（1） The case was filed on the basis of property damage compensation dispute, and then it was considered that the defendant's behavior of digging up the plaintiff's ancestral grave and moving the coffin nearby on the ground that the plaintiff's ancestral grave was pressing its ancestral grave was contrary to social justice, which had infringed on the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests, and the defendant's behavior had caused serious spiritual damage to the plaintiff, Therefore, the plaintiff shall be compensated for the losses and spiritual consolation money required for repairing the ancestral graves.
 （2） The case was filed on the basis of property damage compensation dispute, and then it was considered that civil activities should respect the principles of social morality, public order and good customs, and the defendant's behavior violated the principles of social morality, public order and good customs. The plaintiff should bear the corresponding consequences, so the plaintiff's ancestral grave should be restored to its original state, but the evidence for claiming compensation for spiritual solace is insufficient, so it is not supported.
 （3） Put the case on file on the basis of property damage compensation dispute, and then consider that the defendant's behavior has brought spiritual and economic losses to the plaintiff and should be compensated according to law. Therefore, it was decided that the defendant should make a public apology in writing to the plaintiff, and compensate for the burial fee and emotional damages.