What is the difference between a hearing and a court session in civil proceedings? The difference between hearing and hearing in civil litigation is as follows: 1. The concepts of the two are different. In civil litigation, hearing refers to the procedure of hearing the statement, defense and cross examination of the administrative counterpart before the people's court makes the relevant legal decision; Hearing refers to the process in which a people's court tries a case in a court or a court set up in other appropriate places after completing the preparatory work before the trial. 2. The nature of the two is different. The court hearing procedure is generally in the case execution stage. Because there is an execution objection or an outsider objection to the execution case, the court execution department will notify all parties to participate in the hearing. Therefore, most of the hearings are administrative procedures, while the hearing is a judicial procedure. 3. The functional division of the two is different. Hearing generally solves the procedural problems of execution, while the opening of the trial procedure involves the right of action or substantive rights, which is the trial and decision-making of the whole case. 4. The roles of the two are different. Hearing must prepare for the trial work, or play its regulating function to mediate the settlement of the case, so as to reduce the burden of the trial. In some civil trials, mediation is an indispensable advance procedure. Therefore, the hearing is to prepare for the opening of the court session, through which the need for trial can be determined, and the trial is a formal trial procedure. Do you understand that?
