4I9tOs5WSOT Author: Liu Kuangyu opinion.huanqiu.com article Liu Kuangyu: The "Gloria Report" is a wanton distortion of Resolution 2758 /e3pmub6h5/e3pr9baf6 <article><section data type="rtext"><p>The US side has repeatedly and deliberately distorted the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 recently, and there is a clear and complete linkage chain between government, university and media. One of the key links is the report "Why the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 Cannot Establish Beijing's" One China "Principle" (hereinafter referred to as the "Greyi Report"), led by the US scholar on China related issues and the head of the German Marshall Foundation's "Indo Pacific" project</ p> <p>The focus of the "Gloria report" is to deny that the resolution reflects the one China principle, and falsely claim that the resolution "does not mention Taiwan and the 'Republic of China', does not make clear that Taiwan is a part of China, and does not put forward a definite position on Taiwan's status"; Second, it falsely accused China of "misinterpreting Resolution 2758" to restrict Taiwan's "international participation"< Em data scene="strong">The report tries to avoid the historical and legal fact that Taiwan is a part of China with the concept of specious, especially speaking about the one China principle, but dare not mention the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, which makes people question whether "relevant scholars have basic knowledge." </em></p><p; At the same time, it also points out that the "specious platitudes" in the report actually originate from the old theory of "Taiwan independence" elements and their "imperial literati"</ p> <adv-loader __attr__inner="7004636" __attr__style="width: auto; position: relative;float: left;border: 1px solid #ebebeb; padding: 20px;overflow: hidden;margin: 10px 30px 40px 0; "></adv-loader> <p>This old and broken script is still confusing and misleading. It deliberately ignores the historical background, splits the space-time context, distorts major and complex historical, legal and political issues with an isolated, static and one-sided view, and induces some people to fall into the metaphysical fallacy of seeking the sword and fish from the wood</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">First of all, we should clarify how Resolution 2758 solved the "Taiwan status issue".</em>Scholars familiar with modern international relations know that the core of Resolution 2758 is to confirm the one China principle within the United Nations system and eliminate the "cross-strait sovereignty dispute" after the founding of New China And resolve the issue of the status of all China, including Taiwan, in the United Nations</ p> <p>The resolution, in the form of a mandatory "decision", requires United Nations agencies and Member States to confirm their political recognition of the new Chinese government and expel representatives of the Chiang Kai shek Group. In the historical background at that time, "Chiang Kai shek's representative" refers to the Taiwan authorities. Taiwan, as a region of China, is completely covered by China's international legal identity and does not enjoy political or legal status alone, so it does not need to be mentioned directly. Just as the United Nations refers to the United States, there is no need to mention Hawaii alone</ p> <p>Resolution 2758 has solved the issue of representation of the whole China politically, legally and procedurally in a clean and thorough way, and the issue of Taiwan's representation has also been solved accordingly. Therefore, we should not confuse the public and say that the resolution "only addresses the representation of the People's Republic of China, not Taiwan". In fact, even if he was expelled, Chiang Kai shek clearly rejected the proposal of the United States and Japan to "join the United States in the name of Taiwan" and maintain one China. When Ma Ying jeou was in power, he also said that "it is not true that the resolution does not involve Taiwan". Up to now, relevant laws and regulations on both sides of the Taiwan Straits have clearly stated in black and white that "the mainland and Taiwan belong to the same China". Even some green scholars have confessed the truth that "China's international recognition of Taiwan advocates for decades after the resolution has had substantial effect"</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">Secondly, Resolution 2758 is part of the post-war international order and power pattern.</em>Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi pointed out that after the victory of the anti fascist war, the international community worked together to create the United Nations as the core and the Charter of the United Nations The international order and international system based on the purposes and principles, China actively participated in this historical process, and the "One China" principle also formed a part of the international order after World War II. This important historical background is the key to the problem that the "Gladys Report" dare not face up to</ p> <p>A correct view of the international order is the key to our complete and accurate understanding of the connotation of resolution 2758. Resolution 2758 states that "the restoration of the legitimate rights of the People's Republic of China is essential to the maintenance of the Charter of the United Nations and the undertakings that the United Nations organization must undertake in accordance with the Charter." It clarifies that its legal basis is the Charter of the United Nations, and its core principles are "sovereign equality of States", "non-interference in internal affairs" and other basic principles as the cornerstone of the Charter. This not only shows respect for the integrity of China's sovereignty, places cross-strait relations under the category of China's sovereignty and internal affairs, clearly reflects the spirit of the One China principle, but also makes it clear that China's sovereignty is a necessary condition for maintaining the post-war order - China is a victor who pays a huge price, and denying one China means a deliberate subversion of the peaceful order. This was a historical fact that was clear to all voters in the current session of the General Assembly</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">Again, Resolution 2758 does not exist in isolation, but is a part of the international legal system of one principle.</em>Previously, from the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration to the Japanese Subduing Instrument A series of international law documents, such as, have clearly stipulated that Taiwan, the territory of China stolen by Japan, should be returned to China. These documents with international legal effect constitute a part of the post-war international order, and also legally confirm that Taiwan is an inalienable territory of China. In addition to the political fact that the new China was founded to replace the old China, the political and legal issues such as "Taiwan's sovereign status" and the succession of the Chinese government have been solved one by one. The return of Taiwan's sovereignty to the new China, represented by the Government of the People's Republic of China, is the major premise of Resolution 2758, not the "omission", nor the "inconclusive"</ p> <p>Since 1971, Resolution 2758 has served as a link between the preceding and the following, guided the specialized agencies of the United Nations to make corresponding decisions in accordance with the principle of the First Middle School, led Member States, including the United States, to establish diplomatic relations with China on this political basis, and continued to issue legal opinions and policy guidance, repeatedly emphasizing and implementing the "Taiwan is a province of China", which constitutes the "four beams and eight pillars" of the principle of the International First Middle School, With long-term, extensive and profound legal practice, we will continue to consolidate the resolution's recognition of the One China Principle and the consensus of the international community. Therefore, it is an obvious fact and logical fallacy to say that "the resolution does not involve Taiwan", or that the resolution "does not equal the one China principle" and "does not represent the position of the United Nations". Ge Laiyi's ignorance and wanton distortion of the above legal principles and historical facts will inevitably lead to the doubt of "lack of academic common sense". Considering that the report was completed under the instruction and financial support of the DPP authorities, the cause and effect of the report is self-evident</ p> <p>The "Goliath Report" is not only to let the sediment of "Taiwan's status has not been determined" rise, but also to carry out academic packaging of perverse theories and heresies. This is obviously not the work of scholars with conscience. However, the US side stirred up the waters, broke the cards, and entered the deep-water area of the principle of "Collision with the First Middle School", which also shows that its moves to contain China are limited, and under strategic anxiety and political tension, it can only use strange, insidious and senseless moves. Scholars in the island also questioned that "the resolution 2758 of the United States New Interpretation is not sufficiently confident to defeat the international reality". (The author is an associate researcher of the Taiwan Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)</p></section></article> one trillion and seven hundred and eighteen billion fifty-six million two hundred and ninety thousand nine hundred and ninety-one Copyrighted works of Globegroup are strictly prohibited from being reproduced or mirrored without written authorization. Violators will be investigated for legal responsibility. Editor in charge: Xiao Shan Global Times one trillion and seven hundred and eighteen billion sixty-one million seven hundred and fifty-eight thousand four hundred and twelve one one []