4Hu6jiWeuv4 Author: Chen Lifei taiwan.huanqiu.com article Trying to create "Sunflower 2.0"? For ten years, the Democratic Progressive Party is still playing "old tricks" /e3pmh1fmg/e3pmh1g6o <article><section data type="rtext"><p>[Chen Lifei, a special correspondent of the Global Times] Taiwan's legislature is engaged in a vote war on the "reform bill", and several waves of conflict broke out between the government and the opposition. Outside the venue, the Green Camp used the means of the "Sunflower Student Movement" ten years ago to incite some young people and students to gather outside the legislature late at night and demand to stop voting. However, the support rate of young people in the island for the Democratic Progressive Party has declined significantly</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">Trying to create "Sunflower 2.0"</em></p><p><p>After several public opinion representatives were injured during the review of the bill on the 17th, the voting war was staged again on the 21st, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) brought out sunflowers on and off the court. According to Taiwan's United Daily It was reported on the 22nd that when Han Guoyu, the head of Taiwan's legislature, read out the agenda item on the 21st, someone suddenly threw the sunflower to the rostrum (as shown in the picture). It was originally directed at Huang Guochang, the general convener of the People's Party and Youth League, but nearly hit Han Guoyu. The KMT public representatives on the side rushed to hold up signs to help block it. There was also the DPP public opinion representative singing the song of the "Sunflower School Movement" on the evening of the 21st</ p> <p><i class="pic con"><img data alt="Picture from Taiwan Zhongshi News Network" src="//img. huanqiucdn. cn/dp/api/files/imageDir/4d02330f0e154d8555c7437b133b452cu1. png? ImageView2/2/w/1260 "/></i></p><p>There were 40 citizen groups gathered outside the legislature. They took turns from 9:00 a.m. on the 21st to midnight. They held sunflowers in their hands and shouted slogans such as" Taiwan will not be good if the Kuomintang and the People's Party fail ". Although the rain was not small that day, students still poured into the scene after nightfall, and the sponsor announced that the number of students exceeded 15000. They put forward five requirements, including "the legislative reform should not undermine the separation of powers", "protest against the confiscation of democracy in blue and white", etc. According to Taiwan's "Central News Agency", some people came to the stage and said that the legislature is basically "most of the violence oppresses Taiwanese in bad ways". The organizers also set up a screen on the spot to synchronously broadcast the legislative session. When the DPP public opinion representatives came to the stage to speak, they listened carefully, but as soon as the speaking time ended, they shouted "Let him (her) speak". Earlier, on the day when many blue and green public opinion representatives were injured on the 17th, some young students protested against the blue and white camp outside the legislature in the evening</ p> <adv-loader __attr__inner="7004636" __attr__style="width: auto; position: relative;float: left;border: 1px solid #ebebeb; padding: 20px;overflow: hidden;margin: 10px 30px 40px 0; "></adv-loader> <p>Taiwan's United News Network disclosed that as early as before the war between the government and the opposition, the Democratic Progressive Party's public opinion representative office had contacted relevant groups, hoping to put pressure on the Blue and White Party League from outside to the mainland at a critical moment, "vaguely like the 'Sunflower School Movement' ten years ago". Some media call it "Sunflower 2.0". Not only that, the DPP also asked for support from the "American father". The United Daily said on the 22nd that Green Camp representatives invited Situ Wen, the former head of the Taipei office of the American Association in Taiwan (AIT), to take the stage, accusing Lan Bai of expanding power through the legislature and seizing power from the executive branch. The newspaper mocked that Situ Wen, who was reading on his mobile phone, was deeply ironic. The Americans advocated "decentralization and balance", but assisted minority leaders in Taipei to "emasculate the legislature". The article asks that the Democratic Progressive Party has produced a third leader in Taiwan, and is going to sue the foreigners for their losses. Wouldn't it break the bull's hide that Lai Qingde preached? Looking for foreigners to help the government and the public to attack and defend, is the Lai government using foreign forces to interfere in internal affairs</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">"The intention to manipulate the power of the people"</em></p><p>Ye Yuanzhi, the KMT's public opinion representative, broke the news that on the 17th, there was a DPP's public opinion representative on the floor who had been saying that "there are already students protesting outside", and he questioned that "they are a dragon. External organizations are responsible for mobilizing students, and people inside will use it to pressure us". </p><p>Cai Zonghao, the youngest member of the Kuomintang League in Tainan Municipal Assembly, said that the conflict in Taiwan's legislature was originally an internal dispute, but the Democratic Progressive Party did not follow the rules and incited many young people to surround the legislature, hoping to repeat the "sunflower incident" of that year and use the mass movement to force the opposition parties to yield. But does it really represent justice? Lin Feifan was also one of the participants in the "Sunflower Student Movement" at that time. When he became the Deputy Secretary General of the Democratic Progressive Party in 2019, he was ridiculed as "Lin 90000" because his monthly salary was up to NT $90000. Recently, he was appointed as the "Deputy Secretary General of the National Security Council" by Lai Qingde, and his salary soared to NT $200000. Cai Zonghao said ironically, "Sunflower 1.0 has been promoted and made a fortune. Now the 2.0 interview is coming again. As long as you follow the Democratic Progressive Party, you can enjoy yourself". The participants called on the DPP to stop using the youth of Taiwan as the meat shield of its own bully, and also reminded the people of the island not to blindly escort the DPP's corrupt hegemony</ p> <p>Zhao Shaokang, the former chairman of "Zhongguang", said frankly that the current action of the Democratic Progressive Party "cannot imitate the sunflower". Ten years ago, the Democratic Progressive Party was an opposition party, which was highly incendiary. But now, the "five reform laws" are to increase the checks and balances of Taiwan's legislature over the administrative department, and the opponents are unknown. Zhao Shaokang said that everyone has seen the arrogance and arrogance of Taiwan officials in the legislature. The legislature has added the function of check and balance supervision, and the public opinion representatives of all parties should support it. Now the Democratic Progressive Party is sworn to escort administrative officials. "This anti public opinion mentality really makes people wonder why voters choose them"</ p> <p>Taiwan writer Piaolang Island said on Facebook that in the past eight years, the Democratic Progressive Party, with its advantage in the number of legislators and despite the continuous protests of social groups, has forcefully adopted issues such as opening up laizhu, "labor base law" to mend evil (referring to the dispute caused by the Cai authorities' promotion of the amendment of the "Labor Standards Law" in 2017, which led to a sharp decline in labor rights), and "forward-looking plans", which have long disappointed the public. In addition, a group of "Sunflower" leaders who "entered the DPRK as officials" ten years ago whitewashed the fault of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), stepped on the people to cling to the dignitaries and earn high salaries, making many young students "have long seen through the DPP". According to Taiwan's Tianxia magazine, the election in January this year shows that the DPP has lost a lot of young people's votes. For one thing, the bonus of "Sunflower" has already disappeared. Zhang Yumeng, president of the "Taiwan Democratic Youth Association", observed that for Taiwanese under 25 years old, "Sunflower Student Movement" is only a term in history textbooks, and may not be clear about the actual context of events. This generation of young people has been in power of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) since they became sensible. "They all look at the problems of the ruling party". Secondly, the channels for young people in the island to obtain information are also widening their distance from the Democratic Progressive Party. Many of the social platforms most commonly used by Taiwan's young ethnic groups come from the mainland, but the Green Camp abandoned these "propaganda positions" because of its political philosophy. According to United News Network, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been in power for eight years, and there have been many cases of forced entry into the legislature. Now the situation has changed in turn, and the opposition parties have fought back in an all-round way. "But it is not a long-term plan to control the power of the people, not to seek solutions, if you want to be in power and make trouble."</ p> <p><em data scene="strong">Lai Qingde's mentality of "you are the people and we are the masters"</em></p><p>"If you lose, you will win" He Yicheng, the president of the Taiwan Youth Federation, wrote an article on this topic, saying that the always overbearing green camp public opinion representatives were unwilling to abide by the rules of procedure and just wanted to take chances. So when their seats were at a disadvantage, they moved the past model of taking to the streets to fight into the legislature, thinking that they could jump in the queue and disrupt the order at will by means of violent conflict. However, there were many young people's representatives of the Kuomintang this year, and the Green Camp could not gain any advantage if they really started, so finally the blue and white people's representatives succeeded in occupying the rostrum to ensure the proceeding of the proceedings</ p> <p>The United Daily said on the 21st that the DPP had not developed any new tricks. It was still the three moves: the first move was to use violence in the debate, use the deer as a horse, and call the thief to catch the thief; The second is to incite supporters to surround the legislature; The third move is to mobilize the flanks. When the Kuomintang was in power, it suffered terribly from these moves. But today is not what it used to be, and the DPP has repeated its old tricks with limited success. The conflicts in the forum were reported by many foreign media, which made them lose face to the international community; They instigated "Sunflower 2.0" outside the forum, but only a few hundred people came on the 17th, even less than the rallying point of the Populist Party's "May 19 Grassroots Parade", which gathered more than 8000 people. Although there are several lawyers' associations, federations, or organizations known as citizen groups leading the way on the Internet, "when the list is opened, we can see old faces on the flanks, and the effect is self-evident". According to the article, Lai Qingde is holding the banner of "protecting democracy". In fact, his mentality is "you, the people and I are the masters". Democracy is only when it conforms to the views of the Democratic Progressive Party. With the power in hand, Lai Mingming has many legal means to use, but he insists on "making troubles at home, which is unimaginable". In the future, "Chaoxiaoye Daida" is the normal operation of the legislature. Of course, the DPP can continue to play the old tricks, but the results will only get worse</ p></section></article> one trillion and seven hundred and sixteen billion four hundred and twelve million eight hundred and eighty-two thousand seven hundred and eighty-five Copyrighted works of Globegroup are strictly prohibited from being reproduced or mirrored without written authorization. Violators will be investigated for legal responsibility. Editor in charge: Xiao Shan Global Times one trillion and seven hundred and sixteen billion four hundred and twenty-one million two hundred and sixty thousand three hundred and fifty-nine one one [] //img.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/files/imageDir/4d02330f0e154d8555c7437b133b452cu1.png