This camera is more suitable for the elderly. 1. Light and portable, 480g, only half the weight of the SLR body. 2. Full picture, very good picture quality. It is better than half picture, four thirds picture and one inch picture. 3. The price is also acceptable. For 1w2, Zeiss 2.0 big aperture kick head, the scenery, portrait and macro are all good. Street photography is the best. It saves the trouble of changing the lens, and it is not easy to enter ash and water. Of course, far focus is no good.

The main disadvantage of this camera is that it has no touch screen and no reverse screen. This is what I am most dissatisfied with.

The lightweight and portable Zeiss 2.0 wide aperture Cutou with full picture frame is good for taking pictures of scenery, portraits and macro distance. Street photography is the best.

I am good at photography but not good at it. I am very interested in photography but my skills are at the end. Therefore, professional comments will not make a fool of myself. For RX1R, I paid more attention to it on the Internet before I started, but when I got it, I couldn't help but marvel at how exquisite and perfect it is. Take out the small body from the huge black package, and that heavy will give me a solid feeling. Playing everyday, the photos are just like the photos I played before. Of course, it may be because I haven't played SLR. As for the SLR, I don't know how many years I have followed it. What I don't like is the size and complexity of the camera. It is obviously not suitable for such an immoral super lazy guy like me. So before, we only played telephoto. Some people called it a piece of junk. At present, we play with the HX300, which is also Sony. Fortunately, we finally have RX1R, a pair of interesting extremes. A 35mm fixed focus, perfect picture quality, perfect high sense, perfect delicacy; The other is a 24-200mm 50 times cannon, a perfect peeping master, a perfect moon range artifact, and a perfect mirror. What's more, it's the same simple, but it can also use universal batteries. It's really great. With these two goods, a load of one kilogram can complement each other in length, and complement each other in essence. Compared with the huge full length SLR and a group of cameras, it is not clear who is playing who, hahaha! Of course, I'm a terrible lazy person. I always respect those hardworking shadow players and weight sports enthusiasts. Don't spray me!

On the principle of not affecting the picture quality, it is better to be smaller and more exquisite! If you add more than 50x optical zoom, it will be excellent! So I can throw the HX300 to the children to play. Of course, this is basically a fantasy in more than ten years, and after more than ten years, I will also be old.

Concentrated essence! Let the lazy and the rotten people also produce some decent movies. Undoubtedly, this is a kind of progress, a milestone, a classic, and at the same time, it gives unlimited hope to the future!

1. The picture quality is amazing. The JPG straight out image quality is very good when it is set in the machine, especially in weak light, the color out of focus level transition and so on are top performance. After removing the low-pass, the resolution has been greatly improved compared with RX1. 2. The tolerance is very good, which is higher than that of all the SLRs in Fake Energy. RAW can easily pull back the high light areas that appear to be overexposed or the dark areas that appear to be dead black. I always believe that tolerance is an important indicator to measure the level of modern digital cameras. 3. The high sense is excellent. The picture quality below 3200 is good. Now the ISO for shooting is all automatic, and the upper and lower limits of the automatic ISO can be set. When taking pictures, you only need to care about the aperture and shutter. 4. Small size, portable. The A7R is also a full frame micro unit, but with the lens, the volume is much larger than the RX1R, which greatly reduces the portability.

1. The focusing speed is slow. This has been compared with the A7R. Although it is all contrast focusing, the A7R lens focusing system is obviously different from the RX1R. The A7R focusing system is quiet and fast, while the RX1R focusing system is not only slow, but also has "Zizi" sound. It is estimated that the hardware system is different. 2. Unable to full screen peak. AF speed is slow, let's use manual. Who knows that as long as you want to use the peak value, you must turn on the zoom in and focus. The zoom box affects the speed very much when capturing. You have to specify only one zoom box shortcut key. When you press it, confirm the range of the zoom box. When you press it again, it is much faster than when you select the focus range when zooming in. 3. When using spot metering mode, it seems that only the central point can be measured, and there is no way to link with the free focus. 4. The battery capacity is too small, and the battery life is a problem. I have 4 batteries now. 5. Attachment price Can I say dirty words?

If you don't want to toss around the lens and pursue the picture quality, and have time to enjoy life and photography slowly, then RX1R should be an excellent choice. It is not only small and portable, but also has a full frame body and a 35/2 Carl Zeiss lens. The picture quality performance is excellent! I originally bought RX1 and took it with me wherever I went. To be honest, I was moved by its image quality. Later, before A7 was launched, I quickly threw away RX1. After A7 was launched, I received a RX1R at a very low price. The image quality was better and the price was lower.