News background:
Many fake "Jin Dong" short video accounts are still active, creating love for middle-aged and elderly women. According to media reports, Liu Peiling (not her real name), who was cheated out of 190000 yuan by the fake "Jin Dong", started falling in love with the new fake "Jin Dong" again. Although the last fake "Jin Dong" has been sentenced, it does not prevent Liu Peiling from talking with the next fake "Jin Dong" on her mobile phone day 。
Why do cheats often succeed?
Cheating fans' feelings is only the first step to fake "Jin Dong". The real purpose is to ask the woman for property through love. These new fake "Jin Dong", who is showing solicitude to aunts, is the same trick as before, even without changing the name and face, but still can capture the trust of so many aunts, including aunts who were cheated of more than 100000 yuan. Where is the logic of the success of the liar? 【 detailed 】
Some people know that it is fake "Jin Dong", but they just like this emotional value. Many people are ashamed of being cheated, which also makes case investigation and counter fraud difficult. Why is "ashamed to speak"? Most people are ashamed to reveal their emotional needs and worry that their families will "fall out" when they know they have been cheated. The aunts like this emotional value, which also reflects their lack of emotion in real life. 【 detailed 】
Why is the platform audit always unclear?
The springing up of new fake "Jin Dong", the continuous push of "Jin Dong", and the emotional deception in a big way are enough to show that the platform has not only failed to scrape bone and cure poison in the governance of the "Li Gui" account, but also helped the fake "Jin Dong" continue to find hunting targets through the algorithm recommendation mechanism.
Even ordinary netizens can see the problem at a glance for the account with star avatar, star banner and ambiguous wording. Why is the platform audit always unclear? The platform makes a lot of statements. It is better to improve the technical means and efficiency of audit, deal with suspicious accounts in a timely manner, and play the role of "gatekeeper". 【 detailed 】
The law will not tolerate fraud
By the end of 2023, China's population aged 60 and above will exceed 296 million, of which about 170 million are netizens. It requires joint efforts from all parties to guard against emotional fraud. In addition to strengthening the management of information content, it is also crucial to improve the network literacy and anti fraud awareness of the elderly and constantly purify cyberspace.
How to fill the spiritual world of middle-aged and elderly people and protect their physical and mental health and safety deserves the attention of the whole society. Only when they are loved can they be far away from the trap of emotional fraud. Children should not lose to cheats. They should pay more attention to their elders to make their lives more fulfilling and joyful. 【 detailed 】
(The above comprehensive Beijing Evening News, Guangzhou Daily, Nanfang. com)
V perspective:
@Lin Shenyao: Jin Dong lies on the gun.
@213 of Love 1 Mountain: It is true that the brain of love is regardless of age.
@Second Harding Ding: They just need care.
@Yunzhongfei: Don't trust the "star" account. Anyone who asks for money will, in nine cases out of ten, engage in fraud.
Editor's Note:
The fake "Jin Dong" only cheats money, can't give true feelings, but hit the real problem. Counterfeiting star accounts has been repeatedly prohibited, suspected of fraud, and also infringed the legitimate rights and interests of stars. It is necessary to continue multiple rounds of remediation to form a multi-party joint effort, so as to make the cyberspace more clear. With the development of AI deep learning technology, the network platform should assume more responsibilities and obligations, accurately identify the star high imitation number, and timely ban. At the same time, ladies You should also improve your discernment, and don't be seduced by the sweet words of the fake "Jin Dong".
Review: Previous reviews of "classics"
