Original title: Who is to blame for "cyber violence" in the online fight video? (Quote)

"Random shooting" can not be "casual sending" (theme)

Tonight's News (reporter Li Qian) An ordinary quarrel was filmed by the onlookers and posted on the Internet, causing a large number of netizens to discuss it. Recently, in a typical case released by the People's Court of Hexi District, the party Mr. Bai (not his real name) encountered such a bad thing.

One day, Mr. Bai was told by a friend that he was "hot" on a short video platform. It turned out that Xiao Wang (not his real name) privately released the video of Mr. Bai's quarrel with others, which triggered netizens' discussion. There were some improper remarks insulting Mr. Bai, which made Mr. Bai very angry. Mr. Bai believes that the short video platform, without knowing the true course of the dispute and its causes and consequences, has released and disseminated videos without its consent that have not been processed such as image coding, resulting in serious violations of his portrait rights, reputation rights and personal privacy, resulting in a decline in his social evaluation and disturbing the peace of private life. Mr. Bai sued Xiao Wang, the user of the account on the short video platform, to the court, asking the other party to restore its reputation, eliminate its influence, apologize and compensate for losses.

The court held that Xiao Wang's release of the video did not obtain Mr. Bai's consent, and did not deal with images, sounds, etc., which triggered netizens' comments and had a certain negative impact on Mr. Bai's social evaluation. Therefore, Xiao Wang's behavior has damaged Mr. Bai's reputation, so he should bear the corresponding tort liability and apologize to Mr. Bai. As for the property loss claimed by Mr. Bai, there is no factual basis, and the court does not support it.

The judge reminded that the short video platform, as a new media media widely used at present, has the characteristics of wide dissemination scope and fast dissemination speed. "Random shooting" should respect the privacy of others and consider their wishes. It should not affect others, nor should it be "casual" on the Internet regardless of their privacy and reputation. Once it causes infringement disputes, it should bear the corresponding legal responsibility.