Canon 700D

As always, it inherits the advantages of Canon machine. Because it was launched late, it can be comparable to the 60D except for some standard configurations. It is small and convenient to carry, and all configurations are very suitable for this price and positioning. As a card replacement machine, home computers and even small authoring machines are enough. Auto focus can be used with the new generation 18-55 video recording. It has been used for one year without any crash, paint loss or accident. Others can be found in the evaluation and the advantages written by others.

The matched 18-55 has obvious dark corners on the 18 end, and the dark corners on the 24 end disappear, which is not a problem with the light shield. Also, I wonder if my computer is the only one with this problem. When I install the flash lights such as Yongnuo, Nissin and Miz, no matter whether it is Canon interface or not, the flash lights crash and cannot flash synchronously. Now I use the high-speed flash mode of Jiebao's TR-981C to flash normally, which makes me very confused, but there is no problem with the original Canon flash. In addition, no shortcomings were found. Disadvantages are not equal to weaknesses. Those who say that 700D has a high perception of poor performance, which is not as good as that, and those who lack it, please think that it is impossible to obtain those configurations without spending so much money on 5D3 and 6D. Compared with previous generations of products, it has made great progress. I have used 500D and 600D for a period of time.

I am an amateur photographer. I have used Canon's 500D, 600D, 60D, 7D, 6D, 5D, Nikon's D7000, 7100 and D800. My own machine is 700D hanging 18-55, 55-250 and small spittoon standard civilian equipment. 700D has been used for a year and brought me a lot of feelings. This is a good machine, and the hardware is secondary. Learning composition and using 700D light can make good films. The attached camera looks like a year later. There is also a sample of the civilian head+700D mentioned above. You are welcome to comment.

1. I originally used the 7D, but later I replaced the D7000 and 70D, both of which are midrange computers. The operation is sure to be good, but they can't support the weight. Traveling is just a convenience. But I still like the SLR after using it for so long, otherwise it will be simple. As for the full picture, only those with fever and perseverance will choose it. Otherwise, for simply recording life and improving photography technology, 700D and D5300 are enough! 2. I must complain about the improvement, but here I really want to praise the coating of the fuselage. I have bought many Canon and Nikon machines. To be honest, the coating of Nikon machines is very comfortable. I like the graininess. In fact, Canon lenses have the same feel, but EOS has used this coating for a long time. As for the introduction of EOS, it is just a layer of paint, The hand experience has given Nikon seconds. But! The 700D particle coating is really comfortable. It is very rough and feels like 5D and 7D, and even has a little strengthening. As for 60D and 70D, the coating is still the same, low-end feel, like plastic toys! 3. Many practical and creative functions, such as the enhancement of filters. For example, the improvement of real-time viewfinder focus is the most practical for ordinary users. 4. I don't agree with this touch screen. Personally, I think the SLR should look like an SLR, but after a period of use, it is really easy to use! This may have something to do with our daily use of tablets and mobile phones. I personally think that even if 7D2 and 5D4 are added to the touch screen, many people will like it. 5. I have to admit that some people will say Canon is

The shortcomings are all based on a certain basis. If there is no 650D in front of it, there is no shortage of squeezing toothpaste in 700D. Right! 1. Toothpaste squeezing. For the previous work, the 700D upgrade is too small. Even for the 1800W pixel CMOS, although phase focusing is added, you can at least improve the noise control, even if it is half gear. Maybe 1800 pixels is the limit. 2. Functionality. Compared with the D5300700D of the same level, it lacks this WIFI. This is actually very useful. Without remote control, it can be used as a mobile phone. It can also be used for wireless printing and transmission. It is really good. It is estimated that it will appear in 750D. 3. The problems that can't be solved at the entry level can only be solved by buying batteries or adding handles. 4. The handle of the wheel and the button is average. I compared it with the 7D, which is shameless. But the wheel is plastic, not rubber, and the texture of the button is not as soft and comfortable as the 7D. Both the 7D and the D7000 are very proud of this! In addition, the 70D button is just like that. It has a strong sense of plastic and a very short key path. Anyway, it is the same as the 700D button. 5. It is not a disadvantage of entry, but it should also be mentioned that the maximum shutter is only 1/4000. Although it is said that even the full picture of entry is like this, it is still a little scornful of manufacturers. However, for users, it is rare to use the 8000 shutter. Maybe the creators will.

The overall rating is only 4.5 points. In general, the 700D is a relatively complete entry-level SLR. Even as a standby, it is also an excellent standby. The overall quality of the 700D may be a little lower than that of the D5300, but in general, I think the 700D is better. It seems a bit unscientific for me to use the APS-C high-end computer to use the mid-range computer and then use it to use the entry-level computer. However, the fact has proved that traveling should be light. It is more practical to save more money and buy more good lenses to focus. Of course, you should think with your head when taking photos. Don't just pursue equipment. As long as the equipment is your favorite and you know more about your SLR, you will certainly make progress.