Even the method of sorting icons has little impact. Of the above three patents, the first is more important. As an old brand intelligence, Zhonghua Kulianmobile phoneManufacturers, of course, have more patents on mobile phones than later generations like Xiaomi. For example, ZTE's dual card and dual standby patents, Huawei's flight mode patents torn by Qualcomm a few days ago, are all important functions of mobile phones. Big Brother did not sue later generations,Later manufacturers naturally won't have any idea about the previous manufacturers (Li Nan's clamour to sue manufacturers for abusing mback failed a few months ago), and China is not as peaceful as foreign patents.Coolpad took the lead in breaking this situationIn fact, it is more exciting than Huawei and Samsung's overseas patent war. After all, Huawei will support the country if it loses the lawsuit.As a new manufacturer, Xiaomi has no room to talk to the old brand Coolpad. Then Xiaomi is sentenced to infringement and these patents are suspended.Who is next?The last city will be stripped of its skin, and the domestic market will be fierce again I hope the lawsuit can be withdrawn. Coolpad is really reasonable, but it's really bad for domestic manufacturers
Read the news (are these three?) This is the truth of Coolpad GG. Otherwise, it will be soldmobile phoneHow good is it to earn a subsidy through the channels of operators, and have to sue others? On the other hand, the rumor that Xiaomi will be listed in 2018 may also be true. Otherwise, how could there be such a sudden disaster? First of all, I agree with the maintenance of intellectual property rights. Knowing the world is power, ah no, knowledge is power. However, the protection of rights is not the focus of this matter. Think for yourself, has there been a patent war in China before this matter?I remember the "Nubia Meizu Small Circle Competition" in 2015, but this did not affect the making of mobile phones, and it would be too much to change the appearance.Some of these patents of Coolpad have a great impact, while others have a poor impact, such as this
It means that Coolpad's lawsuit complies with the regulations, so it was accepted. What's your opinion? You should ask me how to view Coolpad's lawsuit against Xiaomi and the six patent infringements of Xiaomi's home. I can also understand how to view it. What's the point of accepting it.
Acceptance does not mean that Xiaomi must have infringed on the rights.If I have to ask how to treat the case, my opinion is to wait for the hearing.
First, I looked at the patents of Coolpad, which are all about system interaction and UI.To put it bluntly, domestic manufacturers of these gadgets have learned from each other.Some interactions of Xiaomi have also been borrowed by Google.As for how about the official verdict, I personally think that Coolpad has little chance of winning. Those patents are too broad.
In short, inmobile phoneIn terms of communication patents, Xiaomi has obtained the authorization from Qualcomm and Nokia, so it is not worried about patent issues.As for the patents on system interaction, I think Mocha RQ has said very well.A somewhat energetic manufacturer will not play these games. For the development of domestic mobile phones, the country is bound not to allow domestic manufacturers to sue each other in court (it is a world of difference from some pollens who expect millet defendants).To put it mildly, if Kupai sued Huawei instead of Xiaomi, the public opinion would not be like this.
In any case, it is obvious from this matter that weak countries have no diplomacy.As for what justice?principle?law?Intellectual property?It's all farting.
Kupai sues Xiaomi. All the news or posts are full of Kupai scolding, and there are no excuses.
I think if Xiaomi sues Kupai, he will be scolded by Kupai.
In a word, there is almost no possibility of complete victory. It is nothing more than mutual compromise and Xiaomi's concession of profits. It does not rule out the possibility that Kupai's profits cannot be captured at all
