Xiaomi 14 Ultra (12GB/256GB)

1. In terms of configuration, it can be said that the 14U is a more versatile bucket configuration, with all the necessary ones, and the configuration parameters can also be played in the same level. 2. In terms of appearance, Xiaomi has also found its way to the Ultra series models, focusing on a family design heritage. As far as the 14 Ultra is concerned, the appearance is OK, quite grand, and the rear circular Deco is also relatively durable and highly recognizable. The most important thing is that the hump back design of the previous generation 13U is removed, and the back is completely flat. Although this also causes the rear module to bulge more obviously, the actual appearance is more durable than that of the previous generation. In fact, the hands-on experience is fairly good, without the awkward feeling of the previous generation. 3. In terms of photographing, there is little difference from the previous generation, except that the main camera is updated to LYT-900, which is the regular upgrade of IMX989. The other three cameras have upgraded the aperture size, which is not much stronger than the actual perception of 13U, mainly due to the subtle differences in tone and tone.

Although HyperOS is much better than MIUI and animation, its stability needs to be improved. Small frame drop still exists in daily use, but it is also much better than the version above 14/14 Pro. The system optimization is not perfect, and there is still much room for optimization in terms of stability and fluency. In addition, the endurance also needs to be improved. The current version of the system consumes power relatively quickly, and there is still much room for further optimization. Satellite communication is relatively weak. This function publicity stunt is more effective than actual use, and it also increases the cost of mobile phones.

Appearance and feel: nothing about the appearance really grows on my heart bar, and the overall feel is also good. The performance configuration is also full. It is more comfortable to hold than mate60pro.

Photo effect: I bought this mobile phone to take photos. Before I bought it, my main machine was mate60pro+the spare machine was Nubia Z50S PRO. I bought the spare machine in exchange (I was very satisfied with the high price of the replacement machine, and the activity cost me more than 1000 less). Not because he didn't take good photos, but because he was sorry for his hardware. I have just mentioned the main machine I use. Compared with that main machine, this one is really better at taking pictures in some extreme cases. However, the ability of daily casual shooting is slightly poor: one is that the algorithm is not enough, the other is that the intellectualization cannot recognize the scene well, and the recent focus distance of macro is insufficient. The result is that the ability of shooting at random is not better than my main machine. But if you are professional enough, you can really take good photos. But why don't I take SLR when I am so professional? The following picture is the comparison picture of the two cameras. The upper and lower pictures are taken by 14U. The other one I don't understand is that Z50S pro does not block or suspend frames when playing Primitives. This actually causes frame dropping optimization. Also, the video package is always disconnected and needs to be optimized!

I miss the Nokia 1020

cost performance