Civil Engineering Online Forum \ Registration examination \ Registered Structural Engineer \ Let me talk about PKPM Yu Yingjian

Let me talk about PKPM Yu Yingjian


For the moment, let's talk about Hong Kong occupying the middle.
The resolution of 8.31 completely angered the Hong Kong Students' Federation. The 30-year democratic process was about to end. They felt that the central government would still appoint the chief executive in the future, and the general election of 5 million Hong Kong people was getting farther and farther away. This is no good. I have to go to the street, eat pepper spray and tear gas, sleep on the street 24 hours a day, and the port police have also shown tolerance and restraint. No matter what the result, I praise both sides.
PKPM of the Academy of Architectural Sciences has always been in a monopoly position in the domestic structure industry. The design institute has bought everything, and its service attitude is certainly like a big brother. In recent two years, Yingjianke suddenly emerged and became famous overnight. I don't know why YJK is really out of date. I don't know why Yingjianke is also out of date. Leaders are the ones who won't use it.
Yingjianke is similar to PKPM. I think that the biggest difference between the two software is the interface. In short, there is little difference in core functions, because Yingjianke is developed by PKPM people from the Academy of Building Sciences.
Why don't those people directly improve PKPM and create a Yingjian Branch! The two software also went to the design institute to hold a promotion meeting all day, and each software always and must belittle the other software when introducing its own advantages. Are these people stupid?
In my humble opinion, this is the so-called strategy. No matter how they pinch each other, look at the results: all design institutes used to use only one PKPM and pay a share; Now all design institutes use two similar software, one is PKPM, the other is YJK, and they pay two dollars.
They are the people of the Academy of Sciences, and now they have made two profits.
This strategy is win-win. The design institute is very happy to pay for the two pieces of money and watch them pinch each other. It's like watching the excitement. The people of the Academy of Architectural Sciences, no matter how they pinched each other, must be happy in private. After all, they took two shares from the Design Institute.
As for us, we are also very happy. After all, we can make a choice. After all, making a choice is also a kind of democracy.


  •  People are on the journey
    I hope the third kind of software will come out
    2015-03-27 22:59:27

    reply report
    agree with one
  •  boff1989
    boff1989 Bench

    It's a pity that today, ten years later, I saw what the landlord said. Hong Kong is now occupied. The owner of the building is now somewhere high. Finally, I want to ask if I am Xiaobai, Yingjianke or PKPM?

    2024-04-10 15:35:10

    reply report
    agree with zero
Load more

Registered Structural Engineer

Back to section

1051500 items · 2141 subscribers

Guess you like it

Read the next article

Registered structure professional consultation

What books do you read in the first level of the registered structure professional examination? Is there an online tutoring class? Whose tutorial class is better

Successful reply

Experience value+ ten