States will invest in its own enterprises to ensure that the United States will always remain the number one in industrial competition, and will never allow China to surpass the United States in future industries. Second, the United States will work with its allies to curb the development of China's high-tech industry through export controls, investment restrictions and other means.

In Blinken's view, China's way of economic development "harmed" the United States, and the United States is completely justified in taking action. It is obvious that Blinken said it was reasonable to suppress and contain China's development. However, we want to say that since the United States can invest in its own industries under the leadership of the United States Congress, why can't we invest in its own industries? Isn't it typical that only state officials are allowed to set fire and people are not allowed to light lamps?
Moreover, the restrictions and blockades imposed by the United States in the field of science and technology are totally against the trade rules of WTO. The United States takes the lead in formulating rules. The United States says that if it does not comply, it will not comply. What is the legitimacy of its actions. The competitive advantage of Chinese enterprises is the result of free market competition, not at the cost of hurting American enterprises and workers. We will never accept that the United States is changing its ways to suppress China. Obviously, we will not yield to the American suppression.