Comments on Canon 7D Mark II

All kinds of good, continuous shooting, focusing, focusing, image quality, high sense, better than 7D too much, also better than 70, 80, mainly reflected in the control of color noise, 3200 random use, 6400 thumbnail is also completely acceptable. Body texture, various interfaces, recording monitoring, 3.0 transmission, wifi card support, built-in professional functions, including focusing, delay, full HD photography.

On the contrary, it is not the whole picture, but the lens matching. I have a D750 for the whole picture, but now I use it least. The attendance rate is not comparable to that of 7D2 at all, and there is also the problem of endurance, which is not as powerful as that of 7D.

I have bought both 7D and 70D. The former has high sense garbage, real garbage and low sense image quality, but the 70D body is unacceptable. After 7D2 appeared, I went to a friend's physical store to try it. I really like it, especially the high feeling. Maybe its high feeling can't match that of 5D4, 6D or D810, Compared with 7D and 70D, the d750 has a great improvement, which is reflected in the processing of dark parts, suppression of color noise, refinement of graininess, etc. The 3200 is very reassuring to use. Even if there is a little graininess, it can support the texture of the picture. The D500 has been considered, but the first price is still relatively empty. The 7D2 only needs about 7500, but the D500 is close to 11000, After all, the 7D2 was officially sold for 15 years, more than a year earlier, so it may be appropriate to wait for the D500 to 9000. Moreover, there is almost no difference in the performance between the two. However, the D500 front panel uses high-strength plastic, which is uncomfortable even if it is high-strength. The wifi version I bought is very convenient for transmission. After use, whether it is fixed focus or ultra long focus, the 7D2 is incoherent in capturing, following and focusing. The price of less than 8000 also reflects Canon's sincerity for flagship products and understanding of the market. Canon knows that APSC is too expensive and can only become inventory, such as 7D. After several price cuts, the price basically bottoms out, It is very cost-effective to start with. For the current professional level machines, either 7D2 or 1DX2. The summary is that the price performance of APSC is the first!

After a long hesitation between 80d and 7d2, 7d2 was finally chosen. It is mainly based on the comprehensive consideration of focusing, continuous shooting, grip feel and body protection. After several days of use, I felt that everything was pretty good! The summary is as follows:

Yesterday afternoon I went out to take 50 or 60 photos. The control of the shutter was better than when I just took the machine. The number of times of pressing down suddenly was greatly reduced.
I only took dozens of photos, but I don't know much about it. I only have a little trivial feeling, and I just want to compare the used fuselage.
1: Photometry and white balance are accurate and reliable. On that foggy day yesterday afternoon, it was cloudy and rainy, and the air was not thorough. The machine could restore the light and shadow environment at that time relatively faithfully, which was not bad!
2: Highlight color is preferred. It is practical after opening, and can retain most of the highlight levels. It also makes up for Canon's so-called lack of dynamic feeling.
3: The shutter sound is light, crisp, with little time lag, and the movement of the reflector falling back is also small, which is greater than 5d2.
4: Raw original picture is gray with little color and contrast, leaving more room for maneuver in the later stage. I use the standard style. When I open the dpp, it directly displays the non sharpening filter: intensity 3, fineness 7, critical value 1. In normal use, I don't need to worry about the original image not being sharp. This is better than the original image of 5d2. When 5d2 opens the original image, the critical value often reaches 6-7.
5: The electronic level is very practical, so you don't have to worry about the horizon. This function should be vigorously promoted.
6: As for the most important focus, because it is still shooting, I don't feel much about it. I chose to focus on the area and watched a dozen or so focal points run across the screen. I was overwhelmed by the 5d2 focal point to the injured fragile mind and was immediately satisfied! ha-ha!
7: The control of the fuselage is very good. I can hold it with my fingers for one meter and eight meters, leaving a little room; The eyepiece is bright and clear, which reminds me of a text in primary school, "Our classroom is spacious and bright". It's really good when combined with the feeling of shooting; There is also 100% shooting, no longer worried about the entry of redundant materials after imaging.
8: The USB 3.0 interface is convenient for importing photos. In addition, you can customize the folder name.
9: In addition, there are some creative functions, such as multiple exposure, timing shooting, etc.

The power consumption is a little high. The high sense can be improved. There is no touch screen.

Canon narrow picture with the highest cost performance ratio!

Advantages: EOS 7D Mark II focuses on high pixel and high-speed capture. Qualitative progress has been made in focusing performance and image quality
1. The machine body is made of all aluminum magnesium alloy, which ensures the use strength, and also has waterproof and dustproof properties.
2. The powerful 65 point focusing system adopts the configuration of full cross plus central double cross, which greatly improves the focusing accuracy
3 The camera is equipped with the latest 2020 megapixel CMOS and the sixth generation graphics processor to make the picture more detailed and the low sensitivity performance far exceeds 7D.
4 The body adopts a dual memory card design, which is more convenient for users to use and also ensures data security.
5 The dual pixel focusing system is used for shooting, which can effectively track the main body and make the picture smoother.
6 The continuous shooting performance of up to 10 shots per second can easily capture any wonderful moment.
7. Add delay shooting function to improve shooting fun.

shortcoming
1 High sensitivity performance still has room for further improvement, and noise above ISO6400 is obvious.
2 The WIFI function is canceled in the machine, which makes it slightly inconvenient to transfer pictures.
3 The tolerance is still average, so it is better to use RAW format as far as possible.
4 In RAW format, the number of high-speed continuous shots is slightly weak.

Bird catching weapon

Perfect multi exposure, fast focusing and fast capture. The most important thing is to use the machine well within three months.

C frame is cost-effective. I think this machine is pretty good

If you want to play the P file, please select the portal machine. If you want to focus on the scenery, please select the full picture, play creativity, and play in-depth technology. This one is the first choice.

Advantages Photographers all said that they had a lot to do, but they ignored one of the most practical, effective and safe settings, that is, the manual gear is on the m gear. When is is on the automatic gear, the exposure compensation can be reset manually, while the 5d3 can't adjust the exposure compensation on the m gear, so the m gear of 7d2 is easier to use than that of 5d3, and the 5d3 is easier to expose on the m gear

It has been used for nearly one year without any defect

7d2 is easy to use on the whole. One word: Quickly use 5d3 with Canon 16-35mmf4 is plus Canon 70-200mmf2.8 is to shoot landscape portraits and flowers. 7d2 is mainly suitable for horse 150-600mm s sports version telephoto lens to shoot animals and birds in the forest.

The picture quality has really improved. At least it exceeds 60D, and it is estimated that it can beat 7D by a large margin. Even the high feeling 6400 dare to use it. Noise is also the kind of gray spots. The current price has improved the cost performance ratio.

Workmanship feels backward. First, the flashing light on the top of the machine shakes when it is turned off, and the gaps on both sides are different in size. In addition, the shutter is soft and the two-stage mode is not obvious (the same is true for 6D). The power consumption is nearly double that of 60D.

After more than two months of use, the performance of the 7D2 has improved, but it has also brought some frustration. It is really love and hate.

The operation of the fuselage is the same as that of the 5D3, and the focusing ability is the best I have ever used. (The 5D4 and 1D2 have not been photographed for the time being...). In fact, the picture quality is pretty good. It must be enough to use with Canon's red circle head! If you say you have to count your hair, you can't do it. And the high feeling experience is also good. Basically, 2000 can be used. I can accept the endurance for the time being. The fuselage cache is also very good. I use the Toshiba 95M high-speed card. The jpeg can take unlimited consecutive shots. The number of shots for raw is about 20.

Disadvantages? After all, there are still some problems with the residual and accessory cameras. But now it is the top flagship of the toothpaste factory, and it is still willing to cut materials, which is better than other residual and accessory cameras. I am not satisfied that although Canon uses the WiFi module together to solve the wireless problem, the wired transmission can not be used after use????? What a ghost! In addition, in order to pursue the three proofing fuselage, it is hard not to flip the screen....

It is suitable for semi professionals like campus propaganda department, or as a standby machine. There is no problem in shooting birds. The family travel has excessive travel performance, and the body is also very heavy. It is not as suitable as 80D.

1. High speed continuous shooting. At present, 10 shots/s is second only to 1D. 2. Well done, the key setting is professional, and the body is made of solid leather. 3. The advent of the era of multi focus, 65 points (multi focus is helpful for macro, composition, and sense of hierarchy, whether full or incomplete) 4. The cost performance ratio is moderate (excellent?).

The benevolent see benevolence, the wise see wisdom. For me, it is not a civilian "fake 1D", but just a reporter machine. Believe me, if you are a curacao, please don't choose it. If you are recording life style for your family, please do not select it. The entry machine is appropriate. If you are new to SLR, please don't touch it. Some of its habitual parameters may mislead your growth. If you have a fever but can't afford it, don't choose it. 70D is the antidote.

Please look at things calmly. Personally, I think the essentials of camera selection are as follows: 1. Introduction: Jia, Ni and Suo all can be used. I am against the fallacy of one step! How can the digital world be achieved in one step? We must understand that the SLR must not be touched. To touch it, we must encounter the essence of the SLR. The essence is not equipment, not brand, nor blindly follow the trend! The essence is shooting technology, shooting composition, and shooting emotion... Learn about photography through photography, and tap its own aesthetic and artistic characteristics through photography. This is the charm core of SLR! 2. Upgrade: First of all, don't be too obsessed with the whole thing. It's just a size and a picture frame. There are two basic considerations for upgrading the fuselage. One is to think about what you are more interested in shooting? The second is to see whether your own lens group can continue to be effectively used in the upgraded fuselage to avoid the "chicken rib effect"... The 7D2 is just a press machine, or it is more suitable for capturing and recording facts in a large amount of work. If you want to make photography taste better, 5D3, or even 70D can be used (6D is somewhat moderate, you can do anything, but nothing can be done). Comments are not about morale. They don't mean that the 7D2 is bad. If you have already bought the 7D2, you can use it. It is a good machine. There is no best, only better.

1. The speed/price ratio is the biggest advantage of the 7D2. At present, there is no model that can compare with the 10pcs/s. The 15-85 head set with a price of 13600 yuan is really affordable for many people.
2. Whether the purchase is worth it or not depends on the quality of the picture. Compared with 6D and 5D3, my trial is better than 6D, basically the same as 5D3. It's really thick and detailed.
3. The high feeling is amazing. When Canon widely publicized the arrival of the high feeling era, it did launch real high feeling products accordingly. The high feeling is acceptable, the quality is not reduced, and no obvious noise can be seen. This has a significant help for fast speed. Without high feeling support and speed advantages, the 7D2 has no due value. The high sense of 7D2 has exceeded 6D. If it is RAW format, it can even exceed 5D3. It is particularly prominent in the comparison of live shooting.
4. Focusing mode and focusing speed are all covered by the most advanced technology, far more than 5D3. 16 focusing modes constitute the choice of shooting in multiple environments, which greatly adapt to shooting in different environments.
5. Roughly speaking, the handling is similar to that of the 7D. In fact, the hand feel, delicacy and regulation are much better than those of the 7D.

It's a pity to gather too many advantages on the half frame machine. What's the purpose? It always seems so out of proportion. The battery consumption is a little high.

Shoot as you like. This is the high shutter speed brought by high feeling and the high speed of 10 consecutive shots per second. This machine is a pleasure when you press the shutter.

I didn't see the real machine, so everything is personal. Please forgive me. 61 point focus=5D3, 10 consecutive shots are close to 1DX, high sensitivity 25600=5D3, all data is perfect. Although it is half, it also makes me look forward to it.

But!! You have noticed that one word is not: video is limited!!

I was immediately depressed. Because many micro films are shot by SLR now, the camera can't make them appear in the countryside. I have been playing SLR for four years. I have been playing K5, 7D and 6D all the way. I think video is very useful. If there is no video function, I will not buy a 7D2.

I don't think the price is as high as the online price of 12000. How can I sell a full 6D picture? The price is 8000-9500 yuan.

All metal body, comfortable to handle, common with 5D3 battery, 10 high-speed shots per second, 65 automatic focus.

Compared with the full frame camera, the high sense is insufficient and the picture quality is insufficient.

Very good standby machine, bird hunting machine, worth having.

At 63 o'clock, people who focus quickly but don't like to shoot birds are not very interested in it. People who think there is a gap cannot feel it. Video shooting is very powerful in SLR. If you buy a DV for video shooting, it will be more powerful. There is also a so-called dual DIGIC 6 processor. The continuous shooting speed of 10 pieces/s is not very popular.

The color and sharpness (details) are not suitable for taking pictures of landscapes. Many people like portraits, but I think it is because the skin is worn, and the color is red. The reality is not strong, and I like it personally. The low light ISO1082 represents that the high sense is not good. The dynamic range is a major disadvantage of Canon, which is pitiful. The larger the dynamic range, the richer the level of expression, and the wider the color space. The larger the dynamic range of the camera, the richer the dark and bright details it can record at the same time, which is also the reason why it is not suitable for shooting landscapes and its sharpness (details) is not too strong. Unfortunately, the portraits of Nikon tend to be yellow faced with white hair, which makes many people choose the features of Canon as unreal portraits. It is true that there is no end of the machine, no one is perfect, and finally it depends on the individual.

It is good to make a full profit. Those who are not short of money and love to shoot birds, plus those who love to take pictures of younger girls, can consider that they seldom take pictures of scenery. If there are too many rational people in this world, the confused people will not be enough. (Personal opinion)

Absolutely a good machine, ready to start, for people in need, the advantages are there, and there have been many online evaluations.

No,

First of all, I don't have the 7D2 machine. I am an old 7D user, because I haven't bought a cannon yet. I am going to equip the 150-600mm Sports with the 7D2. Don't talk about the picture. The person who bought this machine is not for the picture and the price. It is ignorant to say such words. The people who buy this machine already have a complete set. I already have 5D3 and 6D, so there is no need to buy another 5D3 and 6D. I believe that most people who buy 7D2 already have 1DX. Many people spray 7D2. I want to say why don't you spray Porsche? Why is it more expensive than Chang'an van? Is it because you are mentally handicapped that you buy Porsche? The expensive thing is about performance, not price. Only people with financial difficulties talk about price, and those who talk about price will not look at 7D2, ignoring the existence of this thing directly.

1. The focusing system is fully upgraded. 2. The processor is fully upgraded. 3. Pixel slightly increased. 4. The continuous shooting speed is enhanced.

1. Very expensive, quite expensive, super expensive. 2. The aps-c picture has no development prospect. 3. The performance direction is too single and the availability is not high.

The price and positioning of this camera are too high, which can not meet the expectations. It is called high-end machine, and it is a mid end upgraded version. In the face of high-end demand groups, whether news or sports, they are not poor people, and they will not choose it. For players, it is appropriate to set the price at 6000 yuan for a single player.

Magnesium alloy body, new processor and focusing system, faster continuous shooting, supporting 1080P video shooting.

The battery life is not good enough, the price is high at present. In addition, the emergence of 7D2 makes people puzzled about Canon's product line. Compared with the entry-level full frame SLR 6D. This APS 7D2 is better than 6D in other aspects except for its smaller size. The cost of full frame sensor is not much different from that of APS frame, and should not exceed 1000 yuan. As a user, if you add 1000 yuan, you can turn the 7D2 into a full picture. It is estimated that many people will be happy. As a full frame SLR with a single unit price of about 10000 yuan, the 6D has good imaging quality, but its materials and configuration are too stingy. If the 7D2 is changed to full frame, and the battery life is strengthened, it can be called 6D2. Canon also needs to upgrade its 6D.

As a high-end model of APS frame, Canon 7D2 can be said to be the best APS frame SLR at present. It is estimated that Pentax K3 may also be able to compete with it. However, as an APS SLR, the price is equivalent to the price of the entry-level full frame SLR. At present, the price of about 10000 yuan is somewhat high, and the cost performance ratio is not high. We are looking forward to the full frame SLR equivalent to the 7D2 configuration, so as to replace the imperfect 6D.

All kinds of good

No discovery at present

There will be three stripes in the dark picture of the recorded video. If the light is good or the sensitivity is improved, it will not be obvious

Basic configuration of 1DX: double DIGIC 5+, 61 focus points, strong focus function; Have the same sensitivity of 5D2; 10.2fps continuous shooting speed, very suitable for motion photography.

The sensor size adopts C frame, which is also considered by Canon and Canon in the price gear, otherwise it will be the same as 1DX.

The performance is close to 1DX, which is worthy of owning.

The advantages are very simple. When the 7D is proved to be garbage, an updated 7D2 is launched to continue to fool!

Canon launched the 7D2. No need to argue. It must be a machine with virtual high pixels as the virtual head, and the high sense definitely disappointed everyone. Focus at 61? 10 consecutive shots? It's meaningless to focus at 61 o'clock for scenery films. What's the use of 10 consecutive films without high feeling support? Which photographer likes to watch low quality films? The pony four has been out for several years, and now it has killed 7D2 in seconds, so Canon Series 1 will never let other models of machines surpass it! Don't worry, the high feeling of 7D2 and 7D will not have much improvement, otherwise who will buy 1DX? The 7D series is still chicken ribs after ten generations!

The weakness of Canon 7d is that its high perception is too poor. Don't think about pursuing high image quality. How can it always be sunny when the weather is unpredictable? Good conditions? Therefore, it is expected that the 7D2 high feeling will be greatly improved. If the high feeling is not satisfactory, it will still be a chicken! three point two

Without saying anything, the 65 o'clock full cross focus can kill most flagship models in seconds. The ability of dual pixel AF is also reflected in 70D, which is really good. Focusing alone, Nikon D810, D4S, Canon 5D3 and 1DX are all defeated. With the continuous shooting speed of 10 pictures/s, they must be powerful tools for shooting birds, sports photography and news photography. Dual DIGIC 6 processors also guarantee the image quality, and ISO 51200 is enough.

Some people say that 7D2 should be a full picture. But I want to say that if it is really a full picture model, Canon will sell a P for other full picture models. The 7D2 configuration is really powerful. But after all, too few people really need these functions. From the perspective of cost performance, 7D2 will not be selected for household use, especially for those seeking full picture quality. Canon's positioning of the 7D2 is not for the public to buy, but for the minority. As for the shortcomings, there are a lot of them, and there are also many unsatisfactory ones. But looking at all Canon products, none of them is really perfect. After all, each product has a different orientation. In addition, the price is a problem. The online price is 1799 dollars. If this price is true, it will be a big rip off... It can only be said that we can see some development of Canon's follow-up products from 7D2, and we expect that 1DX2, 5D4, 6D2, 80D and 800D (750D) will be launched as soon as possible, or they will be really crushed by mud puddles.

The overall configuration of the 7D2 is very good, so the APS-C frame is used for positioning. However, powerful focusing and continuous shooting can really make up for these shortcomings. In some special shooting fields, it can definitely be regarded as the king, and someone will follow.

The continuous shooting of 10 pictures per second and the full cross focusing at 65 points are very useful for capturing, and the anti shake function of the body is also very useful. It should be considered that the anti shake lens should not be used in the future. The feel and control of the body are also very satisfactory.

The battery charges a little, so I had to buy a backup battery.

I used 650D before. I felt that capturing was a bit difficult before I planned to upgrade it. They all said that the 7D2 was a sports machine for reporters. I thought that home use was also very good. Before I bought it, I also compared it. The 5D3 was good, but it was a bit expensive. The 6D was too old, the focus was too poor, and the 7D2 was relatively new. The main reason was that it focused more on the focus and captured well. The imaging effect is also satisfactory.