put questions to 180000 lawyers answer online
A good and trustworthy lawyer Lawyer Zhou Meng is good at: contract affairs, labor disputes, legal counsel
Consulting lawyer
  • What is the difference between limited liability and unlimited liability

    1. Similarities and differences of definitions Limited liability company: shareholders have limited liability and the company is fully responsible. Unlimited liability company: shareholders bear unlimited joint liability. 2. Difference in responsibilities Limited liability company: shareholders shall bear limited liability according to the amount of capital contribution. Unlimited liability company: the shareholders shall bear unlimited joint and several liability for the company and its debts. If the company cannot repay, the shareholders shall bear the liability for repayment.

    full text
  • What is the cancellation process of decoration contract

    There are three main ways to terminate the decoration contract: both parties of the contract should clearly agree on the terms of termination when signing the contract. Once these conditions are met, the contract will automatically become invalid; When there are legal reasons for termination, either party can apply to the local people's court for termination of the contract; Finally, both parties can also reach an agreement to terminate the contract through full consultation.

    full text
  •  What does the general proxy authority include
newest Hottest
whole
 Lawyer Li Long
2024-05-29 18:26:45
It is illegal that the penalty on the training agreement exceeds the training fee. According to the relevant provisions of the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China and its implementation regulations, the amount of liquidated damages for training agreements is clearly limited. Legal provisions: Article 22 of the Labor Contract Law: If a worker violates the service period agreement, he shall pay liquidated damages to the employer as agreed. However, the amount of liquidated damages shall not exceed the training costs provided by the employer. Article 16 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Labor Contract Law: The training expenses specified in the second paragraph of Article 22 of the Labor Contract Law include the training expenses with certificates paid by the employer for professional and technical training of workers, travel expenses during the training period, and other direct expenses for the workers arising from the training. Legal interpretation: The amount of liquidated damages in the training agreement shall be limited to the training expenses actually provided by the employer. This means that if the liquidated damages exceed the actual training costs, the excess amount will not be recognized in law. In addition, if the service period has not been fulfilled, the liquidated damages required to be paid by the employer shall not exceed the training expenses that should be shared for the part of the service period that has not been fulfilled. Conclusion: It is illegal for the penalty on the training agreement to exceed the training fee. When signing the training agreement, workers should carefully read the terms to ensure that the amount of liquidated damages complies with the law. If the employer requires to pay liquidated damages that exceed the statutory limit, the worker has the right to refuse and can seek legal means to safeguard his rights and interests. The above contents are for reference only!
Question: Is it legal that the penalty on the training agreement exceeds the training fee?
 Lawyer Li Long
2024-05-29 18:26:45
It is illegal that the penalty on the training agreement exceeds the training fee. According to the relevant provisions of the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China and its implementation regulations, the amount of liquidated damages for training agreements is clearly limited. Legal provisions: Article 22 of the Labor Contract Law: If a worker violates the service period agreement, he shall pay liquidated damages to the employer as agreed. However, the amount of liquidated damages shall not exceed the training costs provided by the employer. Article 16 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Labor Contract Law: The training expenses specified in the second paragraph of Article 22 of the Labor Contract Law include the training expenses with certificates paid by the employer for professional and technical training of workers, travel expenses during the training period, and other direct expenses for the workers arising from the training. Legal interpretation: The amount of liquidated damages in the training agreement shall be limited to the training expenses actually provided by the employer. This means that if the liquidated damages exceed the actual training costs, the excess amount will not be recognized in law. In addition, if the service period has not been fulfilled, the liquidated damages required to be paid by the employer shall not exceed the training expenses that should be shared for the part of the service period that has not been fulfilled. Conclusion: It is illegal for the penalty on the training agreement to exceed the training fee. When signing the training agreement, workers should carefully read the terms to ensure that the amount of liquidated damages complies with the law. If the employer requires to pay liquidated damages that exceed the statutory limit, the worker has the right to refuse and can seek legal means to safeguard his rights and interests. The above contents are for reference only!
Question: Is it legal that the penalty on the training agreement exceeds the training fee?
  • Lawyer information improvement
    108 pieces of true lawyer information to help lawyer selection
  • Rich cases handled personally
    Lawyers handle case inquiry in person, which is safe and reliable
  • The platform service data is complete
    Data presentation of service information and clear lawyer service
home page > Legal topics > Special topic of contract affairs