Analytic and continental philosophies might be seen as programmes , in the sense that they are sets of related activities with long-term goals. But in counter-distinction to that view, philosophy also has the broader goal of sorting out virtues, vices, and pursuing wisdom, which is less of a technical aspiration, and more of a psychological and practical one. In metaphilosophical sense , the definition of philosophy surely can be 'a practice to achieve wisdom (SEP) ' which itself is an active area of philosophical inquiry. From the SEP's ideas about wisdom:
In particular, it will focus on five general approaches to understanding what it takes to be wise: (1) wisdom as epistemic humility, (2) wisdom as epistemic accuracy, (3) wisdom as knowledge, (4) a hybrid theory of wisdom, and (5) wisdom as rationality.
In fact, there is a science of wisdom of sorts since clearly, there is a component to being drawn to "ancient wisdom" in this regard that is a vibrant component of modern psychology which is called humanist or positive psychology . So, science, philosophy, and wisdom intersect in this sort of discipline. The University of Chicago, for instance, has the Center for Practical Wisdom where psychologists and philosophers attempt to put the facts that positive psychology claims to use in people's daily lives. They claim on their about page:
The mission of the Center is to deepen our scientific understanding of wisdom and its role in the decisions and choices that affect everyday life. We want to understand how an individual develops wisdom and the circumstances and situations in which people are most likely to make wise decisions. We hope that, by deepening our scientific understanding of wisdom, we will also begin to understand how to gain, reinforce, and apply wisdom and, in turn, become wiser as a society.
You ask:
Is the wisdom of time a scientifically proven fact or just human prejudices?
In response to this, wisdom is not just an arbitrary collection of beliefs, but is grounded in the teleological nature of human preferences. There are, after all, certain psychological and cultural universals that anthropologists have identified in contrast to claims that societies are arbitrary collections of whims and preferences. Of course, it should be noted that this philosophical view might be contested by certain sociological schools of thinking that also oppose ideas like Wilson's sociobiology . Pinker, in his Blank Slate terms these academic schools the SSSM or Standard Social Science Model which has also been criticized .
However, whether one accepts or rejects and in with what vigor the notions of tabula rasa and cultural relativism , philosophy and science indubitably shape many people's view of wisdom, particularly if one's approach to philosophy is a naturalized epistemology .