Nikon D3400 (single machine)

The new generation processor, without low-pass, has excellent picture quality. Although it uses 2400W pixels, it is still exquisite even when viewed at 100% magnification, with good high sense, high tolerance of the picture. The AF-P18-55 lens has a fast focusing speed, and the design of the lens lock is very considerate. The lens and the body are very small, so when used outside, they will not be as bulky as the traditional SLR. The small body can also reduce the aggressiveness of the model

Just got it, it is as small as a toy. Like many low-end cameras, it has a plastic body, no shoulder screen, and a single wheel. Although the new generation 18-55 uses a thoughtful lens lock design, it is a bit cumbersome for those who do not need it in this regard, and it saves the AF-MF switching and shake proof switching on the lens, which is very inconvenient. The batteries cannot reach the official 1200, It is estimated that the maximum number is about 800, but this is still a good endurance result, with 11 focus points slightly less

I am not a Nikon Party, nor a Canon Party. I just share my experience objectively. Although the D3400 is a low-end entry-level SLR, its image quality is excellent. It has been using Canon's 6D and 100D before. The D3400 image quality has been greatly improved compared with 100D, and the color is more natural than 6D. The so-called yellow color has not been found, and the image quality is still fine at 100% magnification. This has brought a lot of space to the later stage, which is also unexpected. The fuselage is small, but the endurance is greatly improved. Previously, the average endurance of 100D was about 300 photos, but after the D3400, the endurance almost doubled. Although Canon 100D is the smallest single reflex fuselage, the 18-55STM is not small, so on the whole, the D3400 is smaller. Like Canon 6D, there are only 11 focus points, but what is better than the 6D is that the D3400 has a more uniform focus point distribution, and its focus speed is completely incomparable with that of high-end computers, but it meets most daily applications. Although the D3400's operating experience is not as good as that of D5xxx and D7xxx series, it has an incomparable price performance ratio, and its image quality is almost the same as that of the latter, but it is more economical. Finally: SLR is not a point and shoot machine. You must read your camera manual carefully to understand your camera. Don't be too obsessed with equipment. A good camera can increase the shooting experience, but this is not the standard for taking good photos. Think the focusing speed is not fast enough? Don't worry, the camera used by Master Bresson in those days can't capture as fast as you!

It is light to fit with the lens, good battery life, cheap price, good performance, easy to operate, the lens is equipped with a stepping motor, and focusing is fast

I'm too lazy to talk about the obvious shortcomings of others. The budget is not much, which is not a disadvantage. Although it is cheap, the workmanship is not very good. I used two 3400s, and the film opened when the first shutter 4000 was used

After playing photography for several years, I finally chose 3400 from Canon 40D to Nikon D7000, and some 53003300 and other machines were used between them. I first looked at the parameters and comments from Zhongguancun when selecting machines and lenses. Thank you for having such a website. Today I want to write a comment carefully to give a reference to friends who are still choosing. The advantages and disadvantages have been briefly stated, If the money is not too much, it is recommended to choose this machine as the first choice, because the price is cheap, but the performance is not inferior to other entry-level machines. When the technology is good and the money is rich, it can be directly used in the full set, equipped with some high-end lenses. Before this, do not waste money to upgrade the 71007200 and other mid-range machines. There is no need to upgrade them. They are just slightly improved controls, focusing, etc, It's really unnecessary for the practical party, but if you like to toss and turn, it's another matter. I'm not very satisfied with buying this machine and taking a few pictures. Don't be disappointed. First, find the technical reasons. Then I said that it's just a good entry level, too demanding and unrealistic. If you have some spare money, you can buy several cost-effective lenses, such as 35 1.8G, 50 1.8G, The telephoto has 55 300VR or 70 300VR, and the price is not expensive. The auxiliary factory also has a lot of good lenses, so let's not talk about them one by one. In short, I like this machine very much, and I will continue to spend some time to send out some bad films. I went to Guilin to shoot a few days ago, and felt that the evaluation of pictures was higher. Ha ha, let's enjoy the fun of photography.

Lightweight and portable, excellent picture quality, good endurance, high sense 3200 available, 6400 barely. The 18-55 of AF-P is really good. The focus is strong and the quality is sufficient, especially in sunny days. At the moment when the outsole is portable, the balance between control and portability is good.

Some functions should not be castrated, for example, the focus is too little; No automatic FP, but it seems that the 3 and 5 series do not have it.