Excuse me, does Xiaomi 3 have a telecom version
Comprehensively understand Xiaomi 3 (Mi3/Mobile 3G)
Recommended high-quality applications
It seems that the choice is not the CPU, but the mobile number.
Tegra 4 Quad Core 1.8GHz and Snapdragon 800 are relatively better than Tegra 4 in terms of power consumption and efficiency
Your Vida is better at playing games. Qualcomm usually uses them better,
Qualcomm's Cpu should be better. In fact, it depends on the number you use Unicom or Mobile
At the same level of performance.
I think the NVIDIA Tegra 4 quad core 1.8GHz is much better. It should be clear to all game players. Although the Qualcomm 800 is also good, it is better than the computing speed, game rendering, chip layout, power saving and the company's powerful NVIDIA Tegra 4,
It's the power of Nvidia.. The battery is always a hard injury to smart phones
NVIDIA's Tegra 4 processor will beat Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800 processor in computing speed. In view of the fact that Tegra 4 processors are not actually on the market at present, the conclusion of this report is based partly on the Tegra 4 display speed that was unveiled at the MWC conference at the beginning of the year, and partly on the fact that Snapdragon 800 will use the Krait 400 architecture, which will increase by 10% on the basis of Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, compared with the data of 1.7GHz to 2.3GHz. Based on all the above data, this report concludes that Tegra 4 defeated Qualcomm Snapdragon 800. It seems that the basis for this comparison is not particularly reliable, and there is no real data comparison, so we need more clear evidence to prove that the two chips that are not really listed are stronger and weaker. Based on pure digital comparison, it seems that Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800 is stronger than Tegra 4. In the test results of Quadrant v2 benchmark software, Although the 16436 score of Tegra 4 is much higher than the 12417 score of the previous generation of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, it seems that the real gap between the two is not obvious when the Snapdragon 800 upgraded the main frequency from 1.7GHz to 2.3GHz and scored 16799 without any optimization of its Krait 400 architecture. Although it seems that Tegra 4 and Snapdragon 800 are evenly matched on the surface, and the executives of the two companies are also constantly "fighting", both sides seem to have their own tendencies: Tegra 4 chips are designed for faster computing speed, and natural energy consumption is not low; The Snapdragon 800 seems to pursue a perfect balance between performance and energy consumption. Therefore, it seems that Tegra 4 is really faster than Snapdragon 800 only from the perspective of computing speed performance test.
The performance of Qualcomm Xiaolong 800 is better.
NVIDIA Tegra 4 is a cortex a15 architecture. Snapdragon 800 is Krait architecture. From relevant data, a15 is 5.0 mips/mhz and krait is 3.3 mips/mhz. Under the same frequency and same core number, the CPU performance of the a15 architecture is 1.5 times that of krait, and the CPU performance of krait architecture is only 66% of that of the a15 architecture.
If I had to choose, I would still buy a newer NVIDIA Tegra 4. After all, it was released later than Qualcomm, and the new products are always better than the previous ones:)
Actually, it depends on my personal preference. Choose Qualcomm
It mainly depends on what card you use,
Of course, Qualcomm is good at running points. T4 is used for mobile phone It's just that the tragic performance can't be brought into full play
It depends on you mobile phone Is the card from China Mobile or China Unicom
Well, I prefer Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, which has high fever and high running score...
Personally, I think Qualcomm is good. After all, they are professional mobile phone CPU is also recognized by everyone!
The Snapdragon 800 processor is better than the T4 processor. In fact, it has advantages and disadvantages with each other, but considering the inheritance of mobile chips, use Snapdragon
Want to use Mobile 3G , then choose the mobile version. If you want to use Unicom 3G, choose the Unicom version Telecom 3G Select the telecom version
It should be the Unicom version
It's almost all the same. It may not make any difference when you use it, but you just don't want to change the number...
In fact, there are no advantages or disadvantages for the two processors. They are both the top processors in the current market with excellent response speed; What I want to say is the shape of Mi 3 this time. I also quite agree with the combination of Mi 3 shape=Lenovo K900+Nokia LUMIA920. It is really not as good as the previously released exposure effect picture. Mi 1 is a brick, Mi 2 copies the design of Meizu, and Mi 3 copies the design of others, which is really disappointing, so I will not consider Mi 3! Quad core with high pass 800 CPU mobile phone This year, we have many choices, so our choices will be very spacious. Xiaomi is a technology company that lacks design!
In terms of architecture, T4 is the latest, but in terms of actual performance, T4 is similar to Qualcomm 800. From the perspective of functional differences, Nvidia is a display chip giant, and its game and video functions have no rivals, while Qualcomm is a communication professional, and its communication functions are beyond doubt. Therefore, users should choose T4 and Qualcomm 800 according to their actual needs. The two CPUs of Xiaomi 3 just launched have been used, indicating that the overall performance of the two CPUs is equivalent! One is a model that uses T4 to move in China, and the other is a model that uses Qualcomm 800 to move in China Unicom and China Telecom.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 is better. It is recommended to buy a customized one from Unicom. If you use a mobile card, you'd better use a mobile customized one. After all, you can use its 3g network and hope to adopt it
In terms of performance, both the Tegra 4 and the Qualcomm 800 use 28nm technology. The main frequency of the Tegra 4 is between 1.8GHz and 2GHz, while the Qualcomm 800 reaches 2.3GHz. According to the comparison, the Qualcomm 800 will be more powerful than the Tegra 4, and the Adreno 330 graphics processor will improve the performance of the Qualcomm Pro by 75%.
If the score is high, Qualcomm's performance should be accurate, and the specific experience should not be much worse
Personally, I think the Dragon 800 is good
I think Qualcomm is better, mobile phone It is only for normal use. There is not a lot of calculation work, which is enough. It is said that Nvidia has more heat dissipation than Qualcomm. I don't know whether it is true or not.
NVIDIA Tegra 4 is better, saving power
It's unnecessary if you're not a high-end player. You can't tell anything. Nvidia's main advantage is its computing speed
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 is better
What mobile company number do you use.
A new report shows that NVIDIA's Tegra 4 processor will beat Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800 processor in computing speed. In view of the fact that Tegra 4 processors are not actually on the market at present, the conclusion of this report is based partly on the Tegra 4 display speed that was unveiled at the MWC conference at the beginning of the year, and partly on the fact that Snapdragon 800 will use the Krait 400 architecture, which will increase by 10% on the basis of Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, compared with the data of 1.7GHz to 2.3GHz. Based on all the above data, this report concludes that Tegra 4 defeated Qualcomm Snapdragon 800. It seems that the basis for this comparison is not particularly reliable, and there is no real data comparison, so we need more clear evidence to prove that the two chips that are not really listed are stronger and weaker. Based on pure digital comparison, it seems that Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800 is stronger than Tegra 4. In the test results of Quadrant v2 benchmark software, Although the 16436 score of Tegra 4 is much higher than the 12417 score of the previous generation of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, it seems that the real gap between the two is not obvious when the Snapdragon 800 upgraded the main frequency from 1.7GHz to 2.3GHz and scored 16799 without any optimization of its Krait 400 architecture. Although it seems that Tegra 4 and Snapdragon 800 are evenly matched on the surface, and the executives of the two companies are also constantly "fighting", both sides seem to have their own tendencies: Tegra 4 chips are designed for faster computing speed, and natural energy consumption is not low; The Snapdragon 800 seems to pursue a perfect balance between performance and energy consumption. Therefore, it seems that Tegra 4 is really faster than Snapdragon 800 only from the perspective of computing speed performance test.
Personally, I like Qualcomm's Xiaolong 800. The connection between Qualcomm chips and GPS is not ordinary!
I think NVIDIA Tegra 4 quad core 1.8GHz is better
High pass slightly better, the highest performance mobile CPU so far
There is no standard for which is good. If you use TD 3G, you can only use the Xiaomi 3 of Tegra 4
Nvidia and Qualcomm have their own characteristics
Mainly looking at mobile phone What is a card? Tegra for mobile, Qualcomm for China Unicom and China Telecom. It seems that the running grades are almost the same.
Qualcomm is much better!!
The architecture of Tegra 4 is better than that of 800
Xiao Long should be faster. TAGER4 has a high score because of its good graphic effect
Nvidia Tegra 4 processor uses 72 customized GeForce GPU raster processing units. At present, the market is basically eight display GPU, and Tegra 4 has increased by 9 times from the data point of view. It is six times more than Tegra 3. The performance of graphics and games will naturally be greatly improved. At the same time, it also supports 4K ultra-high definition video decoding, and has the so-called "PRISM 2 Display" display technology, which can ensure clear picture quality while reducing backlight power consumption. On the Gpu, T4 is much better than 800. This time, it is no better than T3. Nvidia will not make another mistake on the CPU. The score of T4 is higher than 800, so I will not comment
If I choose Qualcomm, I will definitely choose Qualcomm. After all, Qualcomm has an integrated baseband, which is more stable
