Non prosecution decision

　　 Copper officials will not prosecute [ two thousand and fourteen 〕 six number

　　 The respondent Zhang ××, male, **** year ** month ** Date of birth, ID card number ****** , Han nationality, primary school culture, residence in Suining County, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province ****** , live in this village. The non indicted person Zhang ××, suspected of intentional injury two thousand and fourteen year one month six He was detained by Tongguanshan Branch of Tongling Municipal Public Security Bureau in the same year one month sixteen It was changed by Tongguanshan Branch of Tongling Public Security Bureau to obtain a guarantor pending trial.

　　 The case was investigated and concluded by Tongguanshan Branch of Tongling Public Security Bureau. The investigation authority charged that Zhang ××, the non indicted person, was suspected of intentional injury two thousand and fourteen year three month six The court was transferred to this court for examination and prosecution on the th.

　　 The Court has examined and found that:

　　 two thousand and thirteen year four month twenty-one day thirteen At that time, in the Telecom World Section of the Underground Boutique Street, Middle Changjiang Road, Tongling City, the respondent Zhang ×× opened the closed roller shutter door for convenience and was ready to transport yellow sand from twenty-four Hour pedestrian passage. Wu ×, the security team leader of Kundeyuan Property Branch of Ruian Real Estate Corporation, stopped Zhang ×× from passing through the channel for pedestrian safety. Therefore, the two sides had a dispute. In the dispute, the non prosecutor Zhang ×× injured the victim Wu × in the left eye. According to the appraisal of Tongling Public Security Judicial Expertise Center, Wu ×'s injury degree was identified as minor injury.

　　 two thousand and fourteen year one month eighteen day The relatives of Zhang ××, the non indicted person, reached a compensation agreement with the victim, and the victim understood his behavior and requested that Zhang ×× not be held criminally responsible.

　　 The above facts are confirmed by documentary evidence such as the compensation agreement, witness testimony, victim statement and expert opinion in the volume.

　　 The Court believes that Zhang ×× has committed the act specified in the first paragraph of Article 234 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, but the circumstances of the crime are minor, the parties have settled, and according to the provisions of Article 37 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, no penalty is required. In accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 173 and Article 279 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, it was decided not to prosecute Zhang ××.

　　 If the person who is not prosecuted does not accept this decision, he may appeal to this court within seven days after receiving this decision.

　　 If the victim refuses to accept this decision, he may appeal to the Tongling People's Procuratorate for public prosecution within seven days after receiving this decision; You can also file a private prosecution directly with the Tongguan Mountain People's Court of Tongling City without appealing.

　　 People's Procuratorate of Tongguanshan District, Tongling City, Anhui Province

　　 two thousand and fourteen year four month eighteen day