[Privacy is dead] Information disclosure is suspected of being swiped? (II)


09:32, May 16, 2024

The complaint service platform of the postal industry shall fill in the complaint information.

09:47, May 16, 2024

By modifying the address, we can obtain the store information of the merchants and launch complaints inside Taobao. I didn't buy anything from this store, nor did I have friends to place orders on my behalf. I clicked to contact the merchant and made an internal complaint.

At 12:31 on May 16, 2024, Yunda Express (Deyu Branch of Guangdong Dongguan Taobingying Company) called

It means to contact the merchant for processing, and pull my number into the system. In the future, I will not receive this package unless I buy something by myself.

20:43:01, May 17, 2024, the collection point has signed

The angry point is that the rejection is clear, but the proxy signature is displayed here!

At 9:10 on May 17, 2024, call Yunda Express for inquiry number and complain

(To be continued) (Forget it, don't want to update)


After sorting out the ideas, it is likely that the merchant will find the person who swipes the bill, and the person who swipes the bill uses my personal information to swipe the bill. The reason is that I have no direct or indirect contact with the merchant.

It's not appropriate for me to complain about Yunda. After all, they are only responsible for soliciting pieces. I should complain to the merchant, but I didn't go directly to the merchant to complain. Only through Taobao complaints, the platform's supervision of the store is unknown. The second is to find the talent line behind the order, and the event rate is probably not solved.

The reason for rejecting is that the task of the scalper will not be completed successfully. Yunda here told me that the merchant chose to intercept the signature on behalf of others. Damn it!

Although China's network security awareness is constantly improving, citizens' information self-protection awareness is also improving. However, as long as you are willing, one mobile phone number, one name, one QQ number, one microblog account, even one WeChat, one avatar, you can get rid of your personal information. The information on social work methods is not detailed here, especially the biggest information leakage case of the previous year - the 4.5 billion address information leakage event. I was shocked when a netizen inquired about my social work (based on an online security course assignment, I have been informed of it), and obtained personal information such as my mobile phone number through QQ and the existing information on the network. Since then, I have a new understanding of personal information.

The double-edged sword of mobile phone real name registration has begun to appear. Although this is conducive to the supervision of the platform, it also increases the risk of personal information disclosure. For example, netizens complain about the filing of online domain names. The domain names can be retrieved from the holders, and other relevant information can be queried once the names are available.

Of course, China's laws and regulations are also strengthening the supervision of personal information disclosure. Just like the case that the owner of station B's UP was opened some time ago, some criminals were minors, lacking in ideology and moral concepts, and lacking in legal awareness. After using various kinds of magic and free social work library, these people are constantly losing the bottom line and touching the bottom line of the law.

In addition, with the country's response to the call, the display of IP ownership has led to the disposal of robot spam numbers of some foreign forces, and blog friends have joined the IP display function. Some people use the accurate IP database to display and locate, and the error is small. Some people use the provincial administrative division positioning. At present, the administrative division of station B, twitter and microblog positioning is provincial. Why not further strengthen the positioning? Or is the positioning more accurate? This seems to go against the freedom of the network. Blog friends are mostly two camps. Some people have joined the IP address attribution, while others refuse to show the IP attribution (I'm probably the second one, and I'm too good to make sure). I think there is nothing wrong with both. Everyone has their own opinion, and everyone should be responsible for their own words. It is also justifiable to show IP ownership. The reason why IP attribution is not displayed is that you want to keep your own pure land, which is understandable.

Generally speaking, Privacy is dead


Reference knowledge

Natural person information social worker: https://github.com/aplyc1a/blogs/blob/master/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%94%B6%E9%9B%86/%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E4%BA%BA%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A4%BE%E5%B7%A5.md

REG007: https://www.reg007.com

Did the link you shared reveal your privacy? https://uid.ejfkdev.com/

Privacy: https://library.aiuys.com/

Digital-Privacy: https://github.com/ffffffff0x/Digital-Privacy/blob/master/README.zh-cn.md

The recognition of ostrich mentality will not make the world a better place, which is well explained by this microblog
If you want to protect your privacy like coding information in photos, the premise of protection is to recognize where there are privacy problems, and discovery is the first condition for all actions
There are always people who are more motivated and more beneficial to find and use the little known information gap, such as spear phishing
The platform side also needs to feel users' concern for privacy, and technically avoid or mitigate it in advance

——uid.ejfkdev.com

Statement:

All contents in this blog are for study and research only. Please do not use the technical means of the project for illegal purposes. Any negative impact caused by anyone has nothing to do with me

Statement: Zimu Piecemeal | All rights reserved, violators must be prosecuted | If not specified, all are original | This website adopts BY-NC-SA Authorization by agreement

Reprint: Please indicate the original link for reprint- [Privacy is dead] Information disclosure is suspected of being swiped? (II)


Clear, bright and elegant, I would like to take this as a navigation mark on the road of life!