Of course, the order of restricting high consumption is useful. It can effectively limit the consumption of the dishonest people and affect their lives, so as to urge them to enforce their debts.
 From the legal point of view, limiting high consumption is an indirect enforcement measure. Indirect enforcement measures are to make the person subjected to enforcement feel pain by restricting part of his personal freedom, so as to achieve the purpose of active performance.
 [Legal Basis]
 Article 3 of the Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Restricting the High Consumption and Related Consumption of the Enforced, if the Enforced is a natural person, after the measures of restricting consumption are taken, the following high consumption and consumption behaviors that are not necessary for life and work are not allowed:
 （1） When taking transportation, choose the plane, train soft berth, ship second-class or above;
 （2） High consumption in hotels, hotels, nightclubs, golf courses and other places above star level;
 （3） Purchase of real estate or new, expanded or high-grade decorated houses;
 （4） Rent high-end office buildings, hotels, apartments and other places for office work;
 （5） Purchase of vehicles not necessary for operation;
 （6） Tourism and vacation;
 （7） Children attend high fee private schools;
 （8） Pay high premiums to buy insurance and wealth management products;
 （9） Take all the seats of the G-head EMU train, the first class or above seats of other EMU trains and other consumer behaviors that are not necessary for life and work.