Why do we prefer to issue long-term national debt rather than the whole people?

Yes, I have been wondering this question for the past two days. Why do we prefer to issue ultra long term treasury bonds with a 30-year maturity, but we just don't want to issue money to the whole people once?

I know that today is the day for the official issuance of ultra long term treasury bonds.

However, a netizen immediately raised such a question.

Some netizens raised such questions.

Of course, compared with such opinion expressions and questions, my bigger question is, why can't all people pay? After all, Macao has paid ten thousand yuan per person.

And they sent it last year.

The media said they had been publishing for 17 years.

A port also sent it last year, 5000 per person

Taiwan also made money last year, 6000 per person

Britain is more arrogant, with 14 thousand yuan per person per month.

Australia is also making money.

This is the details of their payment in Australia.

Canada is also preparing to start sending money.

It can be seen that many countries have chosen the way of paying for the whole people. Even Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, which belong to our Chinese cultural circle, have paid for the whole people. But we just don't choose this way, even if there is no chance to pilot.

I still remember that in the 1980s and 1990s, whenever there was any reform measure, it would be piloted in one or several places first, and then spread to the whole country. Then why can't we choose a county or a prefecture level city to carry out a pilot project for three to five years on the issue of making money for the whole people?

I want to know what the reason is, and what the reason is not to carry out such a pilot? The public wants to know about this.

No matter what the reason is, it is not good to try to make money, instead of trying and not trying, we categorically deny the possibility. Other countries have ready-made experience, so why can't we try using the principle of taking money? Are you so reluctant to transfer part of the welfare to ordinary people?

Moreover, whether it is long-term or short-term national debt, their essence is the same. They all move future money and spend it now. But has it ever occurred to you that you can use the future money now? What can you do then?

I still remember that in the past, when promoting housing loans, the reason was to spend tomorrow's money and enjoy today's highlights. As a result, 20 years later, we saw the consequences, that is, many families fell into the situation of supply interruption, the economic pressure is increasing, and personal life is difficult to have happiness, and they worry about housing loans every day.

Personally, it is the same as it is in a society. In this regard, I have always advocated that we should spend as much as we have. It is better to live within our means. We should not live beyond our means, let alone spend all the money of future generations to solve the current problems.

Then it's really not enough to sell my son's land, and I think about future generations' money again. This is my basic view on national debt, and also my feelings today. Let me share with you.