(1) Object Elements
This crime infringes the property rights and interests of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions. State owned companies and enterprises, with the goal of obtaining the maximum benefit of property, engage in civil activities with the property authorized by the state to operate and manage, and bear the responsibility for maintaining and increasing the value of assets to investors (i.e. the state). Although the ultimate purpose of state-owned institutions is not to make profits, they engage in civil activities and bear civil liabilities on the basis of funds allocated by the state and within the scope permitted by national laws. The staff members of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions take advantage of their positions to entrust their profitable businesses to their relatives and friends for operation, or purchase commodities from the units managed by their relatives and friends at a price significantly higher than the market price, Or sell commodities to the units operated and managed by their relatives and friends at a price significantly lower than the market price or purchase unqualified commodities from the units operated and managed by their relatives and friends, which will inevitably damage the interests of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions, thus making the preservation and appreciation of state-owned property a bubble.
(2) Objective Elements
The objective aspect of this crime is the act of taking advantage of his position to carry out business activities for his relatives and friends, illegally providing facilities, and causing serious damage to national interests. The so-called relatives and friends generally refer to relatives and friends, which should be understood in a broad sense. As long as the actor illegally provides convenience for other people's business activities, it can be deemed as illegal convenience for relatives and friends.
According to Article 166 of the Criminal Law, the ways of illegally providing convenience for relatives and friends to conduct business activities include the following three situations:
1. Give the profitable business of the unit to their relatives and friends for operation. It is usually that the actor takes advantage of his position to decide, participate in economic and trade projects, and grasp the market conditions of economic and trade information in purchase and sales exchanges, and hands over to his relatives and friends the business that he knows is profitable and should be operated for his own unit. However, if this business is not the business of his unit, even if he learned it by taking advantage of his position and handed it over to his relatives and friends for operation, it cannot constitute this crime.
2. Purchase goods from the units managed by their relatives and friends at a price that is significantly higher than the market price or sell goods to the units managed by their relatives and friends at a price that is significantly lower than the market price. In short, it is from the units managed by their relatives and friends to the higher level, thus damaging the interests of the company and enterprises.
3. Purchase unqualified goods from the units managed by their relatives and friends. It requires the doer to purchase the goods of the management unit of his relatives and friends knowing that they are unqualified goods. Knowing clearly includes both that the doer really knows it is unqualified goods and that the doer may know it is unqualified goods. If the goods are purchased without knowing that they are substandard goods, it is impossible to constitute this crime unless it can be determined that the goods are purchased from a unit managed by one's relatives and friends at a price significantly higher than the market price. It should also be pointed out that the purchase of substandard goods from the unit operated and managed by one's relatives and friends, regardless of the price and whether it is a high price purchase, has no impact on the establishment of this crime. This crime can be punished as long as its behavior has seriously damaged the national interests and caused heavy losses to the national interests.
The act of illegally providing convenience for one's relatives and friends to conduct business activities must be the use of one's own position convenience. Those who do not take advantage of their own position cannot constitute this crime. The so-called use of position convenience here mainly refers to the use of the convenient conditions for working in state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions, especially for leadership, production and business activities. They can either use their own positions to directly provide illegal convenience for their relatives and friends, or use their own power and position to control, command and threaten, or influence others to provide illegal convenience for their relatives and friends.
The behavior of the actor must cause significant losses to the national interests to constitute this crime. Although the actor has used his position to illegally facilitate the operation of his relatives and friends, if he has not caused actual losses to the national interests or has actual losses but does not belong to significant losses, he cannot be punished as this crime.
The so-called heavy loss of national interests, here, should mean that the unit has lost the possible profits due to leaving the profitable business of the unit to relatives and friends to operate, that is, the profits that the unit should have received have been transferred to their relatives and friends, and the amount is huge; As well as the huge amount of losses caused by the high price purchase or low price sales of goods from the units that operate and manage their relatives and friends, or even the purchase of unqualified goods from the units that operate and manage their relatives and friends, thus transferring the losses of relatives and friends to the units.
(3) Main elements
The subject of this crime is a special subject, that is, the staff of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions. The staff here not only refers to the national staff of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions, but also refers to all the staff of state-owned companies, enterprises and institutions.
(4) Subjective element
This crime can only be constituted subjectively by intention, and has the purpose of making illegal profits. That is, the perpetrator knows that it is a breach of trust to provide convenience for relatives and friends to conduct business activities by taking advantage of his position, but he still intentionally carries out this behavior in order to obtain illegal benefits, and his negligence does not constitute a crime.
View Details>>